Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Surfactant-enhanced spectrofluorimetric detection after magnetic nanoparticles-based micro-solid-phase extraction coupled with dispersive liquid–liquid micro-extraction for determination of ciprofloxacin in human plasma

A sensitive and fast micro-solid-phase extraction (μ-SPE) coupled with dispersive liquid–liquid micro-extraction (DLLME) was reported before micelle enhanced spectrofluorimetric detection for determination of ciprofloxacin antibiotic in human plasma samples. The DLLME was performed using methanol as disperser and 1-octanol as extracting solvent. Oleic acid-modified Fe3O4 nanoparticles (as hydrophobic adsorbents) were applied in μ-SPE step to extract the analyte from DLLME procedure. The method uses the advantageous of high surface area and strong superparamagnetism of these nanoparticles to many avoid labourhood column/cartridge-passing processes of traditional SPE. The major parameters affecting signal enhancement and analyte recovery were evaluated and optimised. Under the optimal conditions, the calibration curve (with calibration equation of I f = 2.5826 C + 10.273) was linear in the range 0.5–600 μg L−1 (R 2 = 0.997) with low limit of detection of 0.21 µg L−1 and limit of quantification of 0.63 µg L−1. The intra-day and inter-day precisions (as relative standard deviation) were in the range of 1.01–1.67% and high recoveries in the range of 93.5–102.4% were obtained. The results demonstrated that the proposed method is easy, low cost, and accurate. In addition, it confirms that choosing extraction solvent was not restricted to the high-density solvents which can extent the versatility of DLLME.

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
      • 31. Rizk, M., Belal, F., Ibrahim, F., et al: ‘Derivative spectrophotometric analysis of 4-quinolone antibacterials in formulations and spiked biological fluids by their Cu(II) complexes’, J. AOAC Int., 2001, 84, (2), pp. 368375.
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
      • 3. Scherer, R., Pereira, J., Firme, J., et al: ‘Determination of ciprofloxacin in pharmaceutical formulations using HPLC method with UV detection’, Indian J. Pharm. Sci., 2014, 76, (6), pp. 541544.
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
    28. 28)
    29. 29)
    30. 30)
    31. 31)
    32. 32)
    33. 33)
    34. 34)
    35. 35)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/mnl.2018.5101
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/mnl.2018.5101
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address