Skip to main content
Open access
Oration
01 October 2017
International Conference & Exhibition on Electricity Distribution (CIRED)

Optimal allocation of capacitor devices on MV distribution networks using crow search algorithm

Abstract

This study aims at enhancing the performance of medium-voltage distribution systems. Improving the performance of distribution networks is employed through optimally reducing the energy loss, minimising of the loading level for the transformer substation, and economical penetration of shunt capacitors. Moreover, the impacts of changing the switching tie-line in the distribution network on the optimal allocation of the capacitor devices are discussed. A novel recent powerful swarm intelligence optimiser called crow search algorithm (CSA) is developed for optimal allocations of capacitors into electrical distribution networks. Achieving the technical and economical objective functions is subjected to various operational limits. The proposed procedure is applied on East Delta Network (EDN) as a real distribution network in the Unified Egyptian Network. Significant technical and economical merits are satisfied which prove the capability of the proposed allocation procedure.

1 Introduction

In electrical power networks, reactive power controlling is essential for improving their efficiency and performance such as reducing the power losses [1, 2], ameliorating the voltage profile of the load buses [3], minimising the loading level of the substation, and economising the penetration of the additional installed sources of reactive power [4].
For this purpose, the optimal allocation of the shunt capacitor devices in the distribution network is employed. Usually, it aims to suitably locate and size the capacitors through minimally reducing the total costs of the energy loss and the capacitor investments.
The nature of the capacitor allocation problem is non-linear, complex optimisation problem that needs an effective optimiser to deal with especially for stressed situations of network operation. It has been solved using several previous methods that differ from each other in the studied formulation and the implemented solution tool [59]. In [5], a two-stage methodology has been carried out based on the ant colony optimization (ACO) algorithm and the loss sensitivity index for minimising the energy loss and the capacitor costs. In [6], a modified discrete particle swarm optimiser has been applied for minimising the line losses and the investment costs of the capacitor devices. In [7], flower pollination algorithm (FPA) has been developed and applied for the same target, while power loss index (PLI) has been utilised in order to identify the candidate buses for installing the capacitors. In [8], the optimal allocation of the capacitor devices has been incorporated with the optimal reconfiguration problem for reducing the power losses as a single objective. This problem has been solved using a selective particle swarm optimization (SPSO). In [9], second-order PSO has been proposed for handling the optimal allocation problem of the capacitor devices by setting the number of rules utilising the fuzzy expert system.
Crow search algorithm (CSA) is a new optimiser for solving optimisation problems which is based on crow's intelligence in storing and retrieving its food in hiding locations [10]. Its outperformance over GA, PSO, and harmony search algorithm has been demonstrated for solving several engineering applications.
In this paper, this novel intelligence optimiser is developed for optimal allocations to deduce the optimal size of capacitor devices and their locations considering all buses as candidate locations to insert them and so enhancing the search space with all possible locations. The proposed procedure is applied on East Delta Network (EDN) as a real distribution network in the Unified Egyptian Network. Significant technical and economical merits are satisfied for the studied distribution network which proves the capability of the proposed allocation procedure.

