access icon openaccess Risk assessment of demand response considering wind power generation

Demand response can reduce peak load, transfer part of peak load to valley load, and reduce system risk at peak time. In this study, a calculation model of power grid loss risk is proposed, which is suitable for evaluating the risk changes caused by the demand response, and calculating the corresponding risk value under the demand response load curve. In the calculation of demand response load, considering the impact of two measures of time-of-use (TOU) price and incentive measure, the TOU and incentive load curve are obtained based on the user's maximum benefit. In order to gain the corresponding load risk index, Monte Carlo simulation method is used, demand response load curve is taken as input, and load point fault time, load point fault rate and expected energy not serve indexes are introduced. Moreover, compared with the risk ratio of the original load curve, the simulation results verify the effectiveness of the proposed risk model, and prove that the demand response measures can transfer the risk of partial high load and balance the risk distribution.

Inspec keywords: wind power plants; pricing; Monte Carlo methods; demand side management; power generation economics; risk analysis; power grids

Other keywords: peak load; risk changes evaluation; Monte Carlo simulation method; risk ratio; wind power generation; load point fault rate; load risk index; power grid loss risk calculation model; incentive measure; peak time; load point fault time; demand response measures; incentive load curve; risk assessment; risk distribution; valley load; demand response load curve; risk model; TOU; time-of-use price; partial high load; risk value calculation; system risk reduction

Subjects: Monte Carlo methods; Wind power plants; Power system management, operation and economics

References

    1. 1)
      • 16. Koliou, E., Bartusch, C., Picciariello, A., et al: ‘Quantifying distribution-system operators’ economic incentives to promote residential demand response’, Util. Policy, 2015, 35, pp. 2840.
    2. 2)
      • 6. Li, W., Xu, P., Lu, X., et al: ‘Electricity demand response in China: status, feasible market schemes and pilots’, Energy, 2016, 114, pp. 981994.
    3. 3)
      • 14. Conchado, A., Linares, P., Lago, O., et al: ‘An estimation of the economic and environmental benefits of a demand-response electricity program for Spain’, Sustain. Prod. Consumption, 2016, 8, pp. 108119.
    4. 4)
      • 13. Klaassen, E.A.M., Gerwen, R.J.F.V., Frunt, J., et al: ‘A methodology to assess demand response benefits from a system perspective: A Dutch case study’, Util. Policy, 2016, 44, pp. 2537.
    5. 5)
      • 11. Lamprinos, I., Hatziargyriou, N.D., Kokos, I., et al: ‘Making demand response a reality in Europe: policy, regulations, and deployment status’, IEEE Commun. Mag., 2016, 54, (12), pp. 108113.
    6. 6)
      • 2. Yang, X., Zhou, M., Li, G.: ‘Survey on demand response mechanism and modeling in smart grid’, Power Syst. Technol., 2016, 40, (1), pp. 220226.
    7. 7)
      • 19. Dowd, K.: ‘Measuring market risk’ (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 2003).
    8. 8)
      • 1. Tian, S., Wang, B., Zhang, J.: ‘Key technologies for demand response in smart grid’, Proc. CSEE, 2014, 34, (22), pp. 35763589.
    9. 9)
      • 3. Zhao, H., Zhao, H., Hou, J.: ‘Effect of demand response on supply reliability of distribution network’, Electr. Power Autom. Equip., 2017, 37, (1), pp. 814.
    10. 10)
      • 17. Mohajeryami, S., Moghaddam, I.N., Doostan, M., et al: ‘A novel economic model for price-based demand response’, Electr. Power Syst. Res., 2016, 135, pp. 19.
    11. 11)
      • 9. Song, M., Gao, C., Su, W.: ‘Modeling and controlling of air-conditioning load for demand response applications’, Autom. Electr. Power Syst., 2016, 40, (14), pp. 158167.
    12. 12)
      • 5. Kong, X., Yang, Q., Mu, Y., et al: ‘Analysis method for customers demand response in time of using price’, Proc. CSU-EPSA, 2015, 27, (10), pp. 7580.
    13. 13)
      • 7. Medina, J., Muller, N., Roytelman, I.: ‘Demand response and distribution grid operations: opportunities and challenges’, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 2010, 1, (2), pp. 193198.
    14. 14)
      • 18. Zhao, H., Wang, Y., Chen, S.: ‘Impact of demand response on distribution system reliability’, Auto. Electr. Power Syst., 2015, 39, (17), pp. 4955.
    15. 15)
      • 20. Zheng, X., Ding, J., Shang, C., et al: ‘An assessment method of grid outage cost considering multifactorial influences’, Eng. J. Wuhan Univ., 2016, 49, (1), pp. 8387.
    16. 16)
      • 22. Zhao, H., Wang, Z., Xie, K., et al: ‘Comparative study on reliability assessment methods for medium voltage distribution network’, Power Syst. Technol., 2013, 37, (11), pp. 32953302.
    17. 17)
      • 21. Aalami, H., Yousefi, G.R., Moghadam, M.P.: ‘Demand response model considering EDRP and TOU programs’. IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conf. Exposition, Chicago, USA, 2008, pp. 16.
    18. 18)
      • 12. Guo, P., Li, V.O.K., Lam, J.C.K.: ‘Smart demand response in China: challenges and drivers’, Energy. Policy., 2017, 107, pp. 110.
    19. 19)
      • 10. Feuerriegel, S., Neumann, D.: ‘Measuring the financial impact of demand response for electricity retailers’, Energy. Policy., 2014, 65, (3), pp. 359368.
    20. 20)
      • 15. Kirschen, D., Strbac, G.: ‘Fundamentals of power system economics’, IEEE Power Energy Mag., 2004, 4, (4), pp. 7678.
    21. 21)
      • 23. Zhao, H.S., Liu, H.Y., Chen, S., et al: ‘Reliability assessment of distribution network considering preventive maintenance’. Power and Energy Society General Meeting, Boston, USA, 2016, pp. 15.
    22. 22)
      • 4. Earle, R., Kahn, E.P., Macan, E.: ‘Measuring the capacity impacts of demand response’, Electr. J., 2009, 22, (6), pp. 4758.
    23. 23)
      • 8. Fera, M., Macchiaroli, R., Iannone, R., et al: ‘Economic evaluation model for the energy demand response’, Energy, 2016, 112, pp. 457468.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/joe.2018.8899
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/joe.2018.8899
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading