Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon openaccess Dynamic and static sealing performance of elastic check valve spool

The non-metallic valve spool has the advantages of safety, stability, and biocompatibility. In order to expand the application of non-metallic elastic valve spool in medical water jet, a check valve spool structure with double-protrusion structure of polyurethane is designed to replace the metal valve spool and the spring thus achieves control of the fluid. Based on the non-linear mechanical response of elastic materials, ANSYS Workbench was used to calculate the stress and deformation under the different friction coefficient and pre-compression. The results show that the static sealing effect of the valve spool is best when the pre-compression is 0.1 mm and the friction coefficient between the spool and the valve sleeve is 0.2. Then, based on bidirectional fluid–solid coupling analysis through Fluent, the flow field changes during the interaction between fluid and elastic material and the key bearing position of the valve spool are clarified. The results shows that size, processing quality, and material properties of the inner ring protrusion will determine the dynamic sealing performance of elastic valve spool.

References

    1. 1)
      • 8. Rijswick, R., Talmon, A., Rhee, C.: ‘Fluid structure interaction (FSI) in piston diaphragm pumps’, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 2016, 94, (6), pp. 11161126.
    2. 2)
      • 1. Yu, Q., Bauer, J.M., Moore, J.S., et al: ‘Fabrication and characterization of a biomimetic hydrogel check valve’. Annual Int. IEEE-EMBS Special Topic Conf. on Microtechnologies in Medicine & Biology, Lyon, France, October 2000, pp. 336339.
    3. 3)
      • 2. Petreev, A.M., Vorontsov, D.S., Primychkin, A.Y.: ‘Ring-shape elastic valve in the air percussion machines’, J. Min. Sci., 2010, 46, (4), pp. 416424.
    4. 4)
      • 3. Yang, F.Q., Kao, I.: ‘Analysis of fluid flow and deflection for pressure-balanced MEMS diaphragm valves’, Sens. Actuators, A, 2000, 79, (1), pp. 1321.
    5. 5)
      • 10. Snakenborg, D., Klank, H., Kutter, J.P.: ‘Polymer microvalve with pre-stressed membranes for tunable flow–pressure characteristics’, Microfluid. Nanofluid., 2011, 10, (2), pp. 381388.
    6. 6)
      • 9. Afrasiab, H., Movahhedy, M.R., Assempour, A.: ‘Finite element and analytical fluid-structure interaction analysis of the pneumatically actuated diaphragm microvalves’, Acta Mech.., 2011, 222, (1–2), pp. 175192.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Wei, Z., Du, J., Yuan, W., et al: ‘Fluid-Structure interaction analysis on pressure-compensating emitters’, Appl. Eng. Agric., 2014, 4, (5), pp. 783788.
    8. 8)
      • 4. Akutsu, D., Suzuki, H., Narasaka, T., et al: ‘Waterjet submucosal dissection of porcine esophagus with the HybridKnife and ERBEJET 2 system: a pilot study’, Endosc. Int. Open, 2017, 5, (1), pp. E30E34.
    9. 9)
      • 5. Tschan, C.A., Tschan, K., Krauss, J.K., et al: ‘First experimental results with a new waterjet dissector: erbejet 2’, Acta Neurochir., 2009, 151, (11), pp. 14731482.
    10. 10)
      • 6. Zhang, R., You, F., Lv, Z., et al: ‘Development and characterization a single-active-chamber piezoelectric membrane pump with multiple passive check valves’, Sensors, 2016, 16, (12), p. 2108.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/joe.2018.8979
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/joe.2018.8979
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address