2 Problem formulation

Generally, the objective of the optimal allocations of capacitors in electrical distribution networks is to minimise the energy loss and investment costs of additional capacitor devices while various operational limits are satisfied. This is mathematically stated as follows:
MinF=Min(ELi=1NLdLLossL+CCi=1NCQCi)
(1)
where F is the net costs ($/year); EL the yearly cost per kW network losses ($/kW/year); dL the duration of each load level; LossL the network losses in each load period; NL the number of load levels; CC the installation and purchase cost for each kVAr capacitor ($/kVAr); QC and NC are, respectively, the size and the number of the installed capacitor device.
This objective function is subjected to
ViminViVimax,i=1,2,,NB
(2)
SkflowSkrating,k=1,2,,NLine
(3)
0QCqQCqmax,q=1,2,,NC
(4)
NCNmax
(5)
i=1NCQCij=1NBQLoadj
(6)
where V refers to the voltage magnitude; NB is the number of buses; Sflow and Srating are the apparent power flow and the maximum rating of the distribution lines; NLine is the number of lines in the distribution network.
Nmax refers to the maximum number of possible capacitor installations; and QLoad is the reactive power demand.
The first constraint represents the voltage quality at consumer side by handling the voltage at each bus within their permissible limits, while the second gives attention to the loading of the distribution network lines. Equation (4) bounds the size of each capacitor device less than the feasible manufacturing limit while (5) aims to specify the number of capacitors to be installed in the distribution network as a budget constraint and so it represents suitability for various distribution companies. The last constraint limits the total reactive injection from new capacitor devices to be less than or equal the total load of reactive power in order to guarantee the lagging power factor and avoiding the leading one. Added to that, the equality constraints should be maintained which are usually represented by the load flow balance equations.
The decision variables of this problem are the optimal size (Loc) of capacitor devices and their locations (QC) as follows:
Controlvariables[QCqLocq],q=1,2,,NC
(7)
These candidate locations are integer numbers chosen from all load buses (2–30) and so the search space is enhanced with all possible locations, while their optimal sizes are integer numbers chosen from (0–1200) kVAr with step 150 kVAr.
The installation of new capacitor devices has great impacts on electrical distribution networks through optimally reducing the energy loss, and economical penetration of shunt capacitors as considered as objective function in (1). In addition, a significant MVA capacity of transformer substation is released [11, 12] and, it is evaluated as follows:
MVAS/STR=MVA1MVA2
(8)
where, MVAS/S-TR is the MVA capacity release of transformer substation where MVA1 and MVA2 are its MVA loading before and after installing the new capacitors, respectively (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1 CSA's stages for solving the optimal allocation problem of capacitor devices in MV distribution networks
Also, the new installations of capacitor devices will control the reactive power flow through the loaded feeders and so their MVA loading will be reduced with certain percentage which is evaluated as follows:
LoadingredK%=Sk,1flowSk,2flowSk,2flow×100,k=1,2,,NLine
(9)
where Sk,1flow and Sk,2flow are the MVA line loading pre- and post-installing the new capacitors, respectively.
Furthermore, controlling the reactive power flow through the distribution network and reducing their loading will help in improving the voltage profile at load buses with certain percentage which is evaluated as follows:
Voltageimprovei%=Vi,2Vi,1Vi,2×100,i=2,,NB
(10)
where Vi,1 and Vi,2 are the voltages at bus i for pre- and post-installing the new capacitors, respectively.

3 Proposed CSA

CSA is a new optimiser for solving optimisation problems which is based on crow's intelligence in storing and retrieving its food in hiding locations [10].
Usually, the CSA starts with a flock size of crows at random initial positions which are the values of the control variables.
As no experiences are initially existed to the crows, these positions represent their initial memories. Then, the crows update their positions searching for their best food (solution of the optimisation problems). The heart of the CSA is the update process of the position (xi, t+1) of each crow (i) by selecting another crow (j) in a random way and following it to find out its hidden foods as follows:
xi,t+1=xi,t+ri\,fli,t(memi,txi,t)ifrjAPj,tarandompositionotherwise
(11)
where ri and rj are random numbers between 0 and 1, t is the current iteration number, fli, t the flight length, and APj, t the awareness probability of crow (j) at iteration (t). mi, t+1 is the memory of crow (i) which is updated as follows:
memi,t+1=xi,t+1ifF(xi,t+1)F(xi,t)memi,totherwise
(12)
In this way, each crow updates its position and memory. This updating process is reiterated until the greatest number of iterations (tmax) is achieved.
Fig. 1 shows the main stages of the proposed CSA for solving the optimal allocation problem of capacitor devices in MV distribution networks.

4 Applications

The proposed CSA is applied on EDN as a real distribution network in the Unified Egyptian Network. Its one-line diagram is shown in Fig. 2. Its bus and line data are taken from [7]. The rated line voltage is 11 kV, the rated kW is 22,441.3, and the rated kVAr is 14,162.26. The CSA's parameters are set as follows:
flock size =50;
maximum number of iterations (tmax) = 100;
awareness probability (AP) = 0.3;
flight length (fl) = 2.
Fig. 2 One-line diagram of the studied MV distribution part of EDN
The maximum number of possible locations are set to 4; the yearly cost per kW network losses (EL) is taken 168 $/kW/year, while the installation and purchase cost for each kVAr capacitor CC is taken 5 $/kVAr [7]. The voltage magnitudes are bounded with ±5% for the underground networks as recommended in the Electricity Distribution Code by the Egyptian Electric Utility and Consumer Protection and Regulatory Authority [13].
Table 1 tabulates the optimal locations and sizes of the capacitor devices using the proposed CSA for EDN. As shown, the locations of the capacitor devices are optimally identified at buses {21, 22, 24, 26}, while their related sizes are {600, 600, 600, 750} with total installed ratings of 2550 kVAr. With these optimal allocations, the distribution losses are minimised from 805.7368 to 705.673 kW compared with the initial case with loss reduction of 12.42%. Also, Table 1 shows a comparison between the simulation results of total costs minimisation obtained using the proposed CSA and those obtained using ACO [5] which demonstrates the CSA outperformance which acquired lower total costs than that obtained using ACO.
Table 1 Simulation results using the proposed CSA for EDN
 InitialACO [5]Proposed CSA
optimal locations and sizes (kVAr)no compensationbussizebussize
9120021600
18120022600
21120024600
25120026750
installed kVAr capacitors48002550
total kW losses805.7368646.383705.673
losses reduction, %19.7812.42
losses costs, $135,363.8108,592.3118,553.1
capacitors cost, $024,00012,750
total costs, $135,363.8132,592.3131,303.1
Fig. 3 displays the CSA's convergence curve to minimise the total costs of energy loss and investment for EDN. It is clear that, the CSA has fast convergence characteristics in obtaining the optimal solution. Further improvement in the performance of electrical distribution EDN with installation of new capacitor devices using the proposed CSA as follows:
Table 2 manifests that the loading of the transformer substation is reduced from 26.4108 to 26.14623 MVA, and so a released percentage of 4.6135% is performed.
Fig. 4 shows that the MVA flow of various distribution lines is reduced and a high percentage of the loading improvement are achieved. As shown, the highest loading reduction is obtained with 15.497% at the distribution line No. 20 which is connected between buses 19 and 20, respectively.
Fig. 5 illustrates that the voltage magnitudes of all distribution nodes are increased and their improve percentage. In addition, the minimum voltage at bus 2 is improved from lower than the specification (10.406 kV) and becomes 10.461 kV while the maximum voltage at bus 2 is still within the permissible limits.
Fig. 3 Minimisation of the total costs of energy loss and investment using the proposed CSA for EDN
Fig. 4 MVA flow of distribution lines with improvement percentage of their loading using the proposed CSA for EDN
Fig. 5 Voltage magnitudes of distribution nodes and their improvement percentage using the proposed CSA for EDN
Table 2 MVA loading of transformer substation and its released capacity using the proposed CSA for EDN
MVA1MVA2MVAS/S_TR %
27.4108226.146234.613491
Moreover, the changing of the switching tie-line (the open point of the MV ring) in electrical distribution network has a significant effect on the optimal allocation of the capacitor devices. Therefore, three cases are considered by changing the switching tie-line with preserving the radiality of the distribution network and consequently, the decision variables of the optimal size (Loc) of capacitor devices and their locations (QC) are optimised as shown in Table 3. It is clear that the losses have been reduced with a percentage of 13.75, 12.75, and 12.42% by switching off lines 26–27, 28–29, and 13–30, respectively. Likewise, the minimum total costs of $127,986.7 is achieved by disconnecting lines 26–27. This concludes the high impacts of the distribution reconfiguration on the optimal allocation of the capacitor devices and their technical benefits as well.
Table 3 Simulation results using the proposed CSA for EDN
 Case 1Case 2Case 3
Disconnected tie-line13–3028–2926–27
optimal locations and sizes, kVArbussizebussizebussize
216002345025750
226002490026450
246002645028750
267502860030300
installed kVAr capacitors255024002250
total kW losses705.673702.9986694.8614
losses reduction, %12.4212.7513.75
losses costs, $118,553.1118,103.8116,736.7
capacitors cost, $12,75012,00011,250
total costs ($)131,303.1130,103.8127,986.7

5 Conclusion

In this paper, the shunt capacitors in medium-voltage (MV) distribution networks are optimally allocated by employing a novel swarm intelligence optimiser called CSA. The proposed CSA has been efficiently applied on a real distribution network in the Unified Egyptian Network in order to minimise the energy loss, minimise the costs of the capacitors, and improve the performance of distribution networks. The proposed CSA demonstrates fast convergence characteristics in solving the considered problem. Also, it states better performance than ACO. The allocation procedure using the proposed CSA accomplishes great technical and economical merits. The loading of the transformer substation is reduced and the loading of various distribution lines are improved since their flow are reduced. Also, the voltage magnitudes of all distribution nodes are improved. Furthermore, the reconfiguration of the distribution network demonstrated great impacts on the optimal allocation of the capacitor devices and their technical benefits as well. Therefore, it is recommended to incorporate the possible reconfigurations with the optimal allocation of the capacitor devices.

6 References

1.
Shaheen A.M., El Sehiemy R.A., and Farrag S.M.: ‘Integrated strategies of backtracking search optimizer for solving reactive power dispatch problem’, IEEE Syst. J., 2016, PP, (99), Doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2016.2573799
2.
El-Ela A.A., El Sehiemy R., and Shaheen A.M.: ‘Multi-objective fuzzy-based procedure for enhancing reactive power management’, IET Gen. Trans. Dist., 2013, 7, pp. 1453–1460 (10.1049/iet-gtd.2013.0051)
3.
Shaheen A.M., El Sehiemy R., and Farrag S.M.: ‘A novel adequate bilevel reactive power planning strategy’, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 2016, 78, pp. 897–909 (10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.12.004)
4.
Shaheen A.M., Spea S.R., Farrag S.M., et al: ‘A review of meta-heuristic algorithms for reactive power planning problem’, Ain Shams Eng. J., 2015, In press, Doi:10.1016/j.asej.2015.12.003
5.
El-Ela A.A., El-Sehiemy R., Kinawy A., et al: ‘Optimal capacitor placement in distribution systems for power loss reduction and voltage profile improvement’, IET Gen. Trans. Dist., 2016, 10, (5), pp. 1209–1221 (10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.0799)
6.
Ziari I., Ledwich G., Ghosh A., et al: ‘Optimal allocation and sizing of capacitors to minimize the transmission line loss and to improve the voltage profile’, Comp. Math. Appl., 2010, 60, pp. 1003–1013 (10.1016/j.camwa.2010.03.042)
7.
Abdelaziz A.Y., Ali E.S., and Abd Elazim S.M.: ‘Optimal sizing and locations of capacitors in radial distribution systems via flower pollination optimization algorithm and power loss index’, Int. J. Eng. Sci. Techn., 2016, 19, pp. 610–618 (10.1016/j.jestch.2015.09.002)
8.
Khalil T., Gorpinich A., and Elbanna G.: ‘Combination of capacitor placement and reconfiguration for loss reduction in distribution systems using selective PSO’. Proc. CIRED Conf., Stockholm, 2013
9.
Prasanna M., Balaji T., and Kannan S.M.: ‘Maximization of annual savings by using fuzzy-second order PSO based optimal capacitor placement in RDF for constant load’. IEEE Students' Conf. on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Science (SCEECS), 2012, pp. 1–4
10.
Askarzadeh A.: ‘A novel metaheuristic method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems: crow search algorithm’, Comp. Struct., 2016, 169, pp. 1–12 (10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.03.001)
11.
Shaheen A.M., El Sehiemy R., and Farrag S.M.: ‘Adequate planning of shunt power capacitors involving transformer capacity release benefit’, IEEE Syst. J., 2015, PP, (99), Doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2015.2491966
12.
Shaheen A.M., El Sehiemy R., and Farrag S.M.: ‘Multi-objective reactive power planning utilizing two-level methodology based differential evolution’. Int. Middle East Power System Conf., Paper ID 1008, 2015
13.
Electricity Distribution Code: ‘Egyptian electric utility and consumer protection and regulatory authority’. Available at http://www.jcee-eg.net/

Information & Authors

Information

Published in

History

Published online: 01 October 2017
Published in print: October 2017

Inspec keywords

  1. distribution networks
  2. power capacitors
  3. swarm intelligence
  4. optimisation

Keywords

  1. unified Egyptian network
  2. east delta network
  3. electrical distribution networks
  4. swarm intelligence optimiser
  5. capacitor devices
  6. shunt capacitors
  7. transformer substation
  8. capacitor device optimal allocation
  9. crow search algorithm
  10. medium-voltage distribution systems

Authors

Affiliations

Abdullah M. Shaheen [email protected]
South Delta Electricity Distribution Company (SDEDCo), Ministry of Electricity, El Gharbeya, Egypt
Ragab A. El-Sehiemy
Electrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr Elsheikh, Egypt

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

View options

PDF

View PDF
Access content
Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media