Best linear unbiased estimator approach for time-of-arrival based localisation

Best linear unbiased estimator approach for time-of-arrival based localisation

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Signal Processing — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

A common technique for source localisation is to utilise the time-of-arrival (TOA) measurements between the source and several spatially separated sensors. The TOA information defines a set of circular equations from which the source position can be calculated with the knowledge of the sensor positions. Apart from nonlinear optimisation, least squares calibration (LSC) and linear least squares (LLS) are two computationally simple positioning alternatives which reorganise the circular equations into a unique and non-unique set of linear equations, respectively. As the LSC and LLS algorithms employ standard least squares (LS), an obvious improvement is to utilise weighted LS estimation. In the paper, it is proved that the best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE) version of the LLS algorithm will give identical estimation performance as long as the linear equations correspond to the independent set. The equivalence of the BLUE-LLS approach and the BLUE variant of the LSC method is analysed. Simulation results are also included to show the comparative performance of the BLUE-LSC, BLUE-LLS, LSC, LLS and constrained weighted LSC methods with Cramér–Rao lower bound.


    1. 1)
      • J.B. Tsui . (2000) Fundamentals of global positioning system receivers.
    2. 2)
      • J.J. Caffery . (2000) Wireless location in CDMA cellular radio systems.
    3. 3)
      • S.L. Gay , J. Benesty . (2000) Acoustic signal processing for telecommunication.
    4. 4)
      • N. Patwari , J.N. Ash , S. Kyperountas , A.O. Hero , R.L. Moses , N.S. Correal . Locating the nodes: cooperative localization in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. , 4 , 54 - 69
    5. 5)
      • M.A. Spirito . On the accuracy of cellular mobile station location estimation. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. , 674 - 685
    6. 6)
      • J.J. Caffery , G.L. Stuber . Subscriber location in CDMA cellular networks. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. , 406 - 416
    7. 7)
      • J.O. Smith , J.S. Abel . Closed-form least-squares source location estimation from range difference measurements. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. , 1661 - 1669
    8. 8)
      • B. Friedlander . A passive localization algorithm and its accuracy analysis. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. , 234 - 245
    9. 9)
      • J.C. Chen , R.E. Hudson , K. Yao . Maximum-likelihood source localization and unknown sensor location estimation for wideband signals in the near field. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , 8 , 1843 - 1854
    10. 10)
      • A.J. Fenwick . Algorithms for position fixing using pulse arrival times. IEE Proc., Radar Sonar Navig. , 4 , 208 - 212
    11. 11)
      • Caffery, J.J.: `A new approach to the geometry of TOA location', Proc. IEEE VTC 2000-Fall, 2000, 4, p. 1943–1949.
    12. 12)
      • S.M. Kay . (1993) Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory.
    13. 13)
      • Coutts, S.D.: `3-D emitter localization using inhomogeneous bistatic scattering', Proc. Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, March 1999, Phoenix, USA, 3, p. 1509–1512.
    14. 14)
      • K.W. Cheung , H.C. So , W.-K. Ma , Y.T. Chan . Least squares algorithms for time-of-arrival based mobile location. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , 4 , 1121 - 1128
    15. 15)
      • McGuire, M., Plataniotis, K.N.: `A comparison of radiolocation for mobile terminals by distance measurements', Proc. Int. Conf. Wireless Communications, 2000, p. 1356–1359.
    16. 16)
      • A. Urruela , J. Sala , J. Riba . Average performance analysis of circular and hyberbolic geolocation. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. , 1 , 52 - 66
    17. 17)
      • C. Andersson . (2001) GPRS and 3G wireless applications: professional developer's guide.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address