Improving pulse eddy current and ultrasonic testing stress measurement accuracy using neural network data fusion

Improving pulse eddy current and ultrasonic testing stress measurement accuracy using neural network data fusion

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Science, Measurement & Technology — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Stress and residual stress are two crucial factors which play important roles in mechanical performance of materials, including fatigue and creep, hence measuring them is highly in demand. Pulse eddy current (PEC) and ultrasonic testing (UT) are two non-destructive tests (NDT) which are nominated to measure stresses and residual stresses by numerous scholars. However, both techniques suffer from lack of accuracy and reliability. One technique to tackle these challenges is data fusion, which has numerous approaches. This study introduces a promising one called neural network data fusion, which shows effective performance. First, stresses are simulated in an aluminium alloy 2024 specimen and then PEC and UT signals related to stresses are acquired and processed. Afterward, useful information obtained is fused using artificial neural network procedure and stresses are estimated by fused data. Finally, the accuracy of fused data are compared with PEC and UT information and results show the capability of neural network data fusion to improve stress measurement accuracy.


    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
      • 6. Hauk, V.: ‘Structural and residual stress analysis by nondestructive methods’ (Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1997).
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
      • 16. Javadi, Y.: ‘Ultrasonic measurement of hoop residual stress in stainless steel pipes’, Manuf. Ind. Eng., 2013, 12, (1–2), pp. 16.
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
      • 20. Javadi, Y., Hloch, S.: ‘Employing the waves to measure longitudinal residual stresses in different depths of a stainless steel welded plate’, Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2013.
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
      • 24. Lawrence, A.K.: ‘Sensor and data fusion: a tool for information assessment and decision making’. SPIE, Lake Buena Vista, USA, 2004.
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
      • 27. Gautier, S.: ‘X-ray and ultrasound data fusion’, Image Process., 1998, 3, pp. 366369.
    28. 28)
    29. 29)
    30. 30)
    31. 31)
      • 32. Hedman, H.: ‘Performance evaluation of artificial neural networks in the foreign exchange market’, Department of Mathematics, Royal Institute of Technology, Master's Thesis (TMTHM), Spring2012.
    32. 32)
      • 33. Haykin, S.: ‘Neural networks’ (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1998).
    33. 33)
    34. 34)

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address