Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Assessment of a low-profile planar antenna for a wireless sensor network monitoring the local water distribution network

This study presents an assessment on the suitability of a low-profile planar antenna for a wireless sensor network (WSN) application monitoring the water supply at fire hydrants (FHs). The antenna must have a low profile so that it can be mounted on the FH lid; it must have an omnidirectional radiation pattern so that it can communicate with base stations at low elevations; and it must operate in the 2.4 GHz industrial, scientific and medical (ISM) band. Measurements show that for the majority of the 2.4 GHz ISM band, the antenna has a return loss of at least −10 dB and efficiency greater than 60%. For the FH WSN assessment, the antenna was deployed as a transmitter mounted on the FH lid above the underground FH chamber and a vertically polarised monopole antenna mounted on a mast at various specified heights above ground level was used to measure the received power as a function of distance. The path loss results were compared with those from a previous deployment, where the FH antenna was located in the FH chamber, and it is found that using the low-profile antenna reduced the path loss by at least 10 dB over the measured transmitter and receiver separation.

References

    1. 1)
      • 10. Loh, T., Alexander, M., Widmer, F., Miller, P., Knight, D.: ‘Validation of a new small-antenna radiated testing range’. Third European Conf. on Antennas and Propagation, 2009, EuCAP 2009, March 2009, pp. 699703.
    2. 2)
      • 1. Lin, M., Wu, Y., Wassell, I.: ‘Wireless sensor network: water distribution monitoring system’. IEEE Radio and Wireless Symp., 2008, January 2008, pp. 775778.
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
      • 4. IEEE Standard 802.15.4’. Available at: http://www.standards.ieee.org/findstds/standard/802.15.4-2011.html.
    5. 5)
      • 9. Chandran, A., Conway, G., Scanlon, W.: ‘Compact slot-loaded patch antenna for 868 MHz wireless body area networks’. Antennas and Propagation Conf., 2008, LAPC 2008, Loughborough, March 2008, pp. 433436.
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
      • 11. Loh, T.H., Alexander, M.: ‘New facility for minimally invasive measurements of electrically small antennas’. Antennas and Propagation Conf., 2008, LAPC 2008, Loughborough, March 2008, pp. 313316.
    8. 8)
      • 5. Memsic MICAz’. Available at: http://www.memsic.com/wireless-sensor-networks/.
    9. 9)
      • 15. Lin, M.: ‘Channel modelling for wireless sensor networks’. Ph.D. dissertation, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, 2009.
    10. 10)
      • 14. Parsons, J.D.: ‘The mobile propagation channel’ (John Wiley and Sons, 2000).
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
      • 7. Conway, G., Scanlon, W., Linton, D.: ‘Low-profile microstrip patch antenna for over-body surface communication at 2.45 GHz’. IEEE 65th Vehicular Technology Conf., 2007, VTC2007–Spring, April 2007, pp. 392396.
    13. 13)
      • 3. Garcia, A., Tose, T., Ramalho, L., Sicari, D.: ‘Wireless sensor networks zigbee applied on sewage treatment station’. IET Conf. on Wireless Sensor Systems (WSS 2012), June 2012, pp. 15.
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
      • 12. CST microwave studio’. Available at: http://www.cst.com.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-wss.2014.0047
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-wss.2014.0047
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address