Your browser does not support JavaScript!

Accounting for randomness in measurement and sampling in studying cancer cell population dynamics

Accounting for randomness in measurement and sampling in studying cancer cell population dynamics

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Systems Biology — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Knowing the expected temporal evolution of the proportion of different cell types in sample tissues gives an indication about the progression of the disease and its possible response to drugs. Such systems have been modelled using Markov processes. We here consider an experimentally realistic scenario in which transition probabilities are estimated from noisy cell population size measurements. Using aggregated data of FACS measurements, we develop MMSE and ML estimators and formulate two problems to find the minimum number of required samples and measurements to guarantee the accuracy of predicted population sizes. Our numerical results show that the convergence mechanism of transition probabilities and steady states differ widely from the real values if one uses the standard deterministic approach for noisy measurements. This provides support for our argument that for the analysis of FACS data one should consider the observed state as a random variable. The second problem we address is about the consequences of estimating the probability of a cell being in a particular state from measurements of small population of cells. We show how the uncertainty arising from small sample sizes can be captured by a distribution for the state probability.


    1. 1)
      • 16. Grima, R.: ‘Intrinsic biochemical noise in crowded intracellular conditions’, J. Chem. Phys., 2010, 132, (18), pp. 19.
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
      • 33. Tkacik, G.: ‘From statistical mechanics to information theory: understanding biophysical information-processing systems’, 2010, pp. 152, arXiv:1006.4291v1[q-bio.MN].
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
      • 11. Zapperi, S., La Porta, C.A.M.: ‘Do cancer cells undergo phenotypic switching? The case for imperfect cancer stem cell markers’, Sci. Rep., UK, 2012, 2, pp. 17.
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
    28. 28)
      • 30. Adams, D.S., Levin, M.: ‘General principles for measuring resting membrane potential and ion concentration using fluorescent bioelectricity reporters’, Cold Spring Harb. Protoc., 2012, 2012, (4), pp. 385397.
    29. 29)
    30. 30)
    31. 31)
    32. 32)
    33. 33)
      • 19. Yen-Chen Fu, A.: ‘Microfabricated fluorescence-activated cell sorters (mu FACS) for screening bacterial cells’ (California Institute of Technology, 2002).

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address