This is an open access article published by the IET under the Creative Commons Attribution -NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/)
For passive bistatic radar (PBR), it is convenient to use software method to realise the signal processing. However, because of the huge amount of data computing, it is difficult to achieve the real-time signal processing by software method only with server that uses CPU for calculation. To solve the problem, the PBR signal processing method with multi-CPUs based on pipeline processing is studied. The key point of the method is to improve the parallelism of the signal processing algorithm and to use all the CPU cores efficiently for parallel computing. The whole PBR signal processing is divided into several steps, such as clutter cancellation, correlation processing, CFAR detection and so on, and each step employs different CPU resources that contain many cores. The data processed in each steps is also divided into several pieces to fully use all the CPU cores. At last, the signal processing in software for digital television terrestrial broadcasting (DTTB) signal is achieved based on the method. The experiment is carried out to verify the method. In the experiment, the whole signal processing time for DTTB signal is much less than the time of signal to be processed, and the signal processing output is continuous.
References
-
-
1)
-
8. Bernaschi, M., Di Lallo, A., Fulcoli, R., et al: ‘Combined use of graphics processing unit (GPU) and central processing unit (CPU) for passive radar signal & data elaboration’. Proc. 12th Int. Radar Symp., Leipzig, Germany, 2011, pp. 315–320.
-
2)
-
7. Li, X.B., Guan, X., Zhong, L.H., et al: ‘Real-time implementation of signal processing for passive radars based on GPU’, Syst. Eng. Electron., 2014, 36, (11), pp. 2192–2198.
-
3)
-
13. Yang, Q., Liu, Y.T.: ‘2D detection in complex background’, Syst. Eng. Electron., 2002, 24, (1), pp. 34–37.
-
4)
-
11. Chetty, K., Tan, B., Woodbridge, K.: ‘Data processing for real-time wireless passive radar’. Proc. IEEE Radar Conf., Lille, France, 2014, pp. 0455–0459.
-
5)
-
4. Colone, F., Lombardo, P.: ‘Polarimetric passive coherent location’, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 2015, 51, (2), pp. 1079–1097.
-
6)
-
6. Wang, K., Yang, J.: ‘Signal processing system of passive radar based on TS201’, J. Data Acquis. Process., 2013, 28, (4), pp. 444–449.
-
7)
-
9. Bernaschi, M., Di Lallo, A., Gallo, E., et al: ‘Use of a graphics processing unit for passive radar signal and data processing’, IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag., 2012, 27, (10), pp. 52–59.
-
8)
-
10. Cantini, C., La Rosa, E., Lo Re, A., et al: ‘Passive coherent locator signal processor on IBM cell broadband engine (CELL BE)’. Proc. IEEE Radar Conf., Pasadena, CA, USA, 2009, pp. 1–6.
-
9)
-
3. Kuschel, H., Hagan, D.O.: ‘Passive radar from history to future’. Int. Radar Symp. (IRS), Vilnius, Lithuania, 16–18 June 2010, pp. 1–4.
-
10)
-
11)
-
2. Griffiths, H.D., Baker, C.J.: ‘Passive coherent location radar systems. Part 1: performance prediction’, IEEE Proc., Radar Sonar Navig., 2005, 152, (3), pp. 153–159.
-
12)
-
5. Berger, C.R., Demissie, B., Heckenbach, J.: ‘Signal processing for passive radar using OFDM waveforms’, IEEE. J. Sel. Top. Signal. Process., 2010, 4, (1), pp. 226–238.
-
13)
-
1. Wan, X.R.: ‘An overview on development of passive radar based on the low frequency band digital broadcasting and TV signals’, J. Radars, 2012, 1, (2), pp. 109–123.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/joe.2019.0588
Related content
content/journals/10.1049/joe.2019.0588
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6