access icon free Altitude data fusion utilising differential measurement and complementary filter

© The Institution of Engineering and Technology
Received 25/03/2016, Accepted 18/07/2016, Revised 22/06/2016, Published 01/11/2016

In plenty of researches and real systems, barometer and accelerometer which can provide altitude and acceleration measurements, respectively, are utilised in altitude estimation of small unmanned aerial vehicle. These sensors can draw on their merits and improve the accuracy of altitude estimation. The altitude measurement of barometer has the drift problem as one of its disadvantages which could deteriorate the performance of altitude estimation. In addition, barometer and accelerometer both have stochastic error which reduce the accuracy of altitude estimation. A novel scenario is proposed by utilising differential altitude measurement and complementary filter to deal with above issues. It is accurate and suitable for real-time application. In this scenario, altitude drift is reduced by using differential altitude measurement, and the stochastic error of altitude is minimised by using complementary filter algorithm. Stair and flight experiments are implemented to test this scenario. The experimental results indicate that it can provide good dynamic performance and flexibility for altitude estimation.

Inspec keywords: barometers; sensors; accelerometers; sensor fusion; measurement errors; acceleration measurement; stochastic processes; height measurement; filters

Other keywords: accelerometer; acceleration measurement; complementary filter algorithm; barometer; differential altitude measurement; altitude data fusion estimation; stochastic error; unmanned aerial vehicle; sensor

Subjects: Spatial variables measurement; Sensing and detecting devices; Other topics in statistics; Velocity, acceleration and rotation measurement; Probability theory, stochastic processes, and statistics; Spatial variables measurement; Velocity, acceleration and rotation measurement; Sensing devices and transducers; Pressure and vacuum measurement

References

    1. 1)
      • 1. Szafranski, G., Czyba, R., Janusz, W., et al: ‘Altitude estimation for the UAV¡̄s applications based on sensors fusion algorithm’. 2013 Int. Conf. on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), Atlanta, GA, 2013, pp. 508–515.
    2. 2)
      • 12. Gui, P., Tang, L., Mukhopadhyay, S.: ‘MEMS based IMU for tilting measure- ment: Comparison of complementary and kalman filter based data fusion’. 2015 IEEE 10th Conf. on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), Auckland, 2015, pp. 2004–2009.
    3. 3)
      • 9. Eynard, D., Vasseur, P., Demonceaux, C., et al: ‘UAV altitude estimation by mixed stereoscopic vision’. 2010 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Taipei, 2010, pp. 646–651.
    4. 4)
      • 13. Tseng, S.P., Li, W.L., Sheng, C.Y., et al: ‘Motion and attitude estimation using inertial measurements with complementary filter’. 2011 Eight Control Conf. (ASCC), Asian, Kaohsiung, 2011, pp. 863–868.
    5. 5)
      • 10. Cherian, A., Andersh, J., Morellas, V., et al: ‘Autonomous al- titude estimation of a UAV using a single onboard camera’. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2009. IROS 2009.St. Louis, MO, 2009, pp. 3900–3905.
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
      • 6. Kim, Y.-K., Choi, S.-H., Kim, H.-W., et al: ‘Performance improve- ment and altitude estimation of pedestrian dead-reckoning system using a low-cost MEMS sensor’. 2012 12th Int. Conf. on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS), 17–21 October 2012, vol., no., pp. 1655–1660.
    8. 8)
      • 7. Yanjun, L., Yang, L., Shenglin, Y.: ‘Research on the algorithm of information fusion for altitude of UAV’. 2013 Fourth Int. Conf. on Intelligent Systems Design and Engineering Applications, 6–7 November 2013, vol., no., pp. 523–526.
    9. 9)
      • 11. Karunarathne, M.S., Ekanayake, S.W., Pathirana, P.N.: ‘An adaptive complementary filter for inertial sensor based data fusion to track upper body motion’. 2014 Seventh Int. Conf. on Information and Automation for Sustainability (ICIAfS), Colombo, 2014, pp. 1–5.
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
      • 15. Savage, P.G.: ‘Strapdown analytics’ (Strapdown Associates, Inc., Maple Plain, Minnesota, 2000).
    12. 12)
      • 16. Parviainen, J., Kantola, J., Collin, J.: ‘Differential barometry in personal navigation’. 2008 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symp., 5–8 May 2008, vol., no., pp. 148–152.
    13. 13)
      • 2. Yong, H., Ziyang, Z., Zhisheng, W.: ‘Federated filter based multi-sensor fault-tolerant altitude determination system for UAV’. 2008 Chinese Control and Decision Conf., Yantai, Shandong, 2008, pp. 2030–2034.
    14. 14)
      • 5. Gasior, P., Gardecki, S., Gosliski, J., et al: ‘Estimation of altitude and vertical velocity for multirotor aerial vehicle using Kalman Filter’, Recent Adv. Autom. Robot. Meas. Tech. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput., 2014, 267, pp. 377–385.
    15. 15)
      • 14. Li, X., He, C., Wang, Y., et al: ‘Generalized complementary filter for at- titude estimation based on vector observations and cross products’. 2015 IEEE Int. Conf. on Information and Automation, Lijiang, 2015, pp. 1733–1737.
    16. 16)
      • 8. Bevermeier, M., Walter, O., Peschke, S., et al: ‘Barometric altitude estimation combined with map-matching in a loosely-coupled Kalman-filter’. 2010 Seventh Workshop on Positioning Navigation and Communication (WPNC), 11–12 March 2010, vol., no., pp. 128–134.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-smt.2016.0118
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-smt.2016.0118
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading