http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Exploring dynamic difficulty adjustment mechanism for rehabilitation tasks using physiological measures and subjective ratings

Exploring dynamic difficulty adjustment mechanism for rehabilitation tasks using physiological measures and subjective ratings

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy eFirst article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Signal Processing — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Task engagement is a key factor in sustaining patients’ participation in rehabilitation. Adaptive task difficulty level adjustment techniques are designed to determine the appropriate exercise difficulty level in where subjects are appropriately challenged and engaged without causing any distress. Such adaptive difficulty adjustment within rehabilitation tasks has the potential to individualise training. In this study, the authors have compared two dynamic difficulty level adjustment algorithms, partially ordered set master (POSM) and increment/decrement one level (IDOL), those change the difficulty levels for each individual adaptively based on his/her performance. These two algorithms are integrated into the robot-assisted rehabilitation system, RehabRoby, and their functionality is explored via a small user study with 20 healthy subjects. The subjects were asked to perform a computer-based fruit picker game using RehabRoby under these two algorithms. The impacts of the adaptation algorithms are evaluated in terms of engagement of the subjects by looking at their physiological signals, performance (score), and survey results. Experiments show that although POSM on the average suggests easier difficulty levels to the subjects than IDOL, the subjects experience a wider range of difficulty levels in POSM that may help them to become more engaged in the game, which can also be observed by lower skin temperatures of the subjects.

http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-spr.2018.5241
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-spr.2018.5241
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address