Your browser does not support JavaScript!

Dynamic systems reliability evaluation using uncertainty techniques for performance monitoring

Dynamic systems reliability evaluation using uncertainty techniques for performance monitoring

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IEE Proceedings - Control Theory and Applications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

The authors suggest the use of fuzzy measures and fuzzy integrals in evaluating the reliability of control systems by approximating an experts view on a complex system when assessing the performance. The class of systems considered have structural complexity exhibiting a closed-form model of the underlying process. The approach may be described in three parts where in the first stage a rule-based classifier (‘spy’) extracts ‘states of performance’ from the process. It is shown that the rule-premise resembles a possibility based control chart and that the possibilistic version, embedded in a rule-based system, offers a comprehensive man–process interface while having a similar or slightly improved speed of detection. The reliability can be quantified based on a finite set of abstract states over which a certainty measure is defined. A prediction for a specified reliability interval of time is done by using a qualitative model akin to Markov stochastic processes and consequently decisions are made to alter the system structure. This framework allows distinct classes of uncertainty to be considered.


    1. 1)
      • I.R. Goodman , H.T. Nguyen , E.A. Walker . (1991) Conditional inference and logic for intelligent systems: a theory ofmeasure-free conditioning.
    2. 2)
      • , : `Foundations and applications of possibility theory', Proceedings FAPT'95, 1995, World Scientific.
    3. 3)
      • N. Viswanadham , V.V.S. Sarma , M.G. Singh . (1987) Reliability of computer and control systems.
    4. 4)
      • H.T. Nguyen , M. Sugeno , R. Tong , R.R. Yager . (1995) Theoretical aspects of fuzzy control.
    5. 5)
      • D. Dubois , H. Prade . (1986) Possibility theory.
    6. 6)
      • D.A. Linkens , J. Nie . A unified real-time approximate reasoning approach for use in intelligentcontrol. Part 1. Int. J. Control , 2 , 347 - 363
    7. 7)
      • K. Hirota . Concepts of probabilistic sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. , 31 - 46
    8. 8)
      • E. Hisdal . Conditional possibilities, independence and noninteraction. Fuzzy Sets Syst. , 283 - 297
    9. 9)
      • Garcia-Sanz, M., Wolkenhauer, O., Edmunds, J.M.: `A structural approach for reliability evaluation and intelligent control', 833, CSC Report, August 1995.
    10. 10)
      • Y. Yoshida . Markov chains with a transition possibility measure and fuzzy dynamicprogramming. Fuzzy Sets Syst. , 39 - 57
    11. 11)
      • Edmunds, J.M.: `Fuzzy logic, learning and reliability', Presented the 2nd UK/Japan workshop on Fuzzy systems, September 1994, Southampton.
    12. 12)
      • D. Dubois , H. Prade . (1980) Fuzzy sets and systems: theory and applications.
    13. 13)
      • M. Garcia-Sanz , J. Florez . Adaptive optimum start-up and shut-down time controllers for heatingsystems based on a robust gradient method. IEE Proc. Control Theory Appl. , 5
    14. 14)
      • A. Papoulis . (1965) Probability, random variables, and stochastic processes.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address