Algorithm to detect reconvergent fanouts in logic circuits

Access Full Text

Algorithm to detect reconvergent fanouts in logic circuits

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IEE Proceedings E (Computers and Digital Techniques) — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Testability measures have been advocated by many authors as aids in the designing and testing of logic circuits. These have been shown to be inaccurate for circuits which contain reconvergent fanouts. An algorithm is presented which will detect all sources of reconvergence in a circuit by processing a normal textual circuit description. As well as identifying all the gates at which reconvergence occurs, the reconvergent sites, the algorithm lists all the fanout nodes that reconverge at each of these sites. The automatic detection of reconvergence can be used for improving the testability analysis of circuits containing such fanouts. This algorithm is also being used as the basis of an analysis which identifies the undetectable faults in a circuit.

Inspec keywords: automatic testing; logic testing

Other keywords: testability analysis; undetectable fault identification; automatic reconvergent fanout detection; design for testability; logic circuit design; fanout nodes; textual circuit description; circuit specification

Subjects: Computer-aided logic design; Computer-aided circuit analysis and design; Digital electronics

References

    1. 1)
      • J. Savir , G.S. Ditlow , P.H. Bardell . Random pattern testability. IEEE Trans. , 79 - 90
    2. 2)
      • J. Savir . Good controllability and observability do not guarantee good testability. IEEE Trans. , 1198 - 1200
    3. 3)
      • (1976) , The TTL data book for design engineers.
    4. 4)
      • Kovijanic, P.G.: `Computer-aided testability analysis', Proceedings of International Automatic Testing Conference (Autotestcon '79), 19–21 September 1979, Minneapolis, MN, USA, p. 292–294.
    5. 5)
      • R.G. Bennetts , C.M. Maunder , G.D. Robinson . CAMELOT: a computer-aided measure for logic testability. IEE Proc. E, Comput. & Digital Tech. , 5 , 177 - 189
    6. 6)
      • Grason, J.: `TMEAS a testability measurement program', Proceedings of 16th Design Automation Conference, June 1979, San Diego, CA, USA, p. 156–161.
    7. 7)
      • Agrawal, V.D., Mercer, M.R.: `Testability measures — what do they tell us?', Proceedings of 1982 IEEE Test Conference, p. 391–396.
    8. 8)
      • Ratiu, I.M., Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A., Pederson, D.O.: `VICTOR: a fast VLSI testability analysis program', Proceedings of IEEE Test Conference, 1982, p. 397–401.
    9. 9)
      • Stephenson, J.E., Grason, J.: `A testability measure for register transfer level digital circuits', Proceedings of International Symposium on Fault tolerant computing, June 1976, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, p. 101–107.
    10. 10)
      • L.H. Goldstein . Controllability/observability analysis of digital circuits. IEEE Trans. , 685 - 693
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/ip-e.1987.0019
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/ip-e.1987.0019
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading