The key obstacle in implementing high-voltage direct current (HVDC) grid, which is considered as the future of power grid, is the absence of effective DC circuit breaker (DCCB). At present, HVDC grid could be based on half-bridge (HB) or full-bridge (FB) voltage source converter (VSC). Among these two converter topologies, FB topology has an advantage of reverse current blocking at a much higher cost compared to HB technology and still requires a DCCB for isolating the faulty line. Therefore, HB technology is more realistic to implement HVDC grid economically if DC fault current could be controlled more effectively. In this respect, this article suggests feasible fault protection strategy based on superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) and passive resonance circuit breaker (PRCB) which could be applied effectively to HB system. To evaluate the performance of suggested protection scheme, comparative study of full-bridge modular multilevel converter (FB-MMC) protection was performed. In addition, the process to determine the optimal range for quenching resistance of SFCL was also investigated. Consequently, the authors’ suggested protection scheme has shown remarkably improved fault current limiting and interruption performance compared to FB-MMC protection scheme.

References

1. 1)
  - 13. Chen, X., Cao, C.: ‘Research on the fault characteristics of HVDC based on modular multilevel converter’. 2011 IEE Electrical Power and Energy Conf., Winnipeg, MB, October 2011, pp. 1–3.
2. 2)
  - 12. Didier, G., Leveque, J., Rezzoug, A.: ‘A novel approach to determine the optimal location of SFCL in electric power grid to improve power system stability’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2013, 28, (2), pp. 978–979.
3. 3)
  - 22. Najmi, V.: ‘Modeling, control and design considerations for modular multilevel converters’. MS thesis, Electrical Engineering Department, Viginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, May 2015.
4. 4)
  - 6. Adam, G.P., Williams, B.W.: ‘Half and full-bridge modular multilevel converter models for simulations of full-scale HVDC links and multiterminal DC grids’, IEEE J. Emerging Sel. Topics Power Electron., 2014, 2, pp. 1089–1108.
5. 5)
  - 5. He, Z., Hu, J.: ‘Mechanical DC circuit breakers and FBSM-based mmc in a high-voltage MTDC networks: coordinated operation for network riding through dc fault’. Renewable Power Generation (RPG 2015), Beijing, China, October 2015.
6. 6)
  - 14. Philip Adam, G., Ewean Davidson, I.: ‘Robust and generic control of full-bridge modular multilevel converter high-voltage DC transmission systems’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2015, 30, (6), pp. 2471–2473.
7. 7)
  - 4. Adam, G., Ahmed, K.: ‘H-Bridge modular multilevel converter (M2C) for high-voltage applications’. 21st Int. Conf. on Electricity Distribution, Frankfurt, Germany, June 2011, pp. 1–2.
8. 8)
  - 18. Jianzhong, X., Chengyoung, Z., Wenjing, L., et al: ‘Accelerated model of modular multilevel converters in PSCAD/EMTDC’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2013, 28, (1), pp. 129–136.
9. 9)
  - 17. Saad, H., Peralta, J., Dennetiere, S., et al: ‘Dynamic averaged and simplified models for MMC-based HVDC transmission systems’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2013, 28, (3), pp. 1723–1730.
10. 10)
  - 10. Bock, J., Hobl, A., Schramm, J., et al: ‘Resistive superconducting fault current limiters are becoming a mature technology’, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., 2015, 25, (3), pp. 1–2.
11. 11)
  - 1. Henry, S., Denis, A.M., Panciatici, P.: ‘Feasibility study of off-shore HVDC grids’. 2010 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, July 2010, pp. 1–5.
12. 12)
  - 15. Zhang, Y., Adam, G., Finney, S., et al: ‘Improved pulse width modulation and capacitor voltage-balancing strategy for a salable hybrid cascaded multilevel converter’, IET Power Electron., 2013, 6, pp. 783–797.
13. 13)
  - 21. Zeng, R., Yao, L.: ‘An improved modular multilevel converter with DC fault blocking capability’. IEEE PES General Meeting, National Harbor, MD, 2014, pp. 1–2.
14. 14)
  - 20. Schmitt, D., Wang, Y., Weyh, T., et al: ‘DC-side fault current management in extended multiterminal-HVDC-grids’. Proc. 9th Int. Multi-Conf., Signals Devices, 2012, pp. 1–5.
15. 15)
  - 16. Xiaoqian, L., Qiang, S., Wenhua, L., et al: ‘Protection of nonpermanent faults on DC overhead lines in MMC based HVDC systems’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2013, 28, (1), pp. 483–490.
16. 16)
  - 2. Bucher, M.K., Walter, M.M., Pfeiffer, M., et al: ‘Options for ground fault clearance in HVDC offshore networks’. 2013 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Colorado, USA, September 2012, pp. 2880–2887.
17. 17)
  - 9. Lee, J.G., Khan, U.A., Lee, H.Y., et al: ‘Impact of SFCL on the four types of HVDC circuit breakers by simulation’, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., 2016, 26, (4), pp. 1–3.
18. 18)
  - 19. Jonsson, T., Lundberg, P., Maiti, S., et al: ‘Converter technologies and functional requirements for reliable and economical HVDC grid design’. Presented at the CIGRE Canada, Calgary, AB, Canada, 2013.
19. 19)
  - 11. Zhou, C., Wang, P., Jacobson, D., et al: ‘The application of superconducting fault current limiters in Manitoba hydro HVDC system’. Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PES), Vancouver, Canada, July 2013, pp. 1–4.
20. 20)
  - 7. Frank, M.: ‘HVDC circuit breakers: a review identifying future research needs’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2011, 26, (2), pp. 998–1002.
21. 21)
  - 3. Rodriguez, J.: ‘Multilevel converters: an enabling technology for high-power applications’, Proc. IEEE, 2009, 97, (11), pp. 1791–1792.
22. 22)
  - 8. Mokhberdoran, A., Carvalho, A., Leite, H., et al: ‘A review on HVDC circuit breakers’. Renewable Power Generation Conf. (RPG 2014), Naples, Italy, September 2014.

Feasible protection strategy for HVDC system by means of SFCL and passive resonance DC breaker

References

Related content