http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Sequential source localisation and range estimation based on shrinkage algorithm

Sequential source localisation and range estimation based on shrinkage algorithm

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Signal Processing — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

This study presents the shrinkage-based sequential source localisation and range estimation algorithms. The shrinkage factor is found using the variance of the estimate in the existing shrinkage algorithm. However, the variance of the estimate is difficult to calculate when the form of the estimate is complex. To circumvent this problem, the authors propose a shrinkage algorithm that employs the Cramér–Rao lower bound (CRLB) instead of the variance for the maximum likelihood (ML) estimate. The variance of the ML estimate and CRLB were found to be similar in simulation results. Furthermore, Stein's unbiased risk estimator and Ledoit–Wolf methods are used to determine the shrinkage factor. The resulting estimation accuracy of the proposed shrinkage-based sequential source localisation and range estimation methods was similar with that of the existing shrinkage algorithm.

References

    1. 1)
      • 1. Torrieri, D.J.: ‘Statistical theory of passive location systems’, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 1983, 20, (2), pp. 183198.
    2. 2)
      • 2. Rui, L., Ho, K.C.: ‘Bias analysis of maximum likelihood target location estimator’, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 2013, 50, (4), pp. 26792693.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Barton, R.J., Rao, D.: ‘Performance capabilities of long-range UWB-IR TDOA localization systems’, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process., 2008, Article ID: 236791.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Sun, M., Ho, K.C.: ‘Optimum sensor placement for fully and partially controllable sensor networks: a unified approach’, Signal Process., 2014, 102, pp. 5863.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Chalise, B.K., Zhang, Y., Amin, M.G., et al: ‘Target localization in a multi-static passive radar system through convex optimization’, Signal Process., 2008, 102, pp. 207215.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Qiao, T., Liu, H.: ‘Improved least median of squares localization for non-line-of-sight mitigation’, IEEE Commun. Lett., 2014, 18, (8), pp. 14511454.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Yin, F., Fritsche, C., Gustafsson, F., et al: ‘EM- and JMAP-ML based joint estimation algorithms for robust wireless geolocation in mixed LOS/NLOS environments’, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 2014, 62, (1), pp. 168182.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Chan, Y.T., Ho, K.C.: ‘A simple and efficient estimator for hyperbolic location’, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 1994, 42, (8), pp. 19051915.
    9. 9)
      • 9. So, H.C., Lin, L.: ‘Linear least squares approach for accurate received signal strength based source localization’, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 2011, 59, (8), pp. 40354040.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Sun, M., Yang, L., Ho, K.C.: ‘Accurate sequential self-localization of sensor nodes in closed-form’, Signal Process., 2012, 92, (12), pp. 29402951.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Park, C.-H., Chang, J.-H.: ‘Shrinkage estimation-based source localization with minimum mean squared error criterion and minimum bias criterion’, Digit. Signal Process., 2014, 29, pp. 100106.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Ben-Haim, Z., Eldar, Y.C.: ‘Blind minimax estimation’, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 2007, 53, (9), pp. 31453157.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Wasserman, L.: ‘All of nonparametric statistics’ (Springer, 2007, 1st edn.).
    14. 14)
      • 14. Ledoit, O., Wolf, M.: ‘A well-conditioned estimator for large dimensional covariance matrices’, J. Multivariate Anal., 2004, 88, (2), pp. 365411.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Casella, G., Berger, R.L.: ‘Statistical inference’ (Cengage Learning, 2001).
    16. 16)
      • 16. Mayer, L., Wilke, T.: ‘On biased estimation in linear models’, Technometrics, 1973, 15, (3), pp. 497508.
    17. 17)
      • 17. Eldar, Y.C.: ‘Uniformly improving the Cramér–Rao bound and maximum-likelihood estimation’, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 2006, 54, (8), pp. 29432956.
    18. 18)
      • 18. Park, C.-H., Hong, K.S., Nam, S.W., et al: ‘Biased SNR estimation using pilot and data symbols in BPSK and QPSK systems’, J. Commun. Netw., 2014, 16, (6), pp. 583591.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-spr.2016.0706
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-spr.2016.0706
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address