Mainlobe interference suppression based on independent component analysis in passive bistatic radar

Mainlobe interference suppression based on independent component analysis in passive bistatic radar

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Signal Processing — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

The mainlobe interference is a noticeable issue in the passive bistatic radar (PBR). Because the direction of arrival of interference is close to the target echo, the mainlobe interference can hardly be suppressed effectively by the conventional method. The mainlobe interference will mask the low-level targets of interest, and the blind area of detection will be formed in the direction of the interference source. The mainlobe interference signals, which come from the unrelated transmitters can be assumed to be mutually independent on the statistics. In this study, the method based on the independent component analysis (ICA) is proposed to suppress the mainlobe interference. The method exploits the principal components analysis to extract the mainlobe interference components which are whitened and compressed. Then, the ICA based on the negentropy is applied to separate the mainlobe interference components for the samples in the time domain. The mainlobe interference can be suppressed by the extensive cancellation algorithm with the separated interference sample as the reference. The proposed method based on the ICA is able to suppress the multiple mainlobe interferences and improve the performance of detection in the PBR. The simulation results prove the feasibility of the method proposed in this study.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Howland, P.: ‘Passive radar systems’, IEE Proc., Radar Sonar Navig., 2005, 152, (3), pp. 105106.
    2. 2)
      • 2. Colone, F., Bongioanni, C., Lombardo, P.: ‘Multifrequency integration in FM radio-based passive bistatic radar. PartⅠ: target detection’, IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag., 2013, 28, (4), pp. 2839.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Colone, F., Bongioanni, C., Lombardo, P.: ‘Multifrequency integration in FM radio-based passive bistatic radar. Part Ⅱ: target direction of arrival estimation’, IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag., 2013, 28, (4), pp. 4047.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Edrich, M., Schroeder, A., Meyer, F.: ‘Design and performance evaluation of a mature FM/DAB/DVB-T multi-illuminator passive radar system’, IET Radar Sonar Navig., 2014, 8, (2), pp. 114122.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Chenguang, S, Sana, S, Fei, W., et al: ‘Modified Cramér-Rao lower bounds for joint position and velocity estimation of a Rician target in OFDM-based passive radar networks’, Radio Sci., 2017, 52, (1), pp. 1533.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Chenguang, S, Fei, W, Jianjiang, Z.: ‘Cramér-Rao bound analysis for joint target location and velocity estimation in frequency modulation based passive radar networks’, IET Signal Process., 2016, 10, (7), pp. 780790.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Chenguang, S, Fei, W, Sana, S., et al: ‘Performance analysis for joint target parameter estimation in UMTS-based passive multistatic radar with antenna arrays using modified modified Cramér-Rao lower bounds’, Sensors, 2017, 17, (10), p. 2379, doi: 10.3390/s17102379.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Dai, H., Wang, X., Li, Y., et al: ‘Main-lobe jamming suppression method of using spatial polarization characteristics of antennas’, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 2012, 48, (3), pp. 21672179.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Mao, C., Shi, L., Ren, B., et al: ‘The influence of polarization cancellation on radar SINR’. Progress in Electromagnetic Research Symp. (PIERS), IEEE, Shanghai, 2016, pp. 22412246.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Yang, X., Yin, P., Zeng, T., et al: ‘Applying auxiliary array to suppress mainlobe interference for ground-based radar’, IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett., 2013, 12, pp. 433436.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Yang, X., Zhang, Z., Zeng, T., et al: ‘Mainlobe interference suppression based on eigen-projection processing and covariance matrix reconstruction’, IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett., 2014, 13, pp. 13691372.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Qian, J., He, Z.: ‘Mainlobe interference suppression with eigenprojection algorithm and similarity constraints’, Electron. Lett., 2016, 52, (3), pp. 228230.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Zhou, F., Tao, M., Bai, X., et al: ‘Narrow-band interference suppression for SAR based on independent component analysis’, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 2013, 51, (10), pp. 49524960.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Tao, M., Zhou, F., Liu, Y., et al: ‘Tensorial independent component analysis-based feature extraction for polarimetric SAR data classification’, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 2015, 53, (5), PP. pp. 24812495.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Hyvärinen, A., Karhunen, J., Oja, E.: ‘Independent component analysis’ (John Wiley & Sons Press, New York, NY, 2004).
    16. 16)
      • 16. Jolliffe, I.: ‘Principal component analysis’ (John Wiley & Sons Press, Ltd, New York, NY, 2002).
    17. 17)
      • 17. Kambhatle, N., Leen, T.K.: ‘Dimension reduction by local principal computation analysis’, Neural Comput., 1997, 9, (7), pp. 14931516.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address