Multiple-view time–frequency distribution based on the empirical mode decomposition

Multiple-view time–frequency distribution based on the empirical mode decomposition

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Signal Processing — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

This study proposes a novel, composite time–frequency distribution (TFD) constructed using a multiple-view approach. This composite TFD utilises the intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) of the empirical mode decomposition (EMD) to generate each view that are then combined using the arithmetic mean. This process has the potential to eliminate the inter-component interference generated by a quadratic TFD (QTFD), as the IMFs of the EMD are, in general, monocomponent signals. The formulation of the multiple-view TFD in the ambiguity domain results in faster computation, compared to a convolutive implementation in the time–frequency domain, and a more robust TFD in the presence of noise. The composite TFD, referred to as the EMD-TFD, was shown to generate a heuristically more accurate representation of the distribution of time–frequency energy in a signal. It was also shown to have performance comparable to the Wigner–Ville distribution when estimating the instantaneous frequency of multiple signal components in the presence of noise.


    1. 1)
      • G.C. Gaunaurd , H.C. Strifors . Signal analysis by means of time–frequency (Wigner-type) distributions – applications to sonar and radar echoes. Proc. IEEE , 9 , 1231 - 1248
    2. 2)
      • B. Boashash . (2003) Time frequency signal analysis and processing: a comprehensive reference.
    3. 3)
      • B. Boashash , P. O'Shea . A methodology for detection and classification of some underwater acoustic signals using time–frequency analysis techniques. IEEE Trans. Acoustics, Speech Signal Process. , 11 , 1829 - 1841
    4. 4)
      • Stevenson, N., Mesbah, M., Boashash, B.: `A time–frequency distribution based on the empirical mode decomposition', Proc. Int. Symp. on Signal Processing Applications, February 2007, Sharjah, UAE, p. 485–488.
    5. 5)
      • B. Boashash , S. Haykin . (1991) Time–frequency signal analysis,.
    6. 6)
      • E. Bedrosian . A product theorem for Hilbert transforms. Proc. IEEE , 686 - 689
    7. 7)
      • S. Mallat . (1998) A wavelet tour of signal processing.
    8. 8)
      • S. Mallat , Z. Zhang . Matching pursuits with time–frequency dictionaries. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , 12 , 3397 - 3415
    9. 9)
      • N.E. Huang , Z. Shen , S.R. Long . The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proc. R. Soc. A , 903 - 995
    10. 10)
      • H.I. Choi , W.J. Williams . Improved time–frequency representation of multicomponent signals using exponential kernels. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. , 6 , 862 - 871
    11. 11)
      • D.L. Jones , R.G. Baraniuk . A simple scheme for adapting time–frequency representations. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , 12 , 3530 - 3535
    12. 12)
      • Frazer, G., Boashash, B.: `Multiple view time–frequency distributions', Proc. Asilomar Conf. on Signals, Systems and Computers, November 1993, Pacific Grove, USA, p. 513–517.
    13. 13)
      • Frazer, G.J.: `Aspects of time-varying non-Gaussian non-linear signal analysis', 1996, PhD, Queensland University of Technology.
    14. 14)
      • Stevenson, N., Mesbah, M., Boashash, B., Whitehouse, H.J.: `A joint time–frequency empirical mode decomposition for non-stationary signal separation', Proc. Int. Symp. on Signal Processing Applications, February 2007, Sharjah, UAE, p. 282–285.
    15. 15)
      • G. Rilling , P. Flandrin , P. Goncalves . Empirical mode decomposition as a filter bank. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. , 2 , 112 - 114
    16. 16)
      • N.E. Huang , Z. Shen , S.R. Long . A new view of nonlinear water waves: the Hilbert spectrum. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. , 417 - 457
    17. 17)
      • Rankine, L., Stevenson, N., Mesbah, M., Boashash, B.: `A quantitative comparison of non-parametric time–frequency representations', Proc. European Conf. on Signal Processing, September 2005, CD-ROM, Antalya, Turkey.
    18. 18)
      • L. Rankine , M. Mesbah , B. Boashash . IF estimation for multicomponent signals using image processing techniques in the time–frequency domain. Signal Process. , 6 , 1234 - 1250

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address