Supported by 202 equations and 170 illustrations, Airborne Early Warning System Concepts is an invaluable reference tool for a wide audience. It will be a welcome library addition for the engineer, scientist, system integrator, user, designer, or manager with interest in AEW concepts. It is also suitable for students and professors of electrical and system engineering or military science. This comprehensive discussion of airborne early warning (AEW) system concepts encompasses a wide range of issues, including capabilities and limitations, developmental trends and opportunities for improvement. Consisting of contributions from experts in the field, the book is presented at varying levels of complexity, ranging from elementary to advanced. For the generalist, the text provides a fundamental understanding of the status of AEW concepts with the use of only elementary mathematics. For the specialist, there are separate chapters that emphasize key AEW radar issues.
This book addresses the concept of Airborne Early Warning (AEW) systems, their capabilities and limitations, and areas in which they can be improved. It was written for systems-oriented people such as program managers, users, system integrators, and designers. Airborne platforms, sensors, and overall system requirements are discussed in broad terms. Radar is dealt with separately because of its unchallenged, all-weather capability for the detection of targets at long range. The book was written to provide an understanding of the status of AEW concepts without using complex mathematics. There are, however, sections that include details for specialists in such important areas as sidelobes due to antenna and airframe interactions, small target detection, clutter and clutter suppression, constant false alarm rate (CFAR) processing, algorithms for automatic tracking, and target classification and identification. The book's overall emphasis is on AEW system limitations, developmental trends, and opportunities for improvement.
The primary mission of Airborne Early Warning (AEW) is to detect, classify, and track
distant air targets, and to direct the simultaneous interception of multiple threat
forces. However, the AEW system also performs (often simultaneously) other tasks,
such as the coordination of search and rescue and airborne rendezvous control (e.g.,
airborne-tanker join-ups).
The concept of airborne early warning (AEW) is straightforward. AEW is a method that
force commanders can use to extend their 'eyes' to gain a more complete and extended
picture of the theater of battle. The majority of sensors employed by force commanders
to assess the overall situation are 'line-of-sight' type sensors. This means that
the sensors will see in approximately straight lines (with a slight bending due to
atmospheric refraction) out to their maximum effective range. The curvature of the
earth presents a significant limitation to ground-based, line-of-sight sensors, as
shown in Figure 2.1. Also depicted in Figure 2.1 is an AEW platform that extends the
available line-of-sight sensor coverage for the detection of threats that would otherwise
be masked by the curvature of the earth. Table 1.1 (Chapter 1) includes numerical
examples of line-of-sight radar range versus the radar and target heights. The advantages
of increased platform height for extending the maximum detection range, especially
for low-altitude targets, are evident.
In this chapter, AEW requirements and operational concepts are used to apply on AEW
platform selection. There are various factors to be considered - first factor is defense
area if it is a task force at sea. The second factor to be considered is the threat
or target to be detected. Basing requirements become a factor in platform selection.
In its simplest terms, a radar is a device for detecting and locating objects (targets)
of interest. The basic principle of operation involves the transmission of electromagnetic
waves and, some time later, the reception of the waves reflected from the target (the
echo). The term 'target' generally designates an object of interest to the radar user
in a given situation. In addition to the inescapable 'noise' present in all radio
systems, 'clutter' is used to denote the radar reflections received from area-or volume-distributed
physical entities that interfere with detection of the desired targets. Two of the
most common forms of clutter are ground clutter and sea clutter, which result from
the generally rough nature of the surface of the earth, whether land or sea.
This chapter includes discussions on the average radar cross section (RCS) of targets
and clutter, their fluctuation properties, and the detection of targets in the presence
of noise and clutter. It specifically addresses, when possible, the causes for variation
in the RCS of targets and clutter, and the statistical principles used in radar echo
analysis. Example RCS values applicable to AEW are given for targets and clutter.
Statistical target and clutter models that have proved useful for radar system analyses
are also discussed. Finally, basic background material and sample problems are included
on the detection of targets in the presence of noise and clutter.
