Mobility-based clustering protocol for wireless sensor networks with mobile nodes

Mobility-based clustering protocol for wireless sensor networks with mobile nodes

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Wireless Sensor Systems — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

In this study, the authors propose a mobility-based clustering (MBC) protocol for wireless sensor networks with mobile nodes. In the proposed clustering protocol, a sensor node elects itself as a cluster-head based on its residual energy and mobility. A non-cluster-head node aims at its link stability with a cluster head during clustering according to the estimated connection time. Each non-cluster-head node is allocated a timeslot for data transmission in ascending order in a time division multiple address (TDMA) schedule based on the estimated connection time. In the steady-state phase, a sensor node transmits its sensed data in its timeslot and broadcasts a joint request message to join in a new cluster and avoid more packet loss when it has lost or is going to lose its connection with its cluster head. Simulation results show that the MBC protocol can reduce the packet loss by 25% compared with the cluster-based routing (CBR) protocol and 50% compared with the low-energy adaptive clustering hierarchy-mobile (LEACH-mobile) protocol. Moreover, it outperforms both the CBR protocol and the LEACH-mobile protocol in terms of average energy consumption and average control overhead, and can better adapt to a highly mobile environment.


    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
      • Y. Zhang , H. Dai . Energy-efficiency and transmission strategy selection in cooperative wireless sensor networks. J. Commun. Netw. , 4 , 1 - 9
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
      • Kim, D.S., Chung, Y.J.: `Self-organization routing protocol supporting mobile nodes for wireless sensor network', Proc. First Int. Multi-Symp. on Computer and Computational Sciences, June 2006, Hangzhou, China, p. 622–626.
    12. 12)
      • Santhosh, G.K., Vinu, P.M., Poulose, K.J.: `Mobility metric based LEACH-mobile protocol', Proc. 16th Int. Conf. on Advanced Computing and Communications, December 2008, San Francisco, American, p. 248–253.
    13. 13)
      • Lan, T.N., Xavier, D., Razvan, B.: `An energy efficient routing scheme for mobile wireless sensor networks', Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. on Wireless Communication Systems, October 2008, Reykjavik, Iceland, p. 568–572.
    14. 14)
      • Samer, A.B., CheeK, N.K., Mohd, F.R.: `Cluster based routing protocol for mobile nodes in wireless sensor network', Proc. Third Int. Conf. on Quality of Service in Heterogeneous Wired/Wireless Networks, August 2006, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, p. 233–241.
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
      • Van, G.J., Rabacy, J.: `Lightweight time synchronization for sensor networks', Proc. Second ACM Int. Conf. on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications, September 2003, San Diego, Canada, p. 11–19.
    17. 17)
      • Zhang, X.B., Wang, H.P., Kokhar, A.: `An energy-efficient data collection protocol for mobile sensor networks', Proc. IEEE 64th Vehicular Technology Conf., September 2006, Montreal, Canada, p. 1–5.
    18. 18)
      • Lazos, L., Radha, P., Capkun, S.: `ROPE: robust position estimation in wireless sensor networks', Proc. Fourth Int. Symp. on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, April 2005, Los Angeles, California, American, p. 324–331.
    19. 19)
      • Cerpa, A., Estrin, D.: `ASCENT: adaptive self-configuring sensor networks topologies', Proc. 11th Joint Conf. on IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, June 2002, New York, American, p. 1278–1287.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address