Modelling and forecasting of signal-to-interference plus noise ratio in femtocellular networks using logistic smooth threshold autoregressive model

Modelling and forecasting of signal-to-interference plus noise ratio in femtocellular networks using logistic smooth threshold autoregressive model

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Signal Processing — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

The aim of this paper is to present a non-linear statistical model to fit and forecast the signal-to-interference plus noise ratio (SINR) in two-tier heterogeneous cellular networks which consist of macrocells and femtocells. Since in these networks the number and locations of femtocell base stations (FBS) are variable, SINR forecasting can be useful in some areas such as power control and handover management. So far, linear autoregressive (AR) models have commonly been used in forecasting the received signal strength (rss) in macrocellular networks. However, AR modelling results in high mean square error (MSE) when data are non-linear. This paper focuses on SINR which takes into account signal strength, interference and noise effects. Moreover, macro-femto cellular network is considered. The F-test results show that the SINR data are non-linear, leading to use non-linear models instead of AR model. A non-linear logistic smooth threshold AR (LSTAR) model is utilised to model and forecast the SINR data. Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K-S) test demonstrates that LSTAR provides good fitness to the SINR samples. The results indicate that LSTAR model achieves much better performance in modelling and forecasting of SINR data than the AR model.


    1. 1)
    2. 2)
      • 2. Zahir, T., Arshad, K., Ko, Y., Moessner, K.: ‘A downlink power control scheme for interference avoidance in femtocells’. 2011 Seventh Int. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conf. (IWCMC), 2011, pp. 12221226.
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
      • 5. Franses, P.H., Van Dijk, D.: ‘Non-linear time series models in empirical finance’ (Cambridge University Press, New York, USA, 2000).
    6. 6)
      • 6. Box, G.E., Jenkins, G.M., Reinsel, G.C.: ‘Time series analysis: forecasting and control’ (John Wiley & Sons, USA, 2013).
    7. 7)
      • 7. Chatfield, C.: ‘Time-series forecasting’ (Chapman and Hall/CRC, USA, 2002).
    8. 8)
      • 8. Semmelrodt, S., Kattenbach, R.: ‘Investigation of different fading forecast schemes for flat fading radio channels’. 2003 IEEE 58th Vehicular Technology Conf., 2003. VTC 2003-Fall., 2003, pp. 149153.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Long, X., Sikdar, B.: ‘A wavelet based long range signal strength prediction in wireless networks’. 2008 IEEE Int. Conf. on Communications, ICC'08, 2008, pp. 20432047.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Eyceoz, T., Hu, S., Duel-Hallen, A.: ‘Performance analysis of long range prediction for fast fading channels’. Proc. of the 33rd CISS, 1999.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Tong, H.: ‘On a threshold model’ (Sijthoff & Noordhoff, 1978).
    12. 12)
      • 12. Tong, H., Lim, K.S.: ‘Threshold autoregression, limit cycles and cyclical data’, J. R. Stat. Soc.. Ser. B (Methodol.), 1980, 42, pp. 245292.
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
      • 16. Novlan, T., Andrews, J.G., Sohn, I., Ganti, R.K., Ghosh, A.: ‘Comparison of fractional frequency reuse approaches in the OFDMA cellular downlink’. 2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conf. (GLOBECOM 2010), 2010, pp. 15.
    17. 17)
      • 17. Lee, P., Lee, T., Jeong, J., Shin, J.: ‘Interference management in LTE femtocell systems using fractional frequency reuse’. 2010 12th Int. Conf. on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), 2010, pp. 10471051.
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
      • 21. Recommendation I.: ‘1225, ‘Guidelines for evaluation of radio transmission technologies for IMT-2000’’ (International Telecommunication Union, 1997).
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
      • 27. Stone, M., Brooks, R.J.: ‘Continuum regression: cross-validated sequentially constructed prediction embracing ordinary least squares, partial least squares and principal components regression’, J. R. Stat. Soc. B, (Methodol.), 1990, 52, pp. 237269.
    28. 28)
      • 28. Shi, Y., Eberhart, R.: ‘A modified particle swarm optimizer’. The 1998 IEEE Int. Conf. on Evolutionary Computation Proc., 1998. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence., 1998, pp. 6973.
    29. 29)
    30. 30)
      • 30. Choqueuse, V., Yao, K., Collin, L., Burel, G.: ‘Blind detection of the number of communication signals under spatially correlated noise by ICA and KS tests’. 2008 IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP 2008, 2008, pp. 23972400.
    31. 31)
      • 31. Wahlström, S.: ‘Comparing forecasts from LSTAR and linear autoregressive models’, 2004, available at http//
    32. 32)
      • 32. Granger, C.W., Terasvirta, T.: ‘Modelling non-linear economic relationships’ (OUP Catalogue, 1993).
    33. 33)

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address