Robust methodology for the discrimination of brain tumours from in vivo magnetic resonance spectra

Robust methodology for the discrimination of brain tumours from in vivo magnetic resonance spectra

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IEE Proceedings - Science, Measurement and Technology — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy provides a direct non-invasive measure of tissue biochemistry, but tissue heterogeneity causes considerable mixing between tissue categories. A systematic methodology for variable selection and performance estimation, applied to 98 in vivo spectra from cysts and five categories of brain tumour is proposed. The selection of predictive variables from the spectra, and the estimation of misclassification errors, are made robust by pre-filtering the irrelevant spectral components and repeatedly applying bootstrap resampling. Three alternative approaches to the methodology were investigated, with reference to pairwise discriminant models. The first approach is applied directly to the spectral intensity values, treated as independent covariates that are interpreted as metabolite indicators, proceeding to search for the smallest number of metabolites necessary for class discrimination. The two other approaches use independent component analysis (ICA) to separate the heterogeneous spectra into a small number of independent spectral sources of intrinsic tissue types. Given the six classes with strong inter-class mixing, the most accurate classifier based on linear discriminant models is obtained by first optimising the discrimination between class pairs, then combining their outcome using a pairwise coupling method. Finally, the statistical and ICA pre-processing methods are compared in a retrospective study for the first class assignment pair, to separate low- and medium-grade from high-grade astrocytic tumours.


    1. 1)
      • M.O. Leach . Introduction to in vivo MRS of cancer: new perspectives and open problems. Anticancer Res.
    2. 2)
      • H. Bruhn , J. Frahm , M.L. Gyngell , K.D. Merboldt , W. Hanicke , R. Sauter , C. Hamburger . Non-invasive differentiation of tumours with use of localised H-1 MRspectroscopyin vivo: initial experience in patients with cerebral tumours. Radiology , 541 - 548
    3. 3)
      • M.C. Preul , Z. Caramanos , D.L. Collins , J.-G. Villemure , R. Leblanc , A. Olivier , P. Ronald , D.L. Arnold . Accurate, non-invasive diagnosis of human brain tumours by usingproton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Nature Med. , 323 - 325
    4. 4)
      • P.J.G. Lisboa , S.P.J. Kirby , A. Vellido , Y.Y.B. Lee , W. El-Deredy . Assessment of statistical and neural network methods in NMR spectralclassification and metabolite selection. NMR Biomed. , 225 - 234
    5. 5)
      • A.R. Tate , J.R. Griffiths , I. Martínez-Pérez , A. Moreno , I. Barba , M.E. Cabañas , D. Watson , J. Alonso , F. Bartumeus , F. Isamat , E. Ferrer , A. Capdevila , C. Arús . Towards a method for automated classification of 1H MRS spectrafrom brain tumours. NMR Biomed. , 171 - 191
    6. 6)
      • S.L. Howells , R.J. Maxwell , A.C. Peet , J.R. Griffiths . An investigation of tumour 1Hnuclear magnetic resonance spectra by the application of chemometric techniques. Magn. Resonance Med. , 214 - 236
    7. 7)
      • B. Efron , R.J. Tibshirani . (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap.
    8. 8)
      • J.-F. Cardoso . Higher-order contrasts for independent component analysis. Neural Comput. , 157 - 192
    9. 9)
      • S.J. Roberts . Independent component analysis: source assessment and separation,a Bayesian approach. IEE Proc., Vis. Image Signal Process. , 149 - 154
    10. 10)
      • C.R. Rao . (1952) Advanced statistical methods in biometric research.
    11. 11)
      • T. Hastie , R.J. Tibshirani . Classification by pairwise coupling. Ann. Statistics , 451 - 471

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address