http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Effects of probe and inducer on saturation of crack signal in high-sensitivity AC field measurement technique

Effects of probe and inducer on saturation of crack signal in high-sensitivity AC field measurement technique

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
$19.95
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IEE Proceedings - Science, Measurement and Technology — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

As in the eddy-current technique, a major problem in separating and sizing deep surface cracks in the AC field measurement (ACFM) technique is the saturation of the crack signal. It is essential that the operator ensures the crack signal does not reach saturation for the deepest possible crack. The paper explains how the parameters of the probe and inducer in the high-sensitivity ACFM technique with a rhombic inducer control the sensitivity and saturation level. Theoretical results are presented on the effects of the inducer size, probe position and probe length on the crack signal. It is shown that for an inspection task where there is an indication of the maximum crack depth, the saturation problem can be avoided by choosing the right size inducer, the right position for the probe and the correct probe length.

References

    1. 1)
      • D. Mirshekar-Syahikal , C. Moschovinos , P. Hadjikyriakos . A new combination of probe and inducer with enhanced sensivity for AC field measurements of surface cracks. Rev. Prog. Quant. Nondestr. Eval. , 1095 - 1102
    2. 2)
      • D. Mirshekar-Syahkal , R.F. Mostafavi . High-sensitvity AC field measurement using rhombic inducer. Rev. Prog. Quant. Nondestr. Eval. , 1121 - 1128
    3. 3)
      • J.H. Rose , E. Uzal , J.C. Moulder . Magnetic permeability and eddy-current measurements. Rev. Prog. Quant. Nondestr. Eval. , 315 - 322
    4. 4)
      • V.S. Cecco , G. van Drunen , R. S. Sharp . (1985) Recognising the scope of eddy current testing, Research techniques in nondestructive testing.
    5. 5)
      • D. Mirshekar-Syahkal , R.F. Mostafavi . Analysis technique for interaction of high-frequency rhombic inducer field with cracks in metals. IEEE Trans. Magn. , 2291 - 2298
    6. 6)
      • D.H. Michael , A.M. Lewis , M. McIvor , R. Collins . Thin-skin electromagnetic fields in the neighbourhood of surface breaking cracks in metals. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, Maths Phys. Sci. , 587 - 603
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/ip-smt_20010517
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/ip-smt_20010517
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address