Your browser does not support JavaScript!

COEUS 2.0: automated platform to integrate and publish biomedical data as nanopublications

COEUS 2.0: automated platform to integrate and publish biomedical data as nanopublications

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Software — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Publishing, analysing or properly accessing the abundant information resulting largely from experimental studies in the biomedical domain are current challenges for the research community. Problems with the extraction of relevant information, redundant data, and lack of associations or provenance are good examples of the main concerns. The innovative nanopublication publishing strategy tries to overcome these issues by representing the essential pieces of publishable information on the Semantic Web. However, existing methods to create these Resource Description Framework-based data snippets are based on complex scripting procedures, hindering their use by the community. Therefore, novel and automated strategies are needed to explore the evident value of nanopublications and to enable data attribution mechanisms, an important feature for data owners. To solve these challenges, the authors introduce the second generation of the COEUS open-source application framework (, an automated platform to integrate heterogeneous scientific outcomes into nanopublications. This results in seamless integration, making data accessible and citable at the same time. No additional scripting methods are needed. A validation of a nanopublishing pipeline is described to demonstrate the system functionalities, integrating and publishing common biomedical achievements into the Semantic Web ecosystem.


    1. 1)
      • 14. Sernadela, P., Lopes, P., Oliveira, J.L.: ‘A knowledge federation architecture for rare disease patient registries and biobanks’, J. Inf. Syst. Eng. Manag., 2016, 1, (1), pp. 8390.
    2. 2)
      • 7. Belhajjame, K., Corcho, O., Garijo, D.: ‘Workflow-centric research objects: first class citizens in scholarly discourse’. Proc. ESWC2012 Workshop on the Future of Scholarly Communication in the Semantic Web, 2012.
    3. 3)
      • 21. Chichester, C., Karch, O., Gaudet, P., et al: ‘Converting neXtProt into linked data and nanopublications’, Semant. Web, 2015, 6, (2), pp. 147153.
    4. 4)
      • 9. McCusker, J., Lebo, T.: ‘Next generation cancer data discovery, access, and integration using prizms and nanopublications’. Data Integration in the Life Sciences, 2013, pp. 105112.
    5. 5)
      • 25. Kuhn, T., Barbano, P.: ‘Broadening the scope of nanopublications’. Semant. Web Semant. Big Data, 2013, 7882, pp. 487501.
    6. 6)
      • 28. Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T.: ‘Linked data-the story so far’, Int. J. Semant. Web Inf. Syst., 2009, 5, pp. 122.
    7. 7)
      • 29. Mitchell, J. A., Aronson, A. R., Mork, J. G., et al: ‘Gene indexing: characterization and analysis of NLM's GeneRIFs’. AMIA Annual Symp. Proc., January 2003, pp. 460464.
    8. 8)
      • 20. Queralt-Rosinach, N., Kuhn, T., Chichester, C., et al: ‘Publishing DisGeNET as nanopublications’, Semant. Web, 2016, 7, (5), pp. 519528.
    9. 9)
      • 4. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: ‘The semantic web’, Sci. Am., 2001, 284, (5), pp. 2837.
    10. 10)
      • 6. Mons, B., Velterop, J.: ‘Nano-publication in the e-science era’. Work. Semant. Web Appl. Sci. Discourse, 2009.
    11. 11)
      • 2. Patrinos, G.P., Cooper, D.N., van Mulligen, E., et al: ‘Microattribution and nanopublication as means to incentivize the placement of human genome variation data into the public domain’, Hum. Mutat., 2012, 33, (11), pp. 15031512.
    12. 12)
      • 27. Keivanloo, I., Rilling, J.: ‘Software trustworthiness 2.0 – a semantic web enabled global source code analysis approach’, J. Syst. Softw., 2014, 89, pp. 3350.
