access icon openaccess Generator configuration for helicopter quadruplex electric tail rotor

With the move to more electric aircraft (MEA), a key area of investigation is the development of commercially viable systems which are reliable, efficient, low mass, and are compatible and commensurate with the power and multiplex requirements of current and future aircraft. In rotorcraft, the pace of adopting more electric systems, to replace conventional mechanical and hydraulic ones, say, is perceived as being much lower than in fixed wing aircraft. However, recently there has been growing evidence to suggest that a quadruplex electric tail rotor (ETR) is a technically viable solution. This paper shows the methodology to support the most reliable configuration of the four independent generators required to power such a quadruplex tail rotor drive, and takes account of the failure severity due to power loss in each independent channel, target reliability setting, and supporting reliability analyses. The conclusions drawn support a particular hybrid series-parallel configuration of generators, with identification of further work related to the gearbox reliabilities which support the reliability attainment for the configuration.

Inspec keywords: reliability; rotors; helicopters; aircraft power systems; aerospace components; aircraft

Other keywords: reliable configuration; hydraulic ones; target reliability setting; technically viable solution; electric systems; generator configuration; current aircraft; fixed wing aircraft; efficient mass; helicopter quadruplex electric tail rotor; multiplex requirements; power loss; low mass; conventional mechanical ones; gearbox reliabilities; future aircraft; reliability attainment; supporting reliability analyses; reliable mass; independent generators; quadruplex tail rotor drive; commercially viable systems; series-parallel configuration; electric aircraft

Subjects: Mechanical components; Aerospace power systems; Reliability; Maintenance and reliability; Aerospace industry

References

    1. 1)
      • 8. Booker, J.D., Raines, M., Swift, K.G.: ‘Designing capable and reliable products’ (Butterworth- Heinemann, Oxford, 2001).
    2. 2)
      • 11. Booker, J.D.: ‘A survey-based methodology for prioritising the industrial implementation qualities of design tools’, J. Eng. Des., 2012, 23, (7), pp. 507525.
    3. 3)
      • 6. Myers, A.: ‘Complex system reliability: multichannel systems with imperfect fault coverage’ (Springer, London, 2014).
    4. 4)
      • 1. Moir, I., Seabridge, A.: ‘Aircraft systems: mechanical, electrical and avionics subsystems integration’ (Wiley, New York, 2011, 3rd Edn.).
    5. 5)
      • 2. Mellor, P.H., Yon, J., Baker, J.L., et al: ‘Electromagnetic and thermal coupling within a fault tolerant aircraft propulsion motor’. Proc. IEEE Int. Electrical Machines & Drives Conf. (IEMDC 17), Miami, US, 21–24 May 2017, Paper No. WO241 (2017).
    6. 6)
      • 9. Carter, D.S.: ‘Mechanical reliability and design’ (Macmillan, London, 1997).
    7. 7)
      • 12. Denson, W., Chandler, G., Crowell, W., et al: ‘Nonelectronic parts reliability data’ (Reliability Analysis Center Griffiss AFB, New York, 1995).
    8. 8)
      • 4. Stickels, K., Brunetti, M., Barber, M., et al: ‘Advances in helicopter electric tail rotor drive’. Proc. 43rd European Rotorcraft Forum, Milan, Italy, 12–15 September 2017, Paper No. 662.
    9. 9)
      • 3. Gazzino, M.: ‘State of the Art of more electric helicopter’. Proc. More Electric Aircraft Conf. (MEA 2012), Bordeaux, France, 20–21 November 2012, Paper No. 1–4.
    10. 10)
      • 5. Pham, H.: ‘Handbook of reliability engineering’ (Springer, London, 2003).
    11. 11)
      • 10. Goh, Y.M., McMahon, C.A., Booker, J.D.: ‘Improved utility and application of probabilistic methods for reliable mechanical design’, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. O, 2009, 223, (6), pp. 199214.
    12. 12)
      • 7. Ditlevsen, O.: ‘Structural reliability codes for probabilistic design’, Struct. Saf., 1997, 19, (3), pp. 253270.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/joe.2018.8233
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/joe.2018.8233
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading