Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon openaccess Hydraulic system fault diagnosis method based on a multi-feature fusion support vector machine

Real-time fault prevention and diagnosis in hydraulic systems is one of the challenges in engineering applications. In order to solve the problems of feature extraction and pattern recognition of different types of fault signals such as leakage, blockage, and cavitation in the hydraulic system, this paper presents a fault diagnosis method based on a multi-feature fusion support vector machine. This method first extracts the typical features of the fault signal from the time domain, frequency domain, and time−frequency domain. Then use the information entropy to calculate the weight of each feature, select the feature with the larger weight to participate in the stock index diagnosis. Finally, a multi-classifier based on the support vector machine is used to realise the fault diagnosis of the hydraulic system. The experimental results show that this method can achieve high accuracy in the hydraulic system fault diagnosis when the Gaussian radial basis function is selected. Also, compared with the commonly used improved back-projection neural network fault diagnosis method, this method has more excellent diagnostic performance.

References

    1. 1)
      • 5. Zhang, Q., Hu, N., Li, H.: ‘Fault diagnosis of the mine hoist brake based on GA-BP neural network’, J. Liaoning Tech. Univ., 2016, 35, (2), pp. 155159.
    2. 2)
      • 9. Iosifidis, A., Gabbouj, M.: ‘Multi-class support vector machine classifiers using intrinsic and penalty graphs’, Pattern Recognit., 2016, 55, pp. 231246.
    3. 3)
      • 2. Huang, D., Ke, L., Chu, X., et al: ‘Fault diagnosis for the motor drive system of urban transit based on improved hidden Markov model’, Microelectron. Reliab., 2018, 82, pp. 179189.
    4. 4)
      • 1. Vásquez, S., Kinnaert, M., Pintelon, R.: ‘Active fault diagnosis on a hydraulic pitch system based on frequency-domain identification’, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 2017, 99, pp. 116.
    5. 5)
      • 7. Sharma, R., Prasanna, S.R.M., Bhukya, R.K., et al: ‘Analysis of the intrinsic mode functions for speaker information’, Speech Commun., 2017, 91, (1), pp. 116.
    6. 6)
      • 3. Youssef, F.B., Sbita, L.: ‘Sensors fault diagnosis and fault tolerant control for grid connected PV system’, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2017, 42, (13), pp. 89628971.
    7. 7)
      • 8. Zhang, X., Mei, C., Chen, D., et al: ‘Feature selection in mixed data: a method using a novel fuzzy rough set-based information entropy’, Pattern Recognit., 2016, 56, (1), pp. 115.
    8. 8)
      • 6. Zhou, W.P., Sun, D.L., Wang, J.L.: ‘Fault diagnosis of ship power supply system based on grey correlation improved BP neural network’. IEEE Chinese Automation Congress (CAC), Wuhang, China, November 2015, pp. 12031208.
    9. 9)
      • 4. Zhao, Z., Xu, Q., Jia, M.: ‘Improved shuffled frog leaping algorithm-based BP neural network and its application in bearing early fault diagnosis’, Neural Comput. Appl., 2016, 27, (2), pp. 375385.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/joe.2018.9028
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/joe.2018.9028
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address