Comparison of the seismic and ground probing radar methods in geological surveying

Comparison of the seismic and ground probing radar methods in geological surveying

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IEE Proceedings F (Communications, Radar and Signal Processing) — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

The use of ground probing radar has increased significantly over the past few years in the civil engineering field. As a geophysical technique it has much in common with the seismic reflection method. The information derived from both methods is displayed as a time/distance cross-section, which is very similar in appearance to a geological cross-section. However, the time section can only be converted to a depth section when the velocity of propagation of the seismic or electromagnetic pulse within each of the resolved layers is known. The use of these two methods in shallow geological surveys at the site investigation stage of a civil engineering construction is reviewed and illustrated by case histories. It is shown that the development of high-frequency sources has improved the resolution obtainable from the seismic reflection method while the gradual improvement in instrumentation has resulted in greater penetration being achieved with the radar method. A consideration of the penetration shows that with both methods it is largely controlled by the moisture content of the superficial deposits, which has a very strong influence on the attenuation of both seismic and electromagnetic energy. The effect is, in fact, complementary since a dry material will transmit electromagnetic energy better than a saturated one, while the converse is true for seismic energy.


    1. 1)
      • D.M. McCann , E.M. Andrew , C. McCann . Seismic sources for shallow reflection surveying. Geophys. Prospect. , 943 - 955
    2. 2)
      • H. Pascal . Further discussion on attenuation and dispersion of electromagnetic wave propagation in fluid-saturated porous rocks and applications to dielectric constant well-logging. Geophys. , 1373 - 1380
    3. 3)
      • E.I. Parkhomenko . (1967) , Electrical properties of rocks.
    4. 4)
      • L.T. Dolphin , R.L. Bollen , G.N. Oetzel . An underground electromagnetic sounder experiment. Geophys. , 49 - 55
    5. 5)
      • J.C. Cook . Radar transparencies of mine and tunnel rocks. Geophys. , 865 - 885
    6. 6)
      • M.R.J. Wyllie , A.R. Gregory , L.W. Gardner . Elastic wave velocities in heterogeneous and porous media. Geophys. , 41 - 70
    7. 7)
      • J.B. Hersey , M.N. Hill . (1983) Continuous reflection profiling, The Sea.
    8. 8)
      • G.E.G. Sargent . A review of acoustic equipment for studying submarine sediments. Trans. Inst. Mining & Metallurgy , 113 - 118
    9. 9)
      • J.B. Doornebal , K. Helbig . High resolution reflection seismics on a tidal flat in the Dutch delta—acquisition, processing, and interpretation. First Break , 9 - 20
    10. 10)
      • Ulricksen, C.P.F.: `Application of impulse radar to civil engineering', 1982, Ph.D. Thesis., Lund University of Technology, Lund, Sweden.
    11. 11)
      • A.P. Annan , J.L. Davis . Impulse radar sounding in permafrost. Radio Sci. , 383 - 394
    12. 12)
      • R.R. Unterberger . Radar propagation in rock salt. Geophys. Prospect. , 312 - 328
    13. 13)
      • Olsson, O., Sandberg, E., Nilsson, B.: `Crosshole investigations—the use of borehole radar for the detection of fracture zones in crystalline rock', 83-06, Stripa Project Internal Report, 1983.
    14. 14)
      • B.W. Darracott , M.I. Lake . An initial appraisal of ground probing radar for site investigation in Britain. Ground Eng. , 14 - 18
    15. 15)
      • P.J. Leggo . Geological application of ground impulse radar. Trans. Inst. Mining & Metallurgy , B1 - B5
    16. 16)
      • P.J. Leggo , C. Leech . (1983) Subsurface investigation for shallow mine workings and cavities by the ground impulse radar technique.
    17. 17)
      • T. Imai , T. Sakayama , T. Kanemori . Use of ground probing radar and resistivity surveys for archaeological investigations. Geophys. , 137 - 150
    18. 18)
      • Olsson, O., Sandberg, E.: `Cross-hole investigations — Preliminary design of a new borehole radar system', 84-04, Stripa Project Internal Report, 1984.
    19. 19)
      • R.J. Lytle , E.F. Laine , D.L. Lager , D.T. Davis . Cross-borehole electromagnetic probing to locate high-contrast anomalies. Geophys. , 1667 - 1676
    20. 20)
      • A new way to locate pipes and profile river bottoms. Pipeline Industry
    21. 21)
      • Davis, J.L., Annan, A.P., Vaughan, C.: `Placer exploration using radar and seismic methods', Extended Abstracts of 54th Meeting of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, p. 306–308.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address