Your browser does not support JavaScript!

High-resolution array processing methods for joint direction-velocity estimation

High-resolution array processing methods for joint direction-velocity estimation

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IEE Proceedings F (Radar and Signal Processing) — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

For the passive estimation of directions of arrivals (DOAs) of transmitting sources from an antenna array, high resolution estimators can be achieved from maximum likelihood or signal subspace based concepts, provided that certain model assumptions are satisfied. For the signal subspace class of methods, the sources are nearly always regarded as being stationary during the observation interval of the array data. If this is the case, and if all the other model assumptions are valid, then the DOA can be estimated to arbitrary accuracy in the presence of noise by observing the data over a sufficiently long time interval. When sources are in fact moving relative to the receiving array, errors are induced in signal subspace methods. These depend on the extent of the source motion. Hence there is a trade-off between decreasing noise errors and increasing motion errors as the observation time is increased, and some optimum observation period exists. In some cases, however, even the performance at the optimum observation interval may be unsatisfactory, and alternative approaches are desirable. Signal subspace concepts break down when sources are moving, and maximum likelihood methods for moving sources are computationally expensive. To overcome these problems three novel algorithms have been developed for the joint estimation of source position and velocity from a batch of array data for sources moving with constant angular velocity. These allow increased accuracy in the source position determination, and provide unbiased velocity estimates. The performance of the estimators is compared to the Cramer-Rao lower bound.


    1. 1)
      • C.R. Sastry , E.W. Kamen , M. Simaan . An efficient algorithm for tracking the angles of arrival of moving targets. IEEE Trans. , 242 - 246
    2. 2)
      • I.M.G. Lourtie , J.M.F. Moura . Multisource delay estimation: nonstationary signals. IEEE Trans. , 1033 - 1048
    3. 3)
      • Whinnett, N.W.: `Superresolution array processing in the presence of moving sources', 1992, PhD Dissertation, Imperial College, University of London.
    4. 4)
      • Whinnett, N.W., Manikas, A.: `Errors in signal subspace methods in the presence of moving sources', Proc. ICASSP, 1991, Toronto, p. 3293–3296.
    5. 5)
      • A. Paulraj , T. Kailath . Eigenstructure methods for direction of arrival estimation in the presence of unknown noise fields. IEEE Trans. , 13 - 20
    6. 6)
      • Lecadre, J.P., Zugmeyer, O.: `Temporal integration for array processing', Proc. ICASSP, 1991, Toronto, p. 1441–1444.
    7. 7)
      • J. Yang , M. Kaveh . Adaptive eigen subspace algorithms for direction or frequency estimation and tracking. IEEE Trans. , 241 - 251
    8. 8)
      • K. Yu . Recursive updating the eigenvalue decomposition of a covariance matrix. IEEE Trans. , 1136 - 1145
    9. 9)
      • F. Haber , M. Zoltowski . Spatial spectrum estimation in a coherent signal environment using an array in motion. IEEE Trans. , 301 - 310
    10. 10)
      • E. Weinstein . Optimal source localisation and tracking from passive array measurements. IEEE Trans. , 69 - 76
    11. 11)
      • R.O. Schmidt . Multiple emitter location and signal parameter estimation. IEEE Trans. , 276 - 280
    12. 12)
      • Li, G., Yu, K.: `Adaptive rank-2 update algorithm for eigenvalue decomposition', Proc. ICASSP, 1988, New York, p. 1510–1513.
    13. 13)
      • M. Viberg , B. Ottersten . Sensor array processing based on subspace fitting. IEEE Trans. , 1110 - 1121
    14. 14)
      • C.H. Knapp , G.C. Carter . Estimation of time delay in the presence of source or receiver motion. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. , 1545 - 1549
    15. 15)
      • B. Champagne , M. Eizenman , S. Pasupathy . Factorization properties of optimum space-time processors in nonstationary environments. IEEE Trans. , 1853 - 1869
    16. 16)
      • A. Paulraj , V.U. Reddy , T. Kailath . Analysis of signal cancellation due to multipath in optimum beamformers for moving arrays. IEEE Trans. , 163 - 171
    17. 17)
      • J.A. Stuller . Maximum likelihood estimation of time-varying delay — part 1. IEEE Trans. , 300 - 313
    18. 18)
      • Thompson, P.A.: `An adaptive spectral analysis technique for unbiased frequency estimation in the presence of white noise', Proc. 13th Asimolar Conf. Circuits, Systems & Computers, 1980, p. 529.
    19. 19)
      • Friedlander, B., Weiss, A.J.: `Eigenstructure methods for direction finding with sensor gain and phase uncertainties', Proc. ICASSP, 1988, New York, p. 2681–2684.
    20. 20)
      • C.K. Sword , M. Samaan , E.W. Kamen . Multiple target angle tracking using sensorarray outputs. IEEE Trans. , 367 - 373
    21. 21)
      • P. Stoica , A. Nehorai . MUSIC, maximum likelihood, and Cramer-Rao bound. IEEE Trans. , 720 - 741
    22. 22)
      • Orfanidis, S.J.: `Adaptive structured eigenvector methods', Proc. ICASSP, 1990, Albuquerque, p. 2683–2686.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address