    13. 13)
      • 5. Groth, P., Gibson, A., Velterop, J.: ‘The anatomy of a nanopublication’. Information Services and Use, 2010.
    14. 14)
      • 8. Belhajjame, K., Zhao, J., Garijo, D., et al: ‘The research object suite of ontologies: sharing and exchanging research data and methods on the open Web’ (arXiv Prepr. arXiv 1401.4307, 2014), p. 20.
    15. 15)
      • 30. Lu, Z., Cohen, K.B., Hunter, L.: ‘Finding GeneRIFs via gene ontology annotations’. Pacific Symp. on Biocomputing, January 2006, pp. 5263.
    16. 16)
      • 19. Harland, L.: ‘Open PHACTS: a semantic knowledge infrastructure for public and commercial drug discovery research’. Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, 2012.
    17. 17)
      • 16. Silva, L. A. B., Costa, C., Oliveira, J. L.: ‘Semantic search over DICOM repositories’. 2014 IEEE Int. Conf. Healthcare Informatics, 2014, pp. 238246.
    18. 18)
      • 23. Fokkema, I.F.A.C., Taschner, P.E.M., Schaafsma, G.C.P., et al: ‘LOVD v.2.0: the next generation in gene variant databases’, Hum. Mutat., 2011, 32, (5), pp. 557563.
    19. 19)
      • 18. Giardine, B., Borg, J., Higgs, D.R., et al: ‘Systematic documentation and analysis of human genetic variation in hemoglobinopathies using the microattribution approach’, Nat. Genet., 2011, 43, (4), pp. 295301.
    20. 20)
      • 17. Sernadela, P., Lopes, P., Campos, D., et al: ‘A semantic layer for unifying and exploring biomedical document curation results’. Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, 2015, pp. 817.
    21. 21)
      • 11. Lopes, P., Oliveira, J. L.: ‘COEUS: ‘semantic web in a box’ for biomedical applications’, J. Biomed. Semantics, 2012, 3, (1), p. 11.
    22. 22)
      • 24. Kuhn, T., Krauthammer, M.: ‘Underspecified scientific claims in nanopublications’ (arXiv Prepr. arXiv1209.1483, 2012).
    23. 23)
      • 12. Lopes, P., Oliveira, J.L.: ‘An innovative portal for rare genetic diseases research: the semantic diseasecard’, J. Biomed. Inf., 2013, 46, pp. 11081115.
    24. 24)
      • 31. Lu, Z., Cohen, K. B., Hunter, L.: ‘GeneRIF quality assurance as summary revisionat’. Pacific Symp. on Biocomputing, January 2007, pp. 269280.
    25. 25)
      • 10. Sernadela, P., Van der Horst, E., Thompson, M., et al: ‘A nanopublishing architecture for biomedical data’. 8th Int. Conf. Practical Applications of Computational Biology & Bioinformatics (PACBB 2014), 2014, vol. 294, pp. 277284.
    26. 26)
      • 3. Velterop, J.: ‘Nanopublications*: the future of coping with information overload’ (LOGOS J. World B. Community, 2010).
    27. 27)
      • 15. Monteiro, E., Sernadela, P., Matos, S., et al: ‘Semantic knowledge base construction from radiology reports’. Proc. of the 9th Int. Joint Conf. Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies, 2016, pp. 345352.
    28. 28)
      • 1. Anderson, N.R., Lee, E.S., Brockenbrough, J.S., et al: ‘Issues in biomedical research data management and analysis: needs and barriers’, J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc., 2007, 14, (4), pp. 478488.
    29. 29)
      • 13. Thompson, R., Johnston, L., Taruscio, D., et al: ‘RD-Connect: an integrated platform connecting databases, registries, biobanks and clinical bioinformatics for rare disease research’, J. Gen. Intern. Med., 2014, 29, pp. 780787.
    30. 30)
      • 26. Ruttenberg, A., Clark, T., Bug, W., et al: ‘Advancing translational research with the semantic web’, BMC Bioinf., 2007, 8, (Suppl 3), p. S2.
    31. 31)
      • 22. Mina, E., Thompson, M., Kaliyaperumal, R., et al: ‘Nanopublications for exposing experimental data in the life-sciences: a Huntington's disease case study’, J. Biomed. Semantics, 2015, 6, (1), p. 5.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address