Systematic approach in designing wavelet packet modulation-orthogonal frequency division multiplexing radar signal by applying the criterion of least-squares

Systematic approach in designing wavelet packet modulation-orthogonal frequency division multiplexing radar signal by applying the criterion of least-squares

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Signal Processing — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

In recent years, wavelet packet modulation-orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (WPM-OFDM) signals have been introduced for radar applications. These signals have some significant properties such as inherent high range resolution, high resistance of radar system against jamming reception and improved target detection performance in contrast with common traditional signals. However, there is no systematic method for designing WPM-OFDM signals to be used in radar applications. In the present study, the authors have started solving the problem of designing a WPM-OFDM radar signal under a criterion of minimising the least-squares error between designed and desired ambiguity functions. A thumbtack shape is assumed to be the ideal shape of the ambiguity function. In the following, an iterative algorithm is introduced to allocate a proper phase to the desired ambiguity function for obtaining better results. In this study, it is shown that this algorithm can reduce side-lobes, throughout the entire plane of the ambiguity function; therefore using the mentioned algorithm leads to having a desired signal for a radar application. Consequently, by extending the presented method, a pair of WPM-OFDM signals is simultaneously designed which obtain their cross ambiguity function to approximate a desired one under the criterion of least-squares.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Levanon, N., Mozeson, E.: ‘Radar signals’ (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2004).
    2. 2)
      • 2. De Maio, A., De Nicola, S., Huang, Y., Luo, Z.Q., Zhang, S.: ‘Design of phase codes for radar performance optimization with a similarity constraint’, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 2009, 57, (2), pp. 610621 (doi: 10.1109/TSP.2008.2008247).
    3. 3)
      • 3. Mohseni, R., Sheikhi, A., Shirazi, A.M.: ‘Multicarrier constant envelope OFDM signal design for radar applications’, AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun., 2010, 64, (11), pp. 9991008 (doi: 10.1016/j.aeue.2009.10.008).
    4. 4)
      • 4. Kafshgari, S., Mohseni, R.: ‘The effect of target fluctuation on the OFDM radar detection performance’. 20th Telecommunications Forum (TELFOR), Belgrade, Serbia, November 2012, pp. 827830.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Sen, S., Nehorai, A.: ‘Target detection in clutter using adaptive OFDM radar’, IEEE Signal Process. Lett., 2009, 16, (7), pp. 592595 (doi: 10.1109/LSP.2009.2020470).
    6. 6)
      • 6. Sturm, C., Zwick, T., Wiesbeck, W.: ‘An OFDM system concept for joint radar and communications operations’. Vehicular Technology Conf., Barcelona, Spain, April 2009, pp. 15.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Sit, Y.L., Reichardt, L., Sturm, C., Zwick, T.: ‘Extension of the OFDM joint radar-communication system for a multipath, multiuser scenario’. IEEE Radar Conf., Kansas City, MO, May 2011, pp. 718723.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Garmatyuk, D., Schuerger, J., Morton, Y.T., Binns, K., Durbin, M., Kimani, J.: ‘Feasibility study of a multi-carrier dual-use imaging radar and communication system’. Radar Conf. EuRAD, Munich, Germany, October 2007, pp. 194197.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Sebt, M.A., Sheikhi, A., Nayebi, M.M.: ‘Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing radar signal design with optimised ambiguity function and low peak-to-average power ratio’, IET Radar Sonar Navig., 2009, 3, (2), pp. 122132 (doi: 10.1049/iet-rsn:20080106).
    10. 10)
      • 10. Sen, S., Nehorai, A.: ‘Adaptive design of OFDM radar signal with improved wideband ambiguity function’, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 2010, 58, (2), pp. 928933 (doi: 10.1109/TSP.2009.2032456).
    11. 11)
      • 11. Sen, S., Tang, G., Nehorai, A.: ‘Multi-objective optimization-based OFDM radar waveform design for target detection’, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 2011, 59, (2), pp. 639652 (doi: 10.1109/TSP.2010.2089628).
    12. 12)
      • 12. Sen, S., Nehorai, A.: ‘OFDM radar waveform design for sparsity-based multi-target tracking’. Waveform Diversity and Design Conf. (WDD), Niagara Falls, ON, August 2010, pp. 1822.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Linfoot, S.L., Ibrahim, M.K., Al-Akaidi, M.M.: ‘Orthogonal wavelet division multiplex: an alternative to OFDM’, IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron., 2007, 53, (2), pp. 278284 (doi: 10.1109/TCE.2007.381686).
    14. 14)
      • 14. Lakshmanan, M.K., Nikookar, H.: ‘A review of wavelets for digital wireless communication’, J. Wirel. Pers. Commun., 2006, 37, (3–4), pp. 387420 (doi: 10.1007/s11277-006-9077-y).
    15. 15)
      • 15. Mohseni, R., Sheikhi, A., Shirazi, A.M.: ‘Wavelet packet based OFDM radar signals’. Int. Conf. Radar, Adelaide, SA, September 2008, pp. 552557.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Mozeson, E., Levanon, N.: ‘Multicarrier radar signals with low peak-to-mean envelope power ratio’. IEE Proc. Radar Sonar Navig., 2003, 150, (2), pp. 7177 (doi: 10.1049/ip-rsn:20030263).
    17. 17)
      • 17. Sussman, S.M.: ‘Least square synthesis of RADAR Ambiguity function’, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory, 1962, 8, (3), pp. 246254 (doi: 10.1109/TIT.1962.1057703).
    18. 18)
      • 18. Vaidyanathan, P.P.: ‘Multirate systems and filter banks’ (Prentice Hall, Englewood Clis, NJ, 1992).
    19. 19)
      • 19. Wang, W.G.: ‘OFDM waveform diversity design for MIMO SAR imaging’. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symp. (IGARSS), Niagara Falls, ON, July 2012, pp. 20902093.
    20. 20)
      • 20. Sen, S., Nehorai, A.: ‘OFDM MIMO radar with mutual-information waveform design for low-grazing angle tracking’, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 2010, 58, (6), pp. 31523162 (doi: 10.1109/TSP.2010.2044834).
    21. 21)
      • 21. Vrhel, M., Lee, C., Unser, M.: ‘Fast continuous wavelet transform’. Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Detroit, MI, May 1995, pp. 11651168.
    22. 22)
      • 22. Shensa, M.: ‘The discrete wavelet transform: wedding the a Trous and Mallat algorithms’, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 1992, 40, (10), pp. 24642482 (doi: 10.1109/78.157290).
    23. 23)
      • 23. He, H., Stoica, P., Li, J.: ‘On synthesizing cross ambiguity functions’. Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Prague, May 2011, pp. 35363539.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address