Empirical investigation of the challenges of the existing tools used in global software development projects

Empirical investigation of the challenges of the existing tools used in global software development projects

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for $120.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Software — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Global software development (GSD) is continuously increasing because of many factors such as high quality software production in offshore destinations with significant cost-savings. Objective – The objective of this study is to identify the challenges of the existing tools used in GSD projects. Method – The authors applied the systematic literature review (SLR) approach and a survey-based empirical study approach to address the research objective. Results – From both data sets, the authors identified eight challenges of the existing tools used in GSD projects. The top-ranked challenges in the SLR are the ‘inappropriate use of synchronous and asynchronous communication tools’ and ‘difficulties in adopting and learning to use the existing tools’. The top-ranked challenges in the questionnaire-based empirical study are the ‘lack of awareness of existing tools used in GSD projects’ and the ‘lack of support for collaboration and group decision making'. The results show a weak negative correlation between the ranks obtained from the SLR and the questionnaire-based empirical study ((rs(8) = −0.313), p = 0.450) Conclusion: GSD organisations should address the challenges of the existing tools used in GSD projects, especially the most common ones.


    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
      • 7. Niazi, M.: ‘An instrument for measuring the maturity of requirements engineering process’. The Sixth Int. Conf. on Product Focused Software Process Improvement, LNCS, Oulu, Finland, June 13–16. 2005.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Mishra, D., Mishra, A.: ‘A global software inspection process for distributed software developmen’, J. Univ. Comput. Sci., 2012, 18, (19), pp. 27312746.
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
      • 10. Storey, M.A., Treude, C., Van Deursen, A., Cheng, L.T.: ‘The impact of social media on software engineering practices and tools’. Proc. of the FSE/SDP Workshop on Future of Software Engineering Research, 2010.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Niazi, M., Mahmood, S., Alshayeb, M., Baqais, A., Gill, A.Q.: ‘Motivators of adopting social computing in global software development: initial results’. World Congress on Engineering 2013 (WCE 2013), London, July 2013, ISBN: 978-988-19251-0-7.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Khan, S.U.: ‘Software outsourcing vendors’ readiness model (SOVRM)’ (Keele University, UK, 2011).
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
      • 14. von Stetten, A., Beimborn, D., Kuznetsova, E., Moos, B.: ‘The impact of cultural differences on IT nearshoring risks from a German perspective’. Proc. of the 43rd IEEE Hawaii Int. Conf. on System Sciences, 2010.
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
      • 16. Oza, N.V.: ‘An empirical evaluation of client - vendor relationships in Indian software outsourcing companies, in School of Computer Science’ (University of Hertfordshire, UK, 2006).
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
      • 20. Holmstrom, H., Conchuir, E.O., Agerfalk, P.J., Fitzgerald, B.: ‘Global software development challenges: a case study on temporal, geographical and socio-cultural distance’. Int. Conf. on Global Software Engineering, ICGSE, 2006.
    21. 21)
      • 21. Damian, D., Izquierdo, L., Singer, J., Kwan, I.: ‘Awareness in the wild: why communication breakdowns occur’. Second IEEE Int. Conf. Global Software Engineering, ICGSE 2007., 2007.
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
      • 23. Kitchenham, B., Charters, C.: ‘Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering’. Joint Report, EBSE 2007-001, Keele University and Durham University, 2007.
    24. 24)
      • 24. Verner, J., Brereton, O.P., Kitchenham, B., Turner, M., Niazi, M.: ‘Systematic literature reviews in global software development: a tertiary study’. Int. Conf. on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE 2012), 2012.
    25. 25)
      • 25. von Eye, A., Mun, E.Y.: ‘Analyzing rater agreement manifest variable methods’ (Psychology Press, 2006, Pap/Cdr edn.).
    26. 26)
      • 26. Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: ‘Basics of grounded theory methods’ (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, 1990).
    27. 27)
      • 27. Kitchenham, B., Pfleeger, S.L.: Principles of Survey Research, Parts 1 to 6, Software Engineering Notes, (Nov 2001- March 2003), 2002..
    28. 28)
    29. 29)
    30. 30)
      • 30. Niazi, M., Cox, K., Verner, J.: ‘An empirical study identifying high perceived value requirements engineering practices’. Advances in Information Systems Development, 14th Int. Conf. on Information Systems Development (ISD́2005) Karlstad University, Sweden, August 15–17 2006.
    31. 31)
    32. 32)
      • 32. Khan, S.U., Niazi, M., Rashid, A.: ‘Critical barriers for offshore software development outsourcing vendors: a systematic literature review’. 16th IEEE Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conf., APSEC09, Penang, Malaysia, 2009.
    33. 33)
    34. 34)
    35. 35)
    36. 36)
      • 36. PMI: ‘project management book of knowledge - PMBOK® guide and standards’ (Project Management Institute, 2014).

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address