Frequency-shaping LQ control of Maglev suspension systems for optimal performance with deterministic and stochastic inputs

Access Full Text

Frequency-shaping LQ control of Maglev suspension systems for optimal performance with deterministic and stochastic inputs

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IEE Proceedings - Control Theory and Applications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Methods for achieving target performance specifications for suspension controllers on low-speed Maglev vehicles using linear quadratic (LQ) control are examined. In particular, a technique involving frequency-domain weightings in the performance criterion integral to reach performance targets simultaneously for stochastic and deterministic inputs is investigated. It is shown that good performance is obtained with the added benefit of obviating the vexed problem of estimating criterion integral weightings in conventional LQG control design.

Inspec keywords: linear quadratic control; railways; magnetic levitation; frequency-domain synthesis

Other keywords: Maglev suspension systems; frequency-domain weightings; frequency-shaping LQ control; low-speed Maglev vehicles; optimal performance; target performance specifications

Subjects: Control system analysis and synthesis methods; Optimal control; Other electromagnetic device applications; Rail-traffic system control; Transportation; Optimisation techniques

References

    1. 1)
      • D.C. MacFarlane , K. Glover . A loop-shaping design procedure using H∞ synthesis. IEEE Trans. , 6 , 759 - 769
    2. 2)
      • E. Gottzein , K. Brock , E. Schneider , J. Pfefferl . Control aspects of a tracked magnetic levitation high speed test vehicle. Automatica , 205 - 223
    3. 3)
      • J.C. Doyle , K. Glover , P.P. Khargonekar , B.A. Francis . State-space solutions to standard H2 and H∞ control problems. IEEE Trans. , 8 , 831 - 847
    4. 4)
      • B.C. Fabien . Controller gain selection for an electromagnetic suspension under randomexcitation. Trans. ASME , 156 - 165
    5. 5)
      • H. Kwahernaak , R. Sivan . (1972) Linear optimal control systems.
    6. 6)
      • Taylor, D.R.D., Goodall, R.M., Oates, C.D.M.: `Theoretical and practical considerations in the design of the suspensionsystem for Birmingham Maglev', Proceedings IMechE conference on Maglev transport–now andfor the future, 1984, p. 185–192C394/84, .
    7. 7)
      • J.V.R. Prasad , A.J. Calise , E.V. Byrns . Active vibration control using fixed order dynamic compensation withfrequency shaped cost functionals. IEEE Control Mag. Syst. , 71 - 78
    8. 8)
      • Goodall, R.M., Williams, R.A.: `Dynamic criteria in the design of Maglev suspension systems', Proceedings IMechE conference on Maglev transport, 1984, Solihull, UK, p. 77–85C394, .
    9. 9)
      • J.K. Hedrick , G.F. Billington , D.A. Dreesbach . Analysis, design and optimization of high speed vehicle suspensions usingstate variable techniques. Trans. ASME , 4 , 193 - 203
    10. 10)
      • Paddison, J.E., MacLeod, C., Goodall, R.M.: `State variable constraints on the performance of optimal Maglev suspensioncontrollers', Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE conference on control appliations, 1994, Glasgow, UK.
    11. 11)
      • D.C. Karnop . Vehicle response to stochastic roadways. Veh. Syst. Dyn. , 97 - 109
    12. 12)
      • N.K. Gupta . Frequency-shaped cost-functionals: extension of linear-quadratic-Gaussiandesign methods. J. Guid. Control , 6 , 529 - 535
    13. 13)
      • Goodall, R.M.: `Suspension and guidance control system for a DC attraction Maglev vehicle', IEE Conf. Pub. 142, 1976.
    14. 14)
      • Paddison, J.E., Goodall, R.M., Bals, J., Grubel, G.: `Multi-objective design study for a Maglev suspension controller usingdata-based ANDECS-MATLEB environment', CACSD'94, 1994, 1, Tucson, AZ, p. 239–246.
    15. 15)
      • M. Nagai , S. Tanaka . Study on the dynamic stability of repulsive magnetic levitation systems. JSME Int. J. , 102 - 108
    16. 16)
      • B.D.O. Anderson , J.B. Moore . (1989) Optimal control, linear quadratic methods.
    17. 17)
      • E. Gottzein , B. Lange . Magnetic suspension control systems for the MBB high speed train. Automatica , 271 - 284
    18. 18)
      • Zhao, F., Thornton, R.: `Automatic design of a Maglev controller in state space', Proceedings of 31st Conference on Decision and Control, 1992, Tucson, AZ.
    19. 19)
      • J.B. Moore , D.L. Mingori . Robust frequency-shaped LQ control. Automatica , 5 , 641 - 646
    20. 20)
      • H.A. Yao , J.K. Hedrick , K.K.D. Young . (1993) Adaptive sliding mode control of a magnetic suspension system, Variable structure control for robotics and aerospace applications.
    21. 21)
      • , : Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Magnetic Bearings, 1994, Zurich, Switzerland.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/ip-cta_19960057
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/ip-cta_19960057
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading