Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Control of linear systems using piecewise continuous systems

Control of linear systems using piecewise continuous systems

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IEE Proceedings - Control Theory and Applications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

A control method is presented based on the use of piecewise continuous systems (PCS) as a control vector generator over sampling periods. The PCS has two inputs and one output which is equivalent to the control vector. Each input is corresponding to one specific time space, the first to the discrete time space defined by S = {tk, k = 0,1,2, … } and the second to the continuous time space t ∈ ℑ − S with ℑ = { t ∈ [0,∞ [ }. The control is generated in the time space ℑ. The architecture involving the PCS contains two feedback loops, based on the concept of double time and input spaces. These inputs are computed using two transformation maps Ψ and Φ defined in functions of the control strategy adopted to achieve the desired control properties. The control law depends on the PCS properties and on the method used to generate PCS controller inputs. Two examples are given: in the first the PCS controller is working in open-loop configuration during a sample period, therefore ripple is possible during sampling period. This limited control strategy assures imposed trajectory tracking only at sampling instants. In the second example the PCS is generating the control that satisfies the antiripple control strategy. The plant state is observed in continuous time and the imposed state trajectory must be compared with the plant state continuously. The PCS controller initial state is generated according to ‘optimal control’ law that minimises the quadratic criterion concerning the error-control compromise. This method appears to have several advantages over dynamic controllers: it provides control system designers with more freedom, and it requires an important computation only at the beginning of control process. Examples are given.

References

    1. 1)
      • F. Laurent . Sur la commande dum filtre linéaire par des impulsions multimodulées. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris , 288 - 289
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
      • T. Kailath . (1980) Linear systems.
    4. 4)
      • W.M. Wonham . (1976) Linear multivariable control: A geometric approach.
    5. 5)
      • F. Rotella , P. Borne . (1995) Théorie et Pratique du Calcul Matriciel.
    6. 6)
      • Vasseur, C.: `Contribution à l'étude des systèmes échantillonnés commandés par impulsions multimodulées', , PhD thesis, University Lille 1, Villeneuve dAscq, France, 1972.
    7. 7)
      • W.A. Wolovich . (1974) Linear multivariable systems.
    8. 8)
      • H.W. Bode . (1945) Network analysis and feedback amplifier design.
    9. 9)
      • T.E. Fortmannand , K.L. Hitz . (1977) An introduction to linear control systems.
    10. 10)
      • D'azzo Houpis . Linear control system analysis and design.
    11. 11)
      • T. Chen , B. Francis . (1995) Optimal sampled-data control systems.
    12. 12)
      • I.M. Horowitz . (1963) Synthesis of feedback systems.
    13. 13)
      • F.R. Gantmacher . (1990) Théorie des matrices Tome I.
    14. 14)
      • S. Urikura , A. Nagata . Ripple-free deadbeat control for sampled-data systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control , 6 , 474 - 482
    15. 15)
      • P.T. Kabamba . Control of linear systems using generalized sampled-data hold functions. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control , 9 , 772 - 783
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/ip-cta_20030964
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/ip-cta_20030964
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address