Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon openaccess Modelling of synchronisation and energy performance of FBE- and LBE-based standalone LTE-U networks

Without the aid of licensed channel, deploying long-term evolution (LTE) networks over unlicensed spectrum (named standalone LTE-U networks) faces the difficulty of establishing and maintaining synchronisation between user equipments and base stations. In this work, considering the two modes of listen-before-talk-based channel access scheme, frame-based equipment (FBE) and load-based equipment (LBE), the authors propose analytical frameworks to study the successful probability of synchronisation and the energy consumption of synchronisation in a standalone LTE-U network. Specifically, for the LBE mode, the authors also propose a Lattice-Poisson algorithm-based approach to derive the distribution of the channel non-occupancy period of a standalone LTE-U network. Furthermore, the authors explore the impact of diverse protocol parameters of both FBE and LBE modes on the two studied performance metrics. Simulation results demonstrate the accuracy of the analysis, and shed some light on the selection of FBE and LBE for standalone LTE-U networks, in terms of synchronisation, energy consumption, and throughput of standalone LTE-U and Wi-Fi networks.

References

    1. 1)
      • 6. Zhang, R., Wang, M., Cai, L.X.: ‘Modeling and analysis of MAC protocol for LTE-U co-existing with Wi-Fi’. Proc. GLOBECOM, San Diego, CA, December 2015.
    2. 2)
      • 9. Kanyeshuli, A.: ‘LTE-in unlicensed band: medium access and performance evaluation’. Master thesis, University of Agder, 2015.
    3. 3)
      • 2. Ratasuk, R., Uusitalo, M.A., Mangalvedhe, N., et al: ‘License-exempt LTE deployment in heterogeneous network’. Proc. ISWCS, Paris, FR, August 2012, pp. 246250.
    4. 4)
      • 15. Tirronen, T., Larmo, A., Sachs, J.: ‘Reducing energy consumption of LTE devices for machine-to-machine communication’. Proc. GC Workshops, California, USA, December 2012, pp. 16501656.
    5. 5)
      • 11. Ong, E.H., Kneckt, J., Alanen, O., et al: ‘IEEE 802.11ac: enhancements for very high throughput WLANs’. Proc. PIMRC, Toronto, Canada, September 2011, pp. 849853.
    6. 6)
      • 4. Broadband radio access networks (BRAN); 5 GHz high performance RLAN; harmonized EN covering the essential requirements of article 3.2 of the R&TTE directive’. Tech. Rep. EN 301 893 v1.7.1, Eur. Telecommun. Standards Inst., Sophia Antipolis, France, June 2012.
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
      • 8. Ericsson: ‘Discussion on LBT protocols’. Tech. Rep. R1-151996, 3GPP, April 2015.
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
      • 14. Abate, J., Choudhury, G.L., Whitt, W.: ‘An introduction to numerical transform inversion and its application to probability models’, in Grassmann, , W.K. (Ed.): ‘Computational probability’ (Kluwer, Norwell, MA, USA, 2000), pp. 257323.
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
      • 16. Ho, T.S., Chen, K.C.: ‘Performance evaluation and enhancement of the CSMA/CA MAC protocol for 802.11 wireless LANs’. Proc. PIMRC, Taipei, Taiwan, October 1996, pp. 392396.
    16. 16)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/joe.2017.0039
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/joe.2017.0039
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address