access icon openaccess Angle inversion based on anti-jamming against deceptive multiple false targets

Based on digital radio frequency memory technology, jammers can copy the radar signal multiple times by different time delay and frequency shift to form deceptive multiple false targets. For non-self-defensive-type main lobe jamming, the jamming signal and the real signal from different angles into the radar receiver, when the false target generated by the jammer was in the same range cell as the real target, the angle measurement result was with high probability in the energy centre between the target and jamming. Thus, the angle tracking performance of the monopulse radar was retrograded. In this study, an anti-jamming method called angle inversion based on power synthesis is proposed to effectively estimate the real perspective of the target from deceptive multiple false targets, and the anti-jamming performance is revealed under the condition of a different jammer-to-signal ratio.

Inspec keywords: radar signal processing; jamming; probability; radar receivers; angular measurement; digital radio

Other keywords: false target; anti-jamming method called angle inversion; angle tracking performance; anti-jamming performance; jamming signal; different jammer-to-signal ratio; digital radio frequency memory technology; frequency shift; deceptive multiple false targets; different time delay; angle measurement result; nonself-defensive-type main lobe jamming; radar signal multiple times

Subjects: Signal processing and detection; Radar equipment, systems and applications; Spatial variables measurement; Electromagnetic compatibility and interference

References

    1. 1)
      • 3. Zhao, S., Zhang, L., Zhou, Y.: ‘Measurement fusion method against false-target jamming for radar network’, J. Univ. Electron. Sci. Technol. China, 2014, 43, (2), pp. 207211.
    2. 2)
      • 4. Greco, M., Gini, F., Farina, A.: ‘Radar detection and classification of jamming signals belonging to a cone class’, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 2008, 56, (5), pp. 19841993.
    3. 3)
      • 10. Zhang, B., Bai, W., Fu, X.: ‘Performance analysis of the dual-source jamming decoying against radar seeker’, J. Air Force Eng. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.), 2015, 16, (1), pp. 4649.
    4. 4)
      • 1. Mingye, L., Zhihua, C., Baozeng, Z.: ‘The study of dense false-target jamming to LFM radar’, J. CAEIT, 2014, 9, (3), pp. 272276.
    5. 5)
      • 9. Du Jiandong, K.: ‘Tactics application of dual-source jamming in single naval ship anti-missile defense operation’, Mod. Rad., 2017, 11, pp. 97100.
    6. 6)
      • 8. Meena, D., Roy, T., Prakasam, L.: ‘Design of multilevel radar target simulator’. Radar Conf., Boston, MA, USA, 2007, pp. 203208.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Wu, Y., Wang, T., Wu, J., et al: ‘A method to suppress dense repeater jamming for airborne radar based on generalized sidelobe canceller’, J. Electron. Inf. Technol., 2014, 36, (5), pp. 10491054.
    8. 8)
      • 2. Zhao, S., Zhang, L., Zhou, Y., et al: ‘Discrimination of active false targets in multistatic radar using spatial scattering properties’, IET Radar Sonar Navig., 2015, 10, (5), pp. 817826.
    9. 9)
      • 5. Yong, Y., Dejun, F., Shunping, X.: ‘Impact analysis of CFAR detection for dense multiple false targets jamming’, Mod. Def. Technol., 2013, 41, (1), pp. 126129.
    10. 10)
      • 6. Chang, Z., Ziyue, T., Zhenbo, Z.: ‘A novel method for countering concentrated false targets jamming based on sidelobe blanking’, Radar Sci. Technol., 2013, 11, (6), pp. 599610.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Qi, X., Jin, T., Jin, M., et al: ‘Coherent dual point sources deceive semiactive monopulse radar seeker technology’. Int. Conf. on Radar, Shanghai, China, 2007, pp. 14.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/joe.2019.0488
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/joe.2019.0488
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading