access icon openaccess Impact of photovoltaic systems on voltage stability in islanded distribution networks

This work analyses the impact of photovoltaic generation on voltage stability margin in an islanded microgrid. An indicator of voltage collapse proximity, based on the maximum deliverable power, is used to study the contribution of photovoltaic generation to the voltage stability margin. In this context, the well-known power–voltage curves, also known as ‘nose’ curves, are developed, taking into account different levels of photovoltaic penetration. Furthermore, the effect of the power factor at the photovoltaic generators as well as the influence of the adopted model for such generators are also investigated. The results have shown that the photovoltaic generation can significantly affect the voltage stability margin.

Inspec keywords: power system stability; distributed power generation; power distribution faults; distribution networks; photovoltaic power systems; power system dynamic stability

Other keywords: photovoltaic generators; voltage collapse proximity; photovoltaic generation; islanded microgrid; maximum deliverable power; photovoltaic penetration; voltage stability margin; photovoltaic systems; islanded distribution networks; well-known power–voltage curves

Subjects: Distributed power generation; Distribution networks; Power system control; Solar power stations and photovoltaic power systems; Control of electric power systems

References

    1. 1)
      • 6. Van Cutsem, T., Vournas, C.: ‘Voltage stability of electric power systems’ (Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, Germany, 1998).
    2. 2)
      • 8. Katiraei, F., Iravani, M.R., Lehn, P.W.: ‘Micro-grid autonomous operation during and subsequent to islanding process’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2005, 20, (1), pp. 248257.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Assis, T.M.L., Taranto, G.N.: ‘Automatic reconnection from intentional islanding based on remote sensing of voltage and frequency signals’, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 2012, 3, (4), pp. 18771884.
    4. 4)
      • 9. IEEE Recommended Practice for Industrial and Commercial Power System Analysis, IEEE Standard 399-1997, August 1998.
    5. 5)
      • 4. WECC Renewable Energy Modeling Task Force: ‘Generic photovoltaic system models for WECC – A status report’. IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting, Denver, CO, USA, 2015.
    6. 6)
      • 5. Kundur, P., Balu, N.J., Lauby, M.G.: ‘Power system stability and control’, vol. 7, (McGraw- Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1994).
    7. 7)
      • 1. IRENA: International Renewable Energy Agency: ‘Renewable capacity statistics 2018’, March 2018, ISBN: 978-92- 9260-057-0.
    8. 8)
      • 7. Manzoni, A., Taranto, G.N., Falcão, D.M.: ‘A comparison of power flow, full and fast dynamic simulations’. Proc. of the 14th Power Systems Computation Conf., Sevilla, Spain, June 2002.
    9. 9)
      • 2. IEEE Working Group on Distributed Generation Integration: ‘Summary of distributed resources impact on power delivery’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2008, 23, (3), pp. 16361644.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/joe.2018.9369
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/joe.2018.9369
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading