Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Designing robust asynchronous circuit components

Designing robust asynchronous circuit components

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IEE Proceedings - Circuits, Devices and Systems — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Asynchronous circuits require components that display hazard-free operation under normal input conditions. In addition, quasi-delay-insensitive circuits are based on the assumption of isochronic forks, an assumption that can in practice be compromised by threshold variations due to the use of, for example, dynamic or pseudo-dynamic C-gate circuits. In the paper, the authors investigate the severity of these problems in practical circuits. It is shown that threshold variations are much less significant than has previously been assumed, but hazard-free operation is, by contrast, a much more significant problem. Gates with a stack of transistors in series can exhibit charge-sharing problems under specific input sequences that expose hazards that are not evident in the logic description. A design methodology is proposed which overcomes the charge-sharing problem, resulting in more robust circuits.

References

    1. 1)
      • Nagel, L.W., Pederson, D.O.: `Simulation program with integrated circuit emphasis (SPICE)', ERLM383, 1983.
    2. 2)
      • V.G. Oklobdzija , R.K. Montoye . Design-performance trade-offs in CMOS-domino logic. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits , 2 , 304 - 306
    3. 3)
      • C.Y. Chu , M.A. Horowitz . Charge-sharing models for switch-level simulation. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. , 6 , 1053 - 1061
    4. 4)
      • C.H. van Berkel . Beware the isochronic fork. Integr. VLSI J. , 3 , 103 - 129
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
      • Garside, J.D., Furber, S.B., Chung, S.-H.: `AMULET3 revealed', Proceedings of Async’99, 19–21 April 1999, Barcelona, Spain, p. 51–59.
    7. 7)
      • J. Sparsø , S. Furber . (2001) Principles of asynchronous circuit design: a systems perspective.
    8. 8)
      • Martin, A.J.: `The limitations to delay-insensitivity in asynchronous circuits', Proceedings of 6th MIT Conference on Advanced research in VLSI, 1990, MIT Press, p. 263–278.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/ip-cds_20030349
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/ip-cds_20030349
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address