Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Missile longitudinal autopilot design using a new suboptimal nonlinear control method

Missile longitudinal autopilot design using a new suboptimal nonlinear control method

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IEE Proceedings - Control Theory and Applications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

A missile longitudinal autopilot is designed using a new nonlinear control synthesis technique called the θ – D approximation. The particular θ – D methodology used is referred to as the θ – DH2 design. The technique can achieve suboptimal closed-form solutions to a class of nonlinear optimal control problems in the sense that it solves the Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation approximately by adding perturbations to the cost function. An interesting feature of this method is that the expansion terms in the expression for suboptimal control are nothing but solutions to the state-dependent Riccati equations associated with this class of problems. The θ– DH2 design has the same structure as that of the linear H2 formulation except that the two Riccati equations are state dependent. Numerical simulations are presented that demonstrate the potential of this technique for use in an autopilot design. These results are compared with the recently popular SDRE H2 method.

References

    1. 1)
      • A.E. Bryson , Y.C. Ho . (1969) Applied optimal control.
    2. 2)
      • McLain, T.W., Beard, R.W.: `Nonlinear optimal control design of a missile autopilot', Presented at the AIAA Conference on Guidance, Navigation and Control, Boston, MA, August 1998.
    3. 3)
      • Mracek, C.P., Cloutier, J.R.: `Missile Longitudinal Autopilot Design Using the State-Dependent Riccati Equation Method', Presented at the Conf. on Nonlinear Problems in Aviation and Aerospace, Daytona Beach, FL, May 1996.
    4. 4)
      • R.W. Beard , G.N. Saridis , J.T. Wen . Galerkin approximations of the generalized Hamilton–Jacobi-Bellman equation. Automatica , 12 , 2156 - 2177
    5. 5)
      • Cloutier, J.R., D'Souza, C.N., Mracek, C.P.: `Nonlinear regulation and nonlinear H', Presented at the 1st Int. Conf. on Nonlinear Problems in Aviation and Aerospace, Daytona Beach, FL, May 1996.
    6. 6)
      • K. Zhou , J.C. Doyle . (1997) Essentials of robust control.
    7. 7)
      • W.L. Garrard , D.F. Enns , S.A. Snell . Nonlinear feedback control of highly manoeuverable aircraft. Int. J. Control , 799 - 812
    8. 8)
      • Xin, M., Balakrishnan, S.N.: `A new method for suboptimal control of a class of nonlinear systems', Presented at the IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, Las Vegas, Nevada, Dec. 2002.
    9. 9)
      • A. Wernli , G. Cook . Suboptimal control for the nonlinear quadratic regulator problem. Automatica , 75 - 84
    10. 10)
      • W.L. Garrard . Design of nonlinear automatic flight control systems. Automatica , 497 - 505
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/ip-cta_20030966
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/ip-cta_20030966
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address