This article presents the modelling and assessment of a pulsating torque mitigation control strategy by using a tidal turbine emulator in a laboratory environment. Sudden changes and variability of the tidal flow velocity have the effect of creating pulsations on tidal current turbines. These pulsations have an adverse effect on tidal turbine fatigue and ultimate loading as well as the operation of the drivetrain. For the above reasons, a pulsating torque mitigation control strategy has been developed and tested which is based on modifying the reference maximum power point speed of the generator. This article presents the assessment of this pulsating torque mitigation control strategy in a laboratory setup. A 7 kW tidal current turbine is modelled in MATLAB/Simulink. The tidal turbine is emulated in the laboratory setup by using a torque-controlled induction motor. Results show the effectiveness of the method in a laboratory environment, the ability of the generator to accelerate and decelerate based on the speed controller commands and the difference between the pulsating torque mitigation control strategy and maximum power point operation (MPPO). In addition, the experimental results are compared with a Simulink model which will show the accuracy of the modelling process.

References

1. 1)
  - 9. Sousounis, M.C., Shek, J.K.H., Mueller, M.A.: ‘Modelling, control and frequency domain analysis of a tidal current conversion system with onshore converters’, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2016, 10, (2), pp. 158–165.
2. 2)
  - 2. Sousounis, M.C., Shek, J.K.H.: ‘Mitigation of torque pulsations in variable pitch tidal current turbines using speed control’. Proc. of the 12th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conf., 2017, pp. 1146-1–1146-9.
3. 3)
  - 1. AtlantisResourcesLtd: ‘Meygen’. Available at https://www.atlantisresourcesltd.com/projects/meyge n/, accessed May 2018.
4. 4)
  - 6. Han, Y., Leithead, W.E.: ‘Combined wind turbine fatigue and ultimate load reduction by individual blade control’, J. Phys., Conf. Ser., 2014, 524, (012062), pp. 1–10.
5. 5)
  - 8. Carroll, J., McDonald, A., McMillan, D.: ‘Failure rate, repair time and unscheduled O&M cost analysis of offshore wind turbines’, Wind Energy, 2016, 19, (6), pp. 1107–1119.
6. 6)
  - 5. Whitby, B., Ugalde-Loo, C.E.: ‘Performance of pitch and stall regulated tidal stream turbines’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2014, 5, (1), pp. 64–72.
7. 7)
  - 4. Luznik, L., Flack, K.A., Lust, E.E., et al: ‘The effect of surface waves on the performance characteristics of a model tidal turbine’, Renew. Energy, 2013, 58, pp. 108–114.
8. 8)
  - 11. ‘NWTC information portal (HARP_Opt)’. Available at https://nwtc.nrel.gov/HARP_Opt, accessed March 2018.
9. 9)
  - 12. Cavagnaro, R.J., Neely, J.C., Fay, F.-X., et al: ‘Evaluation of electromechanical systems dynamically emulating a candidate hydrokinetic turbine’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2016, 7, (1), pp. 390–399.
10. 10)
  - 10. Mueller, M.A., McDonald, A.S.: ‘A lightweight low-speed permanent magnet electrical generator for direct-drive wind turbines’, Wind Energy, 2009, 12, (8), pp. 768–780.
11. 11)
  - 7. Uzunoglu, B., Amoiralis, F., Kaidis, C.: ‘Wind turbine reliability estimation for different assemblies and failure severity categories’, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2015, 9, (8), pp. 892–899.
12. 12)
  - 3. Afgan, I., McNaughton, J., Rolfo, S., et al: ‘Turbulent flow and loading on a tidal stream turbine by LES and RANS’, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 2013, 43, pp. 96–108.

Assessment of pulsating torque mitigation control strategy through tidal turbine emulation

References

Related content