access icon free Effect of off-axis H-coil sensitivity on clockwise–anticlockwise differences of rotational power loss in isotropic samples

Wire wound H-coils used for rotational measurements are not completely immune to off-axis components of magnetic field strength H. As a result, such components are capable of introducing the significant difference between the rotational power loss measured in the clockwise (CW) or anticlockwise (ACW) direction of rotation. These measurement errors do not influence the average value, and they are distinctly different from the errors caused by the angular misalignment of the sensors in the field metric method. As demonstrated in this study even ideal angular positioning of the H-coils could still produce CW–ACW differences at the level of ±15% at lower flux density and ±30% close to saturation.

Inspec keywords: magnetic field measurement; coils; measurement errors

Other keywords: off-axis H-coil sensitivity; angular misalignment; flux density; field metric method; measurement errors; clockwise–anticlockwise differences; isotropic samples; rotational power loss

Subjects: Inductors and transformers; Magnetic variables measurement

References

    1. 1)
      • 5. Nakata, T., Kawase, Y., Nakano, M.: ‘Improvement of measuring accuracy of magnetic field strength in single sheet testers by using two H coils’, IEEE Trans. Magn., 1987, 23, (5), p. 2596.
    2. 2)
      • 17. ANSYS, http://www.ansys.com, accessed 13 December 2017.
    3. 3)
      • 18. Somkun, S.: ‘Magnetostriction and magnetic anisotropy in non-oriented electrical steels and stator core laminations’, PhD thesis, Wolfson Centre for Magnetics, Cardiff University, UK, 2010.
    4. 4)
      • 14. Zurek, S., Meydan, T.: ‘Errors in the power loss measured in clockwise and anticlockwise rotational magnetisation. Part 2: physical phenomena’, IEE Proc., Sci. Meas. Technol., 2006, 153, (4), p. 152.
    5. 5)
      • 12. Sievert, J.: ‘Recent advances in the one- and two-dimensional magnetic measurements technique for electrical sheet steel’, IEEE Trans. Magn., 1990, 26, (5), p. 2553.
    6. 6)
      • 2. Sievert, J., Ahlers, H., Birkfeld, M., et al: ‘European intercomparison of measurements of rotational power loss in electrical sheet steel’, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 1996, 160, p. 115.
    7. 7)
      • 1. Sievert, J., Ahlers, H., Birkfeld, M., et al: ‘Intercomparison of measurements of magnetic losses in electrical sheet steel under rotation flux conditions’, Commission of the European Communities, Report EUR 16255 EN, EC Brussels, Luxembourg, 1995.
    8. 8)
      • 15. Zurek, S.: ‘3D FEM study of field uniformity in circular laminations with additional shielding for rotational loss measurements’, Electrical Review (Przeglad Elektrotechniczny), R. 91, NR 12/2015, 2015, p. 43.
    9. 9)
      • 19. Zurek, S.: ‘Characterisation of soft magnetic materials under rotational magnetisation’ (CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, Florida, 2018), ISBN 978-1-138-30436-9.
    10. 10)
      • 6. Stupakov, O., Wood, R., Melikhov, Y., et al: ‘Measurement of electrical steels with direct field determination’, IEEE Trans. Magn., 2010, 46, (2), p. 298.
    11. 11)
      • 21. Zurek, S.: ‘Theoretical concept and FEM simulations of improved shielding for round horizontal yokes for rotational power loss measurement’, J. Elect. Eng., 2017, 68, (4), p. 267.
    12. 12)
      • 22. Zurek, S.: ‘Novel H-coil design with improved immunity to off-axis H components’, IEEE Sens. J., 2017, to appear.
    13. 13)
      • 7. Xu, J.: ‘Recent experiments on rotational power loss measurement at PTB’. Proc. 4th 2DM Workshop, Cardiff, 1995, p. 9.
    14. 14)
      • 3. Johnk, C.T.A.: ‘Engineering electromagnetic fields & waves’ (Willey International Edition, New York, USA, 1975), ISBN 9780471442905.
    15. 15)
      • 10. Makaveev, D., De Wulf, M., Gyselinck, J., et al: ‘Measurement system for 2D magnetic properties of electrical steel sheets: design and performance’. Proc. 6th 1&2DM Workshop, Bad Gastein, Austria, 2000, p. 48.
    16. 16)
      • 11. Zurek, S.: ‘Two-dimensional magnetisation problems in electrical steels’, PhD thesis, Wolfson Centre for Magnetics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK, 2005, https://orca.cf.ac.uk/55978/1/U584713.pdf (accessed on 10 January 2018).
    17. 17)
      • 4. Singh, Y.: ‘Electromagnetic field theory’ (Pearson Education India, Delhi, India, 2011).
    18. 18)
      • 9. Tumanski, S.: ‘Investigations of 2D parameters of electrical steels’. Proc. 6th 1&2DM Workshop, Bad Gastein, 2000(b), p. 185.
    19. 19)
      • 16. Zurek, S.: ‘Sensitivity to off-axis vector components of typical wire wound flat H-coil configurations’, IEEE Sens. J., 2017, 17, (13), p. 4021.
    20. 20)
      • 20. Zurek, S., Meydan, T.: ‘Differences in clockwise and anticlockwise rotational power losses measured under controlled flux density and magnetic field in electrical steels’, Electrical Review (Przeglad Elektrotechniczny), R. 82, NR 6/2006, 2006, p. 11.
    21. 21)
      • 13. Zurek, S., Meydan, T.: ‘Errors in the power loss measured in clockwise and anticlockwise rotational magnetisation. Part 1: mathematical study’, IEE Proc., Sci. Meas. Technol., 2006, 153, (4), p. 147.
    22. 22)
      • 8. Zhu, J.G., Ramsden, V.S.: ‘Measurement and modelling of losses under two dimensional excitation in rotating electrical machines’. Proc. 5th Int. Workshop on Two-Dimensional Magnetization problems, Grenoble, France, 1997(b), p. 63.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-smt.2017.0385
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-smt.2017.0385
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading