To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this Letter reports and validates for the first time an on-chip reseTable test method that can be used to in-situ evaluate the impact reliability of a process-related silicon microbeam. A test structure integrating impact generating device, test samples, and a lock module is proposed to evaluate the impact-resistant reliability of the process-related microbeam samples with only a common optical microscope and probe station in the fabrication line. A calculation model that uses the LS-Dyna module in the finite-element commercial software ANSYS to process the test results is proposed to obtain the numerical parameters of the impact resistance reliability of the microbeam specimen. The test structure can be manufactured using a variety of mainstream MEMS silicon processes, so it can characterise the impact reliability of silicon microbeam structures under various processes. The above three parts constitute a self-aligned, low-cost test method with automation potential, which can be used for large-scale characterisation of the impact resistance reliability of silicon microbeam structures on the fabrication line. Finally, beam specimens under three different process conditions were manufactured and successfully evaluated using this test method, which verified the rationality of this method.

References

1. 1)
  - 15. Ma, Z., Wang, Y., Shen, Q., et al: ‘Key processes of silicon-on-glass MEMS fabrication technology for gyroscope application’, Sensors., 2018, 18, (4), p. 1240 (doi: 10.3390/s18041240).
2. 2)
  - 12. Sundaram, S., Tormen, M., Timotijevic, B., et al: ‘Vibration and shock reliability of MEMS: modeling and experimental validation’, J. Micromech. Microeng., 2011, 21, (4), p. 045022(13 pages) (doi: 10.1088/0960-1317/21/4/045022).
3. 3)
  - 3. Mohamed, E., Taher, M., Saif, A., et al: ‘A novel MEMS stage for in-situ thermomechanical testing of single crystal silicon microbeams under bending’, Extreme Mech. Lett., 2018, 23, (3), pp. 1–8.
4. 4)
  - 7. Yang, C., Zhang, B., Chen, D., et al: ‘Drop-shock dynamic analysis of MEMS/package system’. Proc. Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) Conf., Wanchai, Hong Kong, 2010, pp. 520–523.
5. 5)
  - 5. Greek, S., Ericson, F., Johansson, S., et al: ‘In situ tensile strength measurement and Weibull analysis of thick film and thin film micromachined polysilicon structures’, Thin Solid Films, 1997, 292, (1-2), pp. 247–254 (doi: 10.1016/S0040-6090(96)09076-1).
6. 6)
  - 19. Petersen, K.E.: ‘Silicon as a mechanical material’, Proc. IEEE., 1982, 70, (5), pp. 900–903 (doi: 10.1109/PROC.1982.12331).
7. 7)
  - 18. Pantano, M.F., Pugno, N.M.: ‘Design of a bent beam electrothermal actuator for in situ tensile testing of ceramic nanostructures’, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2014, 34, (11), pp. 2767–2773 (doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.12.001).
8. 8)
  - 2. Florando, J.N., et al: ‘A microbeam bending method for studying stress–strain relations for metal thin films on silicon substrates’, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 2005, 53, (3), pp. 619–638 (doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2004.08.007).
9. 9)
  - 14. Torunbalci, M.M., Tatar, E., Alper, S.E., et al: ‘Comparison of two alternative silicon-on-glass microfabrication processes for MEMS inertial sensors’, Procedia Eng., 2011, 25, pp. 900–903 (doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.12.221).
10. 10)
  - 16. Beer, F.P., Johnston, E.R., DeWolf, J.T., et al: ‘Mechanics of materials’ (McGraw-Hill, USA, 2006).
11. 11)
  - 9. Wang, Z., Elfrink, R., Rovers, M., et al: ‘Shock reliability of vacuum-packaged piezoelectric vibration harvester for automotive application’, J. MEMS, 2013, 23, (3), pp. 539–548 (doi: 10.1109/JMEMS.2013.2291010).
12. 12)
  - 1. Taechung, T., Lu, L., Chang-Jin, K., et al: ‘Microscale material testing of single crystalline silicon: process effects on surface morphology and tensile strength’, Sens. Actuators A, Phys., 2000, 83, (1–3), pp. 172–178 (doi: 10.1016/S0924-4247(00)00350-2).
13. 13)
  - 11. Renaud, M.: ‘Improved mechanical reliability of MEMS piezoelectric vibration energy harvesters for automotive applications’. Proc. Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) Conf., San Francisco, USA, 2014, pp. 568–571.
14. 14)
  - 4. Yamagiwa, H., Fujii, T., Namazu, T., et al: ‘Influences of specimen size and deformation mode on the strength of single-crystal silicon micro-beam structures’. Proc. Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) Conf., Paris, France, 2012, pp. 444–447.
15. 15)
  - 13. Wang, J., Yang, Z., Yan, G.: ‘A silicon-on-glass Z-axis accelerometer with vertical sensing comb capacitors’. Proc. Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems (NEMS) Conf., Kyoto, Japan, 2012, pp. 583–586.
16. 16)
  - 10. Li, J., Broas, M., Makkonen, J., et al: ‘Shock impact reliability and failure analysis of a three-axis MEMS gyroscope’, J. MEMS, 2013, 23, (2), pp. 347–355 (doi: 10.1109/JMEMS.2013.2273802).
17. 17)
  - 17. Saravi, M., Hermann, M., Khah, H.E., et al: ‘The comparison of homotopy perturbation method with finite difference method for determination of maximum beam deflection’, J. Theor. Appl. Phys., 2013, 7, (1), p. 8 (doi: 10.1186/2251-7235-7-8).
18. 18)
  - 8. Ghisi, A., Kalicinski, S., Mariani, S., et al: ‘Polysilicon MEMS accelerometers exposed to shocks: numerical–experimental investigation’, J. Micromech. Microeng., 2009, 19, (3), p. 035023(12 pages) (doi: 10.1088/0960-1317/19/3/035023).
19. 19)
  - 6. Tsuchiya, T., Tabata, O., Sakata, J., et al: ‘Specimen size effect on tensile strength of surface-micromachined polycrystalline silicon thin films’, J. MEMS, 1998, 7, (1), pp. 106–113 (doi: 10.1109/84.661392).

On-chip test method for in-situ evaluating the impact resistance reliability of silicon microbeams

References

Related content