Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Neural approach to detecting communication network events

Neural approach to detecting communication network events

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IEE Proceedings - Communications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

The Internet and associated network technologies are an increasingly integral part of modern day working practices. With this increase in use comes an increase in dependence. For some time, commentators have noted that given the level of reliance on data networks, there is a paucity of monitoring tools and techniques to support them. As this area is addressed, more data regarding network performance becomes available. However, a need to automatically analyse and interpret this performance data now becomes imperative. The paper takes one-way latency as an example performance metric. The term ‘data exception’ is employed to describe delay data that is unusual or unexpected. Data exceptions can be used by network operators to assess the effect of network modifications, failures and usage, and can also help in the diagnosis of intermittent network faults. Automating the detection of data exceptions is a non-trivial process that is not well suited to a rule-based solution. The paper shows that data exceptions can be identified by the use of a two-stage approach. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test can initially be applied to detect general changes in the delay distribution, a neural network can then be used to categorise the change. The approach is evaluated using a network simulation.

References

    1. 1)
      • W. Matthews , L. Cottrell . The PingER Project: active Internet performance monitoring for the HENP community. IEEE Commun. Mag. , 5 , 130 - 136
    2. 2)
      • Uijterwaal, H.: `RIPE test traffic project internet delay measurements using test traffic: First results', Proceedings of 1st International SANE Conference, SANE’98, November 1998, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
    3. 3)
      • H.R. Neave , P.L. Worthington . (1988) Distribution-free tests.
    4. 4)
      • Phillips, I.W., Sandford, M., Parish, D.J.: `Processing network delay measurements into network events', Proceedings of networks operation and management symposium, NOMS 2000, April 2000, p. 955–956.
    5. 5)
      • Mcgregor, T., Braun, H.-W.: `Automated event detection for active measurement systems', Presented at Passive and Active measurements, PAM 2001, April 2001, Amsterdam.
    6. 6)
      • T. Mcgregor , H.-W. Braun , J. Brown . The NLANR network analysis infrastructure. IEEE Commun. Mag. , 5 , 122 - 128
    7. 7)
      • T. Chen . Network traffic measurements and experiments. IEEE Commun. Mag.
    8. 8)
      • W.E. Leland , M.S. Taqqu , W. Willinger , D.V. Wilson . On the self-similar nature of ethernet traffic (Extended version). IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. , 1 , 1 - 14
    9. 9)
      • Phillips, I.W., Tunnicliffe, M.J., Parish, D.J., Rodgers, C.: `On the monitoring and measurement of quality of service of superjanet', Proceedings of IEE 13th UK Teletraffic Symposium, March 1996, Strathclyde, UK, p. 16/1–16/9.
    10. 10)
      • L. Faucett . (1994) Fundamentals of neural networks: architectures, algorithms and applications.
    11. 11)
      • L. Tarassenko . (1998) A guide to neural computing applications.
    12. 12)
      • Kalidindi, S., Zekauskas, M.J.: `Surveyor: an infrastructure for internet performance measurements', Proceedings of Internet and networking, INET’99, June 1999, San Jose.
    13. 13)
      • V. Paxon , J. Mahdavi , A. Adams , M. Mathis . An architecture for large-scale internet measurement. IEEE Commun. Mag. , 8 , 48 - 54
    14. 14)
      • K. Claffy , T. Monk . What's next for data analysis? Status and challenges facing the community. Proc. IEEE , 10 , 1563 - 1571
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/ip-com_20020419
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/ip-com_20020419
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address