Steady-state visual evoked response (SSVEP) is widely used in visual-based diagnosis and applications such as brain–computer interfacing due to its high information transfer rate and the capability to activate commands through simple gaze control. However, one major impediment in using flashing visual stimulus to obtain SSVEP is eye fatigue that prevents continued long-term use preventing practical deployment. This combined with the difficulty in establishing precise pulse-width modulation (PWM) that results in poorer accuracy warrants the development of appropriate approach to solve these issues. Various studies have suggested the usage of high frequencies of visual stimulus to reduce the visual fatigue for the user but this results in poor response performance. Here, the authors study the use of extremely high duty-cycles in the stimulus in the hope of solving these constraints. Electroencephalogram data was recorded with PWM duty-cycles of 50–95% generated by a precise custom-made light-emitting diode hardware and tested ten subjects responded that increasing duty-cycles had less visual strain for all the frequency values and the SSVEP exhibited a subject-independent peak response for duty-cycle of 85%. This could pave the way for increased usage of SSVEP for practical applications.

References

1. 1)
  - 23. Mouli, S., Palaniappan, R., Sillitoe, I.P.: ‘A configurable, inexpensive, portable, multi-channel, multi-frequency, multi-chromatic RGB LED system for SSVEP stimulation’, in Hassanien, A.E., Azar, T.A. (EDs.): ‘Brain–computer interfaces’ (Springer International Publishing, 2015), pp. 241–269.
2. 2)
  - 6. Gruss, L.F., Wieser, M.J., Schweinberger, S.R., et al: ‘Face-evoked steady-state visual potentials: effects of presentation rate and face inversion’, Front. Hum. Neurosci., 2012, 6, (316), pp. 1–10, doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00316.
3. 3)
  - 24. Mouli, S., Palaniappan, R.: ‘Radial photic simulation for maximal EEG response for BCI applications’. Ninth Int. Conf. on Human System Interaction (HSI) (IEEE), Portsmouth, UK, July 2016, pp. 32–46, doi: 10.1109/HSI.2016.7529658.
4. 4)
  - 2. Mohammad, A.-A., Angelika, P.: ‘Advancing the detection of steady-state visual evoked potentials in brain–computer interfaces’, J. Neural Eng., 2016, 13, (3), p. 36005 (doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/3/036005).
5. 5)
  - 11. Luauté, J., Laffont, I.: ‘BCIs and physical medicine and rehabilitation: the future is now’, Ann. Phys. Rehabil. Med., 2015, 58, (1), pp. 1–2 (doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2014.12.002).
6. 6)
  - 14. Yin, E., Zhou, Z., Jiang, J., et al: ‘A novel hybrid BCI speller based on the incorporation of SSVEP into the P300 paradigm’, J. Neural Eng., 2013, 10, (2), p. 026012 (doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/10/2/026012).
7. 7)
  - 22. Wu, Z., Lai, Y., Xia, Y., et al: ‘Stimulator selection in SSVEP-based BCI’, Spec. Issue Bioeng. Taiwan, 2008, 30, (8), pp. 1079–1088, doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.01.004.
8. 8)
  - 13. Yuan, P., Chen, X., Wang, Y., et al: ‘Enhancing performances of SSVEP-based brain–computer interfaces via exploiting inter-subject information’, J. Neural Eng., 2015, 12, (4), p. 46006 (doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/12/4/046006).
9. 9)
  - 21. Kus, R., Duszyk, A., Milanowski, P., et al: ‘On the quantification of SSVEP frequency responses in human EEG in realistic BCI conditions’, PLoS One, 2013, 8, (10), p. 77536 (doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077536).
10. 10)
  - 16. Zhou, S., Allison, B.Z., Kübler, A., et al: ‘Effects of background music on objective and subjective performance measures in an auditory BCI’, Front. Comput. Neurosci., 2016, 10, (105), pp. 1–9, doi: 10.3389/fncom.2016.00105.
11. 11)
  - 12. Spuler, M.: ‘A brain–computer interface (BCI) system to use arbitrary Windows applications by directly controlling mouse and keyboard’. 37th Annual Int. Conf. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), August 2015, pp. 1087–1090, doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318554.
12. 12)
  - 18. Volosyak, I., Cecotti, H., Gräser, A.: ‘Impact of frequency selection on LCD screens for SSVEP based brain–computer interfaces’. Bio-Inspired Systems: Computational and Ambient Intelligence Springer, 2009, pp. 706–713, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-02478-8_88.
13. 13)
