Energy-efficient medium access control and routing protocol for multihop wireless sensor networks

Energy-efficient medium access control and routing protocol for multihop wireless sensor networks

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Wireless Sensor Systems — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

This work presents a combined energy-efficient medium access control (MAC) and routing protocol for large-scale wireless sensor networks that aims to minimise energy consumption and prolong the network lifetime. The proposed communication framework employs the following measures to enhance the network energy efficiency. Firstly, it provides an adaptive intra-cluster schedule to arbitrate media access of sensor nodes within a cluster, minimising idle listening on sensor nodes, leading to improved energy performance. Secondly, it proposes an on-demand source cross-layer routing protocol ensuring selection of best routes based on energy level and channel quality indicator for the multihop inter-cluster data transmission. Lastly, an unequal cluster size technique based on cluster head residual energy and distance away from the base station is utilised. This technique balances the energy among clusters and avoids early network partitioning. This work further presents the analytical performance model for energy consumption and delay of the proposed communication framework. The performance measures used for evaluation are energy consumption, delay, and network lifetime. The results indicate that combining routing and MAC schemes conserves energy better than utilising MAC scheme alone.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Demirkol, I., Ersoy, C., Alagoz, F.: ‘MAC protocols for wireless sensor networks: a survey’, IEEE Commun. Mag., 2006, 44, pp. 115121.
    2. 2)
      • 2. Heinzelman, W.B., Chandrakasan, A.P., Balakrishnan, H.: ‘An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks’, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., 2002, 1, pp. 660670.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Ibriq, J., Mahgoub, I.: ‘Cluster-based routing in wireless sensor networks: issues and challenges’. SPECTS, 2004, pp. 759766.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Gama, S., Walingo, T., Takawira, F.: ‘Energy analysis for the distributed receiver based cooperative MAC for wireless sensor networks’, IET Wirel. Sensor Syst., 2015, 5, (4), pp. 193203.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Pei, G., Chien, C.: ‘Low power TDMA in large wireless sensor networks’. Military Communications Conf., 2001. MILCOM 2001. Communications for Network-Centric Operations: Creating the Information Force. IEEE, 2001, pp. 347351.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Lazarou, G.Y., Li, J., Picone, J.: ‘A cluster-based power-efficient MAC scheme for event-driven sensing applications’, Ad Hoc Netw., 2007, 5, pp. 10171030.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Hsu, T.-H., Yen, P.-Y.: ‘Adaptive time division multiple access-based medium access control protocol for energy conserving and data transmission in wireless sensor networks’, IET Commun., 2011, 5, pp. 26622672.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Johnson, D.B., Maltz, D.A.: ‘Dynamic source routing in ad hoc wireless networks’, in Imielinski, T., Korth, H.F. (Eds.): ‘Mobile computing’ vol. 353 (The Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, Boston, MA, 1996), pp. 153181.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Perkins, C.E., Royer, E.M.: ‘Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing’. Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, 1999. Proc. WMCSA'99, 1999, pp. 90100.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Li, C., Ye, M., Chen, G., et al: ‘An energy-efficient unequal clustering mechanism for wireless sensor networks’. IEEE Int. Conf. on Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems Conf., 2005, pp. 8604.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Gong, B., Li, L., Wang, S., et al: ‘Multihop routing protocol with unequal clustering for wireless sensor networks’. ISECS Int. Colloquium on Computing, Communication, Control, and Management, 2008. CCCM'08, 2008, pp. 552556.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Tunca, C., Isik, S., Donmez, M.Y., et al: ‘Ring routing: an energy-efficient routing protocol for wireless sensor networks with a mobile sink’, IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput., 2015, 9, pp. 19471960.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Hayes, T., Ali, F.H.: ‘Location aware sensor routing protocol for mobile wireless sensor networks’, IET Wirel. Sensor Syst., 2016, 6, (2), pp. 4957.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Farooq, M.O., Kunz, T.: ‘Impact of route length on the performance of routing and flow admission control algorithms in wireless sensor networks’, IET Wirel. Sensor Syst., 2016, 6, (1), pp. 1016.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Akhavan, M.R., Aijaz, A., Choobkar, S., et al: ‘On the multi-hop performance of receiver based MAC protocol in routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks-based low power and lossy wireless sensor networks’, IET Wirel. Sensor Syst., 2015, 5, (1), pp. 4249.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Kremer, W.: ‘Data transmission characteristics in short range inter-vehicle communication system (IVCS)’. IEEE 42nd Vehicular Technology Conf., 1992, pp. 298302.
    17. 17)
      • 17. Hayashida, Y., Maeda, A., Sugimachi, N., et al: ‘Performance analysis of go-back-N ARQ scheme with selective repeat in intra-block’, IEEE Trans.Commun., 2002, 50, pp. 391395.
    18. 18)
      • 18. Haider, A., Harris, R.: ‘A novel proportional fair scheduling algorithm for HSDPA in UMTS networks’. The 2nd Int. Conf. on Wireless Broadband and Ultra Wideband Communications, 2007. AusWireless 2007, 2007, pp. 4343.
    19. 19)
      • 19. Karjee, J., Jamadagni, H.: ‘Energy aware node selection for cluster-based data accuracy estimation in wireless sensor networks’, Int. J. Adv. Netw. Appl., 2012, 3, (5), pp. 13111322.
    20. 20)
      • 20. Yang, O., Heinzelman, W.B.: ‘Modeling and performance analysis for duty-cycled MAC protocols with applications to S-MAC and X-MAC’, IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., 2012, 11, (6), pp. 905921.
    21. 21)
      • 21. Shynk, J.J.: ‘Probability, random variables, and random processes: theory and signal processing applications’ (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA, 2012).
    22. 22)
      • 22. Ikki, S., Ahmed, M.H.: ‘Performance analysis of incremental-relaying cooperative-diversity networks over Rayleigh fading channels’, IET Commun., 2011, 5, pp. 337349.
    23. 23)
      • 23. Massaro, M.: ‘The distribution of error probability for Rayleigh fading and Gaussian noise’, IEEE Trans. Commun., 1974, 22, pp. 18561858.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address