References

• 1. 1)
     • 5. Aaen, I., Arent, J., Mathiassen, L., et al: ‘A conceptual map of software process improvement’, Scand. J. Inf. Syst., 2001, 13, (1), pp. 123–146.
  2. 2)
     • 16. Samalikova, J., Kusters, R.J., Trienekens, J.J., et al: ‘Process mining support for capability maturity model integration-based software process assessment, in principle and in practice’, J. Softw. Evol. Process, 2014, 26, (7), pp. 714–728.
  3. 3)
     • 32. Boehm, B., Turner, R.: ‘Management challenges to implementing agile processes in traditional development organizations’, IEEE Softw., 2005, 22, (5), pp. 30–39.
  4. 4)
     • 12. Chrissis, M.B., Konrad, M., Shrum, S.: ‘CMMI: guidelines for process integration and product improvement’, 2003.
  5. 5)
     • 30. Ramesh, B., Mohan, K., Cao, L.: ‘Ambidexterity in agile distributed development: an empirical investigation’, Inf. Syst. Res., 2012, 23, (2), pp. 323–339.
  6. 6)
     • 8. O'Reilly, C.A., Tushman, M.L.: ‘Organizational ambidexterity in action: how managers explore and exploit’, Calif. Manage. Rev., 2011, 53, (4), pp. 5–22.
  7. 7)
     • 33. Vinekar, V., Slinkman, C.W., Nerur, S.: ‘Can agile and traditional systems development approaches coexist? An ambidextrous view’, Inf. Syst. Manag., 2006, 23, (3), pp. 31–42.
  8. 8)
     • 23. Pawar, R.P.: ‘A comparative study of agile software development methodology and traditional waterfall model’, IOSR J. Comput. Eng., 2015, 2, (2), pp. 1–8.
  9. 9)
     • 31. Subramanyam, R., Ramasubbu, N., Krishnan, M.S.: ‘In search of efficient flexibility: effects of software component granularity on development effort, defects, and customization effort’, Inf. Syst. Res., 2012, 23, (3), pp. 787–803.
  10. 10)
      • 29. Harris, M.L., Collins, R.W., Hevner, A.R.: ‘Control of flexible software development under uncertainty’, Inf. Syst. Res., 2009, 20, (3), pp. 400–419.
  11. 11)
      • 3. Sabale, R.G., Dani, A.: ‘Comparative study of prototype model for software engineering with system development life cycle’, IOSR J. Eng., 2012, 2, (7), pp. 2250–3021.
  12. 12)
      • 7. Adler, P.: ‘The collaborative, ambidextrous enterprise’, Universia Bus. Rev., 2013, 40, pp. 34–51.
  13. 13)
      • 9. Heckscher, C., Adler, P.: ‘The Firm as Collaborative Community: Reconstructing Trust in the Knowledge Economy’, (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2007, 1st Edn.).
  14. 14)
      • 26. Stoica, M., Mircea, M., Ghilic-Micu, B.: ‘Software development: agile vs. Traditional’, Inform. Econ., 2013, 17, (4), pp. 64–76.
  15. 15)
      • 20. Cho, J.: ‘A hybrid software development method for large-scale projects: rational unified process with scrum’, Issues Inf. Syst., 2009, 10, (2), pp. 340–348.
  16. 16)
      • 25. Preeti, R., Saru, D.: ‘Impact of different methodologies in software development process’, Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol., 2014, 5, (2), pp. 1112–1116.
  17. 17)
      • 2. Mathai, M.K., Venugopal, R., Abraham, J.T.: ‘Hybrid model for software development’, Int. J. Res. Eng. Technol., 2016, 5, (1), pp. 198–202.
  18. 18)
      • 15. Garzás, J., Paulk, M.C.: ‘A case study of software process improvement with CMMI-DEV and Scrum in Spanish companies’, J. Softw. Evol. Process, 2013, 25, (12), pp. 1325–1333.
  19. 19)
      • 11. Glazer, H., Dalton, J., Anderson, D., et al: ‘CMMI or agile: why not embrace both!’. CMU/SEI-2008-TN-003, Softw. Eng. Inst., November 2008, p. 48.
  20. 20)
      • 24. Munassar, N.M.A., Govardhan, A.: ‘A comparison between five models of software engineering’, Int. J. Comput. Sci., 2010, 7, (5), pp. 94–101.
  21. 21)
      • 19. Hneif, M., Ow, S.H.: ‘Review of agile methodologies in software development 1’, Int. J. Res. Rev. Appl. Sci., 2009, 1, (1), pp. 2076–2734.
  22. 22)
      • 10. Agrawal, M., Chari, K.: ‘Software effort, quality, and cycle time: a study of CMM level 5 projects’, IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 2007, 33, (3), pp. 145–156.
  23. 23)
      • 13. Kuhrmann, M.: ‘Crafting a software process improvement approach – a retrospective systematization’, J. Softw. Evol. Process, 2015, 27, pp. 114–145.
  24. 24)
      • 17. Paulk, M.C.: ‘Extreme programming from a CMM perspective’, IEEE Softw., 2001, 18, (6), pp. 19–26.
  25. 25)
      • 4. Ramasubbu, N., Balan, R.K.: ‘The impact of process choice in high maturity environments: an empirical analysis’. Proc. – Int. Conf. on Software Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, May 2009, pp. 529–539.
  26. 26)
      • 21. Stephen, O., Oriaku, K.: ‘Software development methodologies: agile model vs V-model’, Int. J. Eng. Tech. Res., 2014, 2, (11), pp. 108–113.
  27. 27)
      • 14. Niazi, M.: ‘A comparative study of software process improvement implementation success factors’, J. Softw. Evol. Process, 2015, 27, (9), pp. 700–722.
  28. 28)
      • 6. Lindvall, M., Rus, I. ‘Process diversity in software development’, IEEE Softw., 2000, 17, (4), pp. 14–18.
  29. 29)
      • 34. Batra, D., Xia, W., Van der Meer, D.E., et al: ‘Balancing agile and structured development approaches to successfully manage large distributed software projects: A case study from the cruise line industry’, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 2010, 27, (1), pp. 379–394.
  30. 30)
      • 1. Curtis, B.: ‘Global pursuit of process maturity’, IEEE Softw., 2000, 17, (4), pp. 76–78.
  31. 31)
      • 28. Ramasubbu, N., Bharadwaj, A., Kumar Tayi, G.: ‘Software process diversity: conceptualization, measurement, and analysis of impact on project performance’, MIS Q., 2015, 39, (4), pp. 787–807.
  32. 32)
      • 18. Sutherland, J., Jakobsen, C.R., Johnson, K.: ‘Scrum and CMMI level 5: the magic potion for code warriors’. Proc. – AGILE 2007, Washington, D.C., USA, August 2007, pp. 272–277.
  33. 33)
      • 22. Balaji, S.: ‘Waterfall vs v-model vs agile: a comparative study on SDLC’, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Bus. Manage., 2012, 2, (1), pp. 26–30.
  34. 34)
      • 27. Madachy, R., Boehm, B., Lane, J.A.: ‘Spiral lifecycle increment modeling for new hybrid processes’. SPW: Int. Software Process Workshop, Shanghai, China, May 2006, pp. 167–177.