Energy-aware interleaving for robust image transmission over visual sensor networks

Energy-aware interleaving for robust image transmission over visual sensor networks

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Wireless Sensor Systems — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

In wireless visual sensor networks, the effect of transmission losses on the visual quality of images is always varying and depends on the burst loss length. Among the existing transmission error control techniques, interleaving can improve the visual quality of images without redundant data incurred. Conventionally a larger interleaving data size will be more effective in converting long burst loss into isolated losses. This is at the cost of transmitting more pixels. But how to effectively reduce individual sensor's data load in an energy-constrained distributed transmission network is still an unsolved issue. An energy-aware interleaving algorithm is proposed to regulate burst loss effects by spreading out packets according to each image region's pre-calculated transmission income. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed scheme can not only improve the end-to-end image transmission quality, but also prolong the lifetime of visual sensor network.


    1. 1)
      • Cucchiara, R.: `Multimedia surveillance systems', Proc. Third ACM Int. Conf. on Video Surveillance and Sensor Networks (VSSN'05), November 2005, Singapore, p. 1–10.
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
      • Hengstler, S., Prashanth, D., Fong, S., Aghajan, H.: `MeshEye: a hybrid-resolution smart camera mote for applications in distributed intelligent surveillance', Proc. Sixth Int. Conf. on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN '07), April 2007, Massachusetts, USA, p. 360–369.
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
      • Xinguang, X., Debin, Z., Qiang, W.: `A novel error concealment method for stereoscopic video coding', Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Image Processing (ICIP’07), September 2007, San Antonio, USA, p. 101–104.
    9. 9)
      • Ma, H.D., Liu, Y.H.: `Correlation based video processing in video sensor networks', Proc. 2005 Int. Conf. on Wireless Networks, Communications and Mobile Computing, June 2005, Maui, USA, p. 987–992.
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
      • Ferrigno, L., Marano, S., Paciello, V.: `Balancing computational and transmission power consumption in wireless image sensor networks', Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Virtual Environments, Human–Computer Interfaces, and Measurement Systems, July 2005, Giardini Naxos, Italy, p. 61–66.
    12. 12)
      •, accessed June 2010.
    13. 13)
      • Alec, W., Terence, T., David, C.: `Taming the underlying challenges of reliable multihop routing in sensor networks', Proc. First Int. Conf. on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys '03), November 2003, Los Angeles, USA, p. 14–27.
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
      • Cristian, D.F., Vincent, L.: `Error resilient image communication with chaotic pixel interleaving for wireless camera sensors', Proc. Third Conf. on Real-World Wireless Sensor Networks (REALWSN’08), April 2008, Glasgow, United Kingdom, p. 21–25.
    20. 20)
      • Rahimi, M., Baer, R., Iroezi, O.I.: `Cyclops: in situ image sensing and interpretation in wireless sensor networks', Proc. Third ACM Conf. on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys’05), November 2005, San Diego, CA, p. 192–204.
    21. 21)
      • Soro, S., Heinzelman, W.B.: `On the coverage problem in video-based wireless sensor networks', Proc. Second Int. Conf. on Broadband Networks (BROADNETS '05), October 2005, Boston, USA, p. 9–16.
    22. 22)
      • Stanislav, F., Carlos, G., Mark, P.: `Distributed localization of networked cameras', Proc. Fifth Int. Conf. on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN’06), April 2006, Nashville, USA, p. 34–42.
    23. 23)
      • Shih, E., Cho, S.H., Ickes, N.: `Physical layer driven protocol and algorithm design for energy-efficient wireless sensor networks', Proc. Seventh Annual Int. Conf. on Mobile Computing and Networking (MOBICOM’01), July 2001, Rome, Italy, p. 272–287.
    24. 24)

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address