The purpose of this paper is to address the capabilities and needs of airborne early
warning (AEW) radar. Radar-earth-target geometry, with its associated problems of
atmospheric refraction, attenuation, and multipath effects . Relative aircraft-earth-target
velocities, with the associated Doppler-processing challenges . Restrictions on frontal
area and weight that limit antennas to relatively small sizes, which thereby contribute
to poor angular resolution and increased Doppler spreading, complex aircraft/antenna
geometry, which contributes to larger antenna sidelobes and distortion of the main
lobe . Jamming and other electromagnetic interference. AEW radars use two basic modes
of operation: (1) the Doppler mode to detect moving aircraft over land and sea, and
(2) the ordinary pulse or non-Doppler mode for detecting stationary or slow-moving
targets such as boats or ships. The longrange Doppler detection mode, with its requirements
made stringent by operating from a moving platform, distinguishes the AEW radar from
others.
This chapter addresses the basic issues of tracking airborne targets (aircraft, missiles,
and so on) with a radar operating in a track-while-scan mode. Although multitarget
tracking radars are of primary interest, the issues associated with tracking a single
target will be addressed first. These issues are addressed first because most multitarget
track algorithms act as 'executives' that pass information to subordinate singletarget
track algorithms. Finally, the multiple-target tracking problem and associated algorithms
will be presented.
This chapter addresses effects of aircraft structure on antenna patterns, aperture
efficiency of low sidelobe antennas, and the determination of target altitude. Each
of these subjects is of considerable importance to the design of future airborne early
warning (AEW) radars.
IFF systems have been around for a number of years and have proved their usefulness
on all types of aircraft and ships. New systems such as Mark XV are being developed
to improve interoperability, performance, security, and increased antijam ability.
However, IFF by itself does not solve the identification problem. ESM is a valuable
adjunct to the surveillance radar for the early detection, classification, and identification
of electromagnetic emissions in order for surveillance operators to concentrate all
the available resources toward identifying potential threats. Future ESM systems are
expected to be highly integrated, totally automatic, and incorporate expert and knowledge-based
systems to handle the very high pulse data rates and complex modulation waveforms
of the future. Communications is the key element to command and control. Satellite
communications will enable the AEW platform to receive data rapidly from a variety
of sensors. Because of advances in high-speed processing, data can now be processed
aboard space-based sensor platforms and then communicated directly to the AEW platform.
Self-protection systems will be an integral part of future AEW platforms. These countermeasures
systems will be multifunctional so that they can be changed as the threat changes.
IR sensor technology will continue to mature. Staring focal plane arrays with up to
100,000 detector elements will be developed and deployed aboard future space-based
infrared sensor systems. The combined capability of radar, ESM, IFF, IR, and other
national assets should provide future AEW platforms with the capability to detect
AEW targets in adverse weather with a high degree of confidence.
The first airborne radar systems were developed during World War II, starting with
the British AI (airborne intercept) VHF (200 MHz) radar used in their Beaufighter
and Blenheim twin engine fighter/bomber. Airborne radar designs evolved quickly into
three distinct categories, airborne early warning (AEW), fighter intercept, and bombing/navigation.
Later developments included airborne radars for surface surveillance and weather avoidance.
The need for supporting systems evolved at the same time radars were developed. The
first support system needed was electronic communications. This was followed by the
need to determine whether the object detected was friendly, neutral, or the enemy,
resulting in identification, friend or foe (IFF). The need for command and control
of intercepting fighter aircraft led to the development of better navigation systems.
Then, all fighters being used for attack knew where the target was located because
they had basically the same reference grid, or had achieved 'grid lock.' Electronic
intercept systems capable of detecting and identifying electromagnetic emissions from
aircraft were added to provide an independent means of target identification and location.
Infrared and television systems have also been used to provide positive means of target
identification.
Aerodynamically shaped, tethered balloons, commonly referred to as aerostats, provide
high-endurance and cost-effective platforms for many airborne early warning applications.
This chapter describes modern aerostats and support systems, their advantages and
problems, and the radar sensors used on board.
This chapter provides a discussion of the fundamentals of target recognition technology
and concepts. Emphasis is placed on recognition techniques as applied to radar signatures,
for the AEW systems radar will in general provide the most reliable, long-range, all-weather,
all-scenario data upon which to base the recognition process.