  - 8. Robertson, S.S., Watamura, S.E., Wilbourn, M.P.: ‘Attentional dynamics of infant visual foraging’, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2012, 109, (28), pp. 11460–11464 (doi: 10.1073/pnas.1203482109).
14. 14)
  - 1. Wang, Y., Wang, R., Gao, X., et al: ‘A practical VEP-based brain–computer interface’, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil., 2006, 14, (2), pp. 234–240 (doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2006.875576).
15. 15)
  - 19. Nakanishi, M., Wang, Y., Wang, Y.-T., et al: ‘Generating visual flickers for eliciting robust steady-state visual evoked potentials at flexible frequencies using monitor refresh rate’, PLoS One, 2014, 9, (6), p. 99235 (doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099235).
16. 16)
  - 17. Cecotti, H., Volosyak, I., Graser, A.: ‘Reliable visual stimuli on LCD screens for SSVEP based BCI’. 18th European IEEE Signal Processing Conf., August 2010, pp. 919–923.
17. 17)
  - 28. Huang, G., Yao, L., Zhang, D., et al: ‘Effect of duty cycle in different frequency domains on SSVEP based BCI: a preliminary study’. Annual Int. Conf. of Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), San Diego, September 2012, pp. 5923–5926.
18. 18)
  - 10. John, J.W., Palaniappan, R.: ‘Analogue mouse pointer control via an online steady state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) brain–computer interface’, J. Neural Eng., 2011, 8, (2), p. 25026 (doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/8/2/025026).
19. 19)
  - 15. Jin, J., Sellers, E.W., Zhou, S., et al: ‘A P300 brain–computer interface based on a modification of the mismatch negativity paradigm’, Int. J. Neural Syst., 2015, 25, (3), p. 1550011 (doi: 10.1142/S0129065715500112).
20. 20)
  - 25. Delorme, A., Makeig, S.: ‘EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis’, J. Neurosci. Methods, 2004, 134, (1), pp. 9–21 (doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009).
21. 21)
  - 9. Farzin, F., Hou, C., Norcia, A.M.: ‘Piecing it together: infants’ neural responses to face and object structure’, J. Vis., 2012, 12, (13), pp. 6–10 (doi: 10.1167/12.13.6).
22. 22)
  - 7. Zhu, M., Alonso-Prieto, E., Handy, T., et al: ‘The brain frequency tuning function for facial emotion discrimination: an SSVEP study’, J. Vis., 2016, 16, (6), pp. 12–16 (doi: 10.1167/16.6.12).
23. 23)
  - 25. Liu, Y., Jiang, X., Cao, T., et al: ‘Implementation of SSVEP based BCI with Emotiv EPOC’. IEEE Int. Conf. on Virtual Environments Human–Computer Interfaces and Measurement Systems (VECIMS), Tianjin, China, July 2012, pp. 34–37, doi: 10.1109/VECIMS.2012.6273184.
24. 24)
  - 20. Mouli, S., Palaniappan, R., Sillitoe, I.P., et al: ‘Performance analysis of multi-frequency SSVEP-BCI using clear and frosted colour LED stimuli’. 13th Int. IEEE Conf. in Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE), Chania, Greece, November 2013, pp. 1–4, doi: 10.1109/BIBE.2013.6701552.
25. 25)
  - 4. Hsu, H.T., Lee, I.H., Tsai, H.T., et al: ‘Evaluate the feasibility of using frontal SSVEP to implement an SSVEP-based BCI in young, elderly and ALS groups’, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 2016, 24, (5), pp. 603–615 (doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2015.2496184).
26. 26)
  - 26. Cotrina, A., Benevides, A., Ferreiram, A., et al: ‘Towards an architecture of a hybrid BCI based on SSVEP-BCI and passive-BCI’. 36th Annual Int. Conf. of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Orlando, August 2014, pp. 1342–1345, doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6943847.
27. 27)
  - 3. Wang, M., Daly, I., Allison, B.Z., et al: ‘A new hybrid BCI paradigm based on P300 and SSVEP’, J. Neurosci. Methods., 2015, 244, pp. 16–25 (doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.06.003).
28. 28)
  - 5. Norcia, A.M., Appelbaum, L.G., Ales, J.M., et al: ‘The steady-state visual evoked potential in vision research: a review’, J. Vis., 2015, 15, (6), pp. 1–46 (doi: 10.1167/15.6.4).
29. 29)
  - 29. Phothisonothai, M., Watanabe, K.: ‘Time-frequency analysis of duty cycle changing on steady-state visual evoked potential: EEG recording’. Annual Summit and Conf. of Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association, China, December 2014, pp. 1–4, doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6347342.

Toward a reliable PWM-based light-emitting diode visual stimulus for improved SSVEP response with minimal visual fatigue

References

Related content