access icon openaccess Implementation of high-speed–low-power adaptive finite impulse response filter with novel architecture

An energy efficient high-speed adaptive finite impulse response filter with novel architecture is developed. Synthesis results along with novel architecture on different complementary metal–oxide semiconductor (CMOS) families are presented. Analysis is performed using Artix-7, Spartan-6 and Virtex-4 for most popular adaptive least mean square filter for different orders such as N = 8, 16, 32. The presented work is done using MATLAB (2013b) and Xilinx (14.2). From the synthesis results, it can be found that CMOS (28 nm) achieves the lowest power and critical path delay compared to others, and thus proves its efficiency in terms of energy. Different parameters are considered such as look up tables and input–output blocks, along with their optimised results.

Inspec keywords: integrated circuit design; adaptive filters; CMOS digital integrated circuits; low-power electronics; FIR filters

Other keywords: energy efficient high-speed adaptive finite impulse response filter; adaptive least mean square filter; high-speed-low-power adaptive finite impulse response filter; Matlab; Vertex-4; size 28 nm; critical path delay; Artix-7; complementary metal-oxide semiconductor; Xilinx; CMOS family; Spartan-6

Subjects: Digital circuit design, modelling and testing; CMOS integrated circuits; Digital filters; Digital filters

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
      • 1. Widrow, B., Stearns, S.D.: ‘Adaptive signal processing’ (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1985).
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
      • 14. Spartan-6 user-guide. Available at http://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/user_guide/ug380.pdf.
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
      • 16. Artix-7 Low Power FPGA user guide. Available at http://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/user_guide/.
    12. 12)
      • 7. Meher, P.K., Park, S.Y.: ‘Low adaptation-delay adaptive filter part-II: an optimized architecture’. Proc. IEEE Int. Midwest Symp. Circuits and Systems, August 2011.
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
      • 13. Vanus, J., Styskala, V.: ‘Application of optimal settings of the LMS adaptive filter for speech signal processing’. Proc. IEEE Int. Multiconf. Computer Science and Information Technology, October 2010, pp. 767774.
    15. 15)
      • 2. Haykin, S., Widrow, B.: ‘Least-mean-square adaptive filters’ (Wiley-Inter Science, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2003).
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
      • 4. Paarhi Keshav, K.: ‘VLSI digital signal processing systems design and implementations’ (John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 2003).
    18. 18)
      • 12. Meher, P.K., Maheshwari, M.: ‘A high-speed FIR adaptive filter architecture using a modified delayed LMS algorithm’. Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Circuits Systems, May 2011, pp. 121124.
    19. 19)
      • 6. Meyer, M.D., Agrawal, D.P.: ‘A modular pipelined implementation of a delayed LMS transversal adaptive filters’. Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Circuits and Systems, May 1990, pp. 19431946.
    20. 20)
      • 3. Yi, Y., Woods, R., Ting, R.L.-K., Cowan, C.F.N.: ‘High speed FPGA-based implementations of delayed-LMS filters’, J. Very Large Scale Integr. (VLSI) Signal Process., 2005, 39, (1–2), pp. 113131.
    21. 21)
      • 15. Vitex-4 user guide. Available at http://www.xilinx.xom/support/documentation/user_guide/ug070.pdf.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/joe.2014.0198
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/joe.2014.0198
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading