Adaptive monopulse approaches for angularly localising a main-beam target in jamming are usually based on variations of the concept of optimising the sum (Σ) beam via standard adaptation and then optimising the delta (Δ) beam subject to maintain the monopulse slope. These methods have some deficiencies: they do not address target self-nulling issues; they lack tapering, leading to high sidelobes; they introduce multiple point constraints, which may result in target leakage; and they assume linearity of the monopulse ratio curve, something valid only in a small region close to the beam steering direction. The method of this study addresses these and other concerns by maintaining tapered Σ and Δ beams and fully preserving their mainlobes while adaptively suppressing jammers. This approach provides the added bonus of enabling operating in the monopulse curve's non-linear region at wider beamwidths, hence also increasing the efficiency of radar searching and tracking functions. It is shown that such approach is extremely robust and flexible, as it avoids target self-nulling effects due to beam mispointing, it is immune to target and interference dithering effects, and it can be easily extended for super-resolving multiple main-beam targets.

References

1. 1)
  - 19. Fernández, M.F., Yu, K.-B.: ‘Exploiting sub-aperture beampattern products for main-beam multi-target super-resolution in clutter and interference’. 2016 IEEE Int. Symp. Phased Array Systems and Technology, Boston, MA, USA, 2016.
2. 2)
  - 9. Fernández, M.F., Yu, K.-B.: ‘Blocking-matrix and quasimatrix techniques for extended-null insertion in antenna pattern synthesis’. 2015 IEEE Radar Conf., Arlington, VA, USA, 2015, pp. 198–203.
3. 3)
  - 4. Steele, A.K.: ‘Comparison of directional and derivative constraints for beamformers subject to multiple linear constraints’, IEE Proc. F, Commun. Radar Signal Process., 1983, 130, parts F and H, (1), pp. 41–45.
4. 4)
  - 17. Guerci, J.R.: ‘Theory and application of covariance matrix tapers for robust adaptive beamforming’, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 1999, 47, pp. 977–985.
5. 5)
  - 8. Haupt, R.: ‘Simultaneous nulling in the sum and difference patterns of a monopulse antenna’, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 1984, AP-32, (5), pp. 486–493.
6. 6)
  - 11. Yu, K.-B., Fernández, M.F.: ‘Methods for combining deterministic and adaptive nulling’. 2017 IEEE Radar Conf., Seattle, WA, USA, May 2017, pp. 123–128.
7. 7)
  - 22. Seliktar, Y., Holder, E.J., Williams, D.B.: ‘An adaptive monopulse processor for angle estimation in a mainbeam jamming and coherent interference scenario’. Proc. of 1998 IEEE Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Seattle, WA, USA, 1998.
8. 8)
  - 21. Hogan, J., Lakey, J.: ‘Duration and bandwidth limiting: prolate functions, sampling & applications’ (Springer Science & Business Media, New York, NY, USA, 2011).
9. 9)
  - 16. Mailloux, R.J.: ‘Covariance matrix augmentation to produce adaptive array pattern troughs’, Electron. Lett., 1995, 31, (10), pp. 771–772.
10. 10)
  - 12. Griffiths, L.J., Buckley, K.M.: ‘Quiescent pattern control in linearly constrained adaptive arrays’, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 1987, ASSP-35, (7), pp. 917–926.
11. 11)
  - 2. Davies, R.C., Brennan, L.E., Reed, I.S.: ‘Angle estimation with adaptive arrays in external noise fields’, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 1976, AES-12, (2), pp. 179–185.
12. 12)
  - 20. Fernández, M.F., Yu, K.-B.: ‘Main-beam multi-target super-resolution in clutter and interference using dual-sided transformations’. 2016 CIE Inter. Conf. Radar, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China, 2016.
13. 13)
  - 18. Song, H., Kuperman, W.A., Hodgkiss, W.S., et al: ‘Null broadeningwith snapshot-deficient covariance matrices in passive sonar’, IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 2003, 28, (2), pp. 250–261.
14. 14)
  - 10. Yu, K.-B., Fernández, M.F.: ‘Antenna pattern synthesis with multiple discrete and continuous nulls’. IET Int. Radar Conf., Hangzhou, People's Republic of China, October 2015.
15. 15)
  - 14. Sim, S.L., Er, M.: ‘An effective quiescent pattern control strategy for GSC structure’, IEEE Signal Process. Lett., 1996, 3, (8), pp. 236–238.
16. 16)
  - 15. Zatman, M.: ‘Comments on theory and application of covariance matrix tapers for robust adaptive beamforming’, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 2000, 48, (6), pp. 1796–2000.
17. 17)
  - 5. Vural, A.M.: ‘A comparative performance study of adaptive array processors’. Proc. of 1977 IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal, Hartford, CT, USA, 1997, pp. 695–700.
18. 18)
  - 3. Fante, R.L.: ‘Synthesis of adaptive monopulse patterns’, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 1999, 47, (5), pp. 773–774.
19. 19)
  - 1. Nikel, U.: ‘Overview of generalized monopulse estimation’, IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag., 2006, 21, (6), pp. 27–56.
20. 20)
  - 13. Tseng, C.-Y., Griffiths, L.J.: ‘A unified approach to the design of linear constraints in minimum variance adaptive beamformers’, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 1992, 40, (12), pp. 1533–1542.
21. 21)
  - 7. Qiu, S., Ma, X., Sheng, W., et al: ‘Robust adaptive monopulse algorithm based on main lobe constraints and subspace tracking’, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process., 2017, 2017, p. 14.
22. 22)
  - 6. Yu, K.-B., Murrow, D.: ‘Adaptive digital beamforming for angle estimation in jamming’, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 2001, 37, (2), pp. 508–523.

Robust adaptive beamforming with mainlobe maintenance of monopulse beams

References

Related content