Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Built-in self-repair techniques for embedded RAMs

Built-in self-repair techniques for embedded RAMs

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Add to cart
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)
Add to cart

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IEE Proceedings - Computers and Digital Techniques — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

IEE
Published

An efficient built-in self-repair approach, column-block-level reconfiguration methodology, is proposed. It is based on the concept of divided bit-line (DBL) for high-capacity memories including SRAMs and DRAMs, widely used in low-power memory designs. However, the inherent characteristics (two or more memory cells are combined together to divide the bit-line into several sub bit-lines) of divided bit-line memories have not been used for fault-tolerant applications. Therefore the column_block_repair (CBR) fault-tolerant architecture is proposed based on the structure of DBL for high-capacity memories. The redundant columns of a memory array are divided into column blocks and reconfiguration is performed at the column block level instead of the traditional column level. The fault-tolerant architecture can improve the yield for memory fabrication significantly. Moreover, the characteristics of low power and fast access time of DBL memories are also preserved. The reconfiguration mechanism of the CBR architecture requires negligible hardware overhead. According to experimental results, the hardware overheads are less than 0.58% and 0.012% for 256-Kbit SRAMs and 8-Mbit DRAMs, respectively. The repair rate of the approach is compared with previous memory repair algorithms. It is found that the CBR approach improves the repair rate significantly. The yield improvement over traditional column-based approaches is also analysed. Simulated results show that the present approach can significantly improve fabrication yield.

Inspec keywords: fault tolerant computing; circuit reliability; reconfigurable architectures; built-in self test; DRAM chips; SRAM chips

Other keywords: DRAM; column-based approaches; memory fabrication; divided bit-line memories; divided bit-line; built-in self-repair techniques; SRAM; column-block-level reconfiguration methodology; fault-tolerant applications; high-capacity memories; experimental results; low-power memory designs; embedded RAM; fabrication yield; hardware overhead

Subjects: Semiconductor storage; Memory circuits; Digital circuit design, modelling and testing; Logic design methods

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
      • Nakahara, S., Higeta, K., Kohno, M., Kawamura, T., Kakitani, K.: `Built-in self test for GHz embedded SRAMs using flexible pattern generator and new repair algorithm', Proc. Int. Test Conf., October 1999, Washington, DC, p. 301–310.
    3. 3)
      • Mazumder, P., Yih, J.S.: `A novel built-in self-repair approach to VLSI memory yield enhancement', Proc. of Int. Test Conf., October 1990, Washington, DC, p. 833–841.
    4. 4)
      • Karandikar, A., Parhi, K.K.: `Low-power SRAM design using hierarchical divided bit-line approach', Proc. Int. Conf. on Computer design, Oct. 1998, Austin, TX, p. 82–88.
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
      • K.J. Schultz , R.G. Gibbins , J.S. Fujimoto , R.S. Philips , G.F.R. Gibson , A.L. Silburt . Low-supply-noise low-power embedded modular SRAM. IEEE Proc., Circuits, Devices Syst. , 73 - 82
    7. 7)
      • R. Treuer , V.K. Agrawal . Built-in self diagnosis for repairable embedded RAMs. IEEE Design Test Comput. , 24 - 33
    8. 8)
      • J.E. Price . A new look at yield of integrated circuits. Proc. IEEE , 8 , 1290 - 1291
    9. 9)
      • Zarrineh, K., Upadhyaya, J.: `On programmable memory built-in self-test architectures', Proc. of IEEE Conf. on Design, automation and test in Europe, Munich, Mar. 1999, p. 708–713.
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
      • M. Sachdev . (1998) Defect-oriented testing for CMOS analog and digital circuits.
    12. 12)
      • Nelson, E., Dreibelbis, J.: `Test and repair of large embedded DRAMs: Part 2', Proc. Int. Test Conf., October 2001, Washington, DC, p. 173–181.
    13. 13)
      • M. Margala . Low-power SRAM circuit design. Memory Technol., Design Test , 115 - 122
    14. 14)
      • Moore, G.E.: `Progress in digital integrated electronics', Proc. IEEE Int. Electron Devices Meet., 1975, San Jose, CA, p. 11–13.
    15. 15)
      • Schober, V., Paul, S., Picot, O.: `Memory built-in self repair using redundant words', Proc. Int. Test Conf., October 2001, Washington, DC, p. 995–1001.
    16. 16)
      • C.T. Huang , J.R. Huang , C.F. Wu , C.W. Wu , T.Y. Chang . A programmable BIST core for embedded DRAM. IEEE Des. Test Comput. , 59 - 70
    17. 17)
      • Kim, H.C., Yi, D.S., Park, J.Y., Cho, C.H.: `A BISR (built-in self-repair) circuit for embedded memory with multiple redundancies', Proc. Int. Conf. on VLSI and CAD, Oct. 1999, Seoul, p. 602–605.
    18. 18)
      • Kim, I., Zorian, Y., Komoriya, G., Pham, H., Higgins, F.P., Lewandowski, J.L.: `Built in self repair for embedded high-density SRAM', Proc. Int. Test Conf., October 1998, Washington, DC, p. 1112–1119.
    19. 19)
      • M. Yoshimoto , K. Anami , H. Shinohara , T. Yoshihara , H. Takagi , S. Nagao , S. Kayano , T. Nakano . A divided word-line structure in static RAM and its application to a 64K full CMOS RAM. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits , 5 , 479 - 485
    20. 20)
      • B.W. Johnson . (1989) Design and analysis of fault-tolerant digital system.
    21. 21)
      • S.Y. Kuo , W.K. Fuchs . Efficient spare allocation in reconfigurable arrays. IEEE Design Test Comput. , 24 - 31
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
      • M. Franklin , K.K. Saluja . Embedded RAM testing. Proc. IEEE Int. Workshop on Memory technology, design and testing, San Jose, CA , 29 - 33
    24. 24)
      • M. Hpriguchi , J. Etoh , M. Aoki , K. Itoh , T. Matsumoto . A flexible redundancy technique for high-density DRAM's. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits , 1 , 12 - 17
    25. 25)
      • B. Prince . (1997) Semiconductor memories: a handbook of design, manufacture, and application.
    26. 26)
      • Erso (Lin, M.K.): ‘1997 semiconductor industry annual report’. ITRS project report, Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI), Hsinchu, Taiwan, June 1997.
    27. 27)
      • A.J. Goor , Van de . (1996) Testing semiconductor memories – theory and practice.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/ip-cdt_20030687
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/ip-cdt_20030687
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
Print this page
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address