References

• 1. 1)
     • 14. Gactoa, M.J., Alcalá, R., Herrera, F.: ‘Interpretability of linguistic fuzzy rule-based systems: an overview of interpretability measures’, Inf. Sci., 2011, 181, (20), pp. 4340–4360 (doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2011.02.021).
  2. 2)
     • 30. Li-jin, W., Xin-xin, H., Zheng-yuan, N., Wen-hua, K.: ‘Predicting object-oriented software maintainability using projection pursuit regression’. Proc. First Int. Conf. on Information Science and Engineering (ICISE2009), 2009, pp. 3827–3830.
  3. 3)
     • 1. Gillies, C.A.: ‘Software quality: theory and management’ (Lexington, Ky., 2011, 3rd edn.).
  4. 4)
     • 6. Dromey, R.G.: ‘A model for software product quality’, IEEE Trans.Softw. Eng., 1995, 21, (2), pp. 146–162 (doi: 10.1109/32.345830).
  5. 5)
     • 26. Malhotra, R., Kaur, A., Singh, Y.: ‘Empirical validation of object-oriented metrics for predicting fault proneness at different severity levels using support vector machines’, Int. J. Syst. Assurance Eng. Manage., 2010, 1, (3), pp. 269–281 (doi: 10.1007/s13198-011-0048-7).
  6. 6)
     • 21. Specht, D.F.: ‘Probabilistic neural networks’, Neural Netw., 1990, 3, (1), pp. 109–118 (doi: 10.1016/0893-6080(90)90049-Q).
  7. 7)
     • 23. van-Koten, C., Gray, A.R.: ‘An application of Bayesian network for predicting object-oriented software maintainability’, Inf. Softw. Technol., 2006, 48, (1), pp. 59–67 (doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2005.03.002).
  8. 8)
     • 12. Guillaume, S.: ‘Designing fuzzy inference systems from data: an interpretability– oriented review’, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 2001, 9, (3), pp. 426–43 (doi: 10.1109/91.928739).
  9. 9)
     • 36. Mandel Software: http://www.sipi.usc.edu/~mendel/software/.
  10. 10)
      • 15. Zadeh, L.A.: ‘From computing with numbers to computing with words– from manipulation of measurements to manipulation of perceptions’, Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci., 2002, 12, (3), pp. 307–324.
  11. 11)
      • 22. Zhang, D., Tsai, J.J.P.: ‘Machine learning applications in software engineering’ (World Scientific Inc., 2005).
  12. 12)
      • 37. Jang, R.J.S.: ‘ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system’, IEEE Trans. Syst. ManCybern., 1993, 23, (3), pp. 665–85 (doi: 10.1109/21.256541).
  13. 13)
      • 4. Boehm, B.W., Brown, J.R., Kaspar, H., Lipow, M., MacLeod, G.J., Merritt, M.J.: ‘Characteristics of software quality’ (North Holland Publishing Company, 1978).
  14. 14)
      • 5. McCall, J.A., Richards, P.K., Walters, G.F.: ‘Factors in Software Quality’. Technical Report Volume I, NTIS, NTIS Springfield, VA, NTIS AD/A-049 014, 1977.
  15. 15)
      • 35. Mohantya, R., Ravib, V., Patrac, M.R.: ‘Hybrid intelligent systems for predicting software reliability’, Appl. Soft Comput., 2013, 13, (1), pp. 189–200 (doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2012.08.015).
  16. 16)
      • 19. Koski, T., Noble, J.M.: ‘Bayesian networks. An introduction’ (John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., 2009).
  17. 17)
      • 10. Srivastava, P.R., Kumar, K.: ‘An approach towards software quality assessment’, Commun. Comput. Inf. Syst. Series’, 2009, 31, (6), pp. 345–346 (doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-00405-6_40).
  18. 18)
      • 33. Prabhakar, , Dutta, M.: ‘Prediction of software effort using artificial neural network and support vector machine’, Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. Softw. Eng., 2013, 3, (3), pp. 40–46.
  19. 19)
      • 34. Al-Jamimi, H.A., Ahmed, M.: ‘Prediction of software maintainability using fuzzy logic’. Proc. IEEE Third Int. Conf. on Software Engineering and Service Science (ICSESS), 2012, pp. 702–705.
  20. 20)
      • 18. Hamel, L.H.: ‘Knowledge discovery with support vector machines’ (Wiley, 2009).
  21. 21)
      • 25. Jeet, K., Dhir, R.: ‘Bayesian and fuzzy approach to assess and predict the maintainability of software: acomparative study’ (International Scholarly Research Network ISRN Software Engineering, 2012).
  22. 22)
      • 8. Sharma, A., Kumar, R., Grover, P.S.: ‘Estimation of quality for software components –an empirical approach’. Proc. SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 2008, pp. 1–10.
  23. 23)
      • 20. Buhmann, M.D.: ‘Radial basis functions: theory and implementations’ (Cambridge University Press, 2003).
  24. 24)
      • 16. Mamdani, E.H., Assilian, S.: ‘An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller’, Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud., 1975, 7, (1), pp. 1–13 (doi: 10.1016/S0020-7373(75)80002-2).
  25. 25)
      • 40. Ahmed, M., Muzaffar, Z.: ‘Handling imprecision and uncertainty in software development effort prediction: a type-2 fuzzy logic based framework’, J. Inf. Softw. Technol., 2009, 51, (3), pp. 640–654 (doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.004).
  26. 26)
      • 2. Standard II: ISO-9126 Software Product Evaluation –Quality Characteristics and Guidelines for Their Use, 1991.
  27. 27)
      • 17. Takagi, T., Sugeno, M.: ‘Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modelling and control’, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 1985, 15, (1), pp. 116–131 (doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1985.6313399).
  28. 28)
      • 27. Thwin, M.M.T., Quah, T.-S.: ‘Application of neural networks for software quality prediction using object-oriented metrics’, J. Syst. Softw., 2005, 76, (2), pp. 147–56 (doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2004.05.001).
  29. 29)
      • 28. Zhou, Y., Leung, H.: ‘Predicting object-oriented software maintainability using multivariate adaptive regression splines’, J. Syst. Softw., 2007, 80, (8), pp. 1349–1361 (doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2006.10.049).
  30. 30)
      • 13. Paiva, R.P., Dourado, A.: ‘Interpretability and learning in neuro-fuzzy systems’, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 2004, 147, (1), pp. 17–38 (doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2003.11.012).
  31. 31)
      • 11. Al-Jamimi, H.A., Ahmed, M.: ‘Machine learning-based software quality prediction models: state of the art’. Proc. Fourth Int. Conf. on Information Science and Applications, Pattaya, Thailand, 2013.
  32. 32)
      • 29. Dash, Y., Dubey, S.K., Rana, A.: ‘Maintainability prediction of object oriented software system by using artificial neural network approach’, Int. J. Soft Comput. Eng., 2012, 2, (2), pp. 420–423.
  33. 33)
      • 7. Challa, J.S., Paul, A., Dada, Y., Nerella, V., Srivastava, P.R., Singh, A.P.: ‘Integrated software quality evaluation: afuzzy multi-criteria approach’, J. Inf. Process. Syst., 2011, 7, (3), pp. 473–518.
  34. 34)
      • 3. Fenton, N.E., Pfleeger, S.L.: ‘Software metrics: arigorous and practical approach’ (USA PWS Publishing Co., Boston, MA, 1998).
  35. 35)
      • 39. Shepperd, M., MacDonell, S.: ‘Evaluating prediction systems in software project estimation’, Inf. Softw. Technol., 2012, 54, (8), pp. 820–827 (doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2011.12.008).
  36. 36)
      • 24. Li, W., Henry, S.: ‘Object oriented metrics that predict maintainability’, J. Syst. Softw., 1993, 23, (2), pp. 111–122 (doi: 10.1016/0164-1212(93)90077-B).
  37. 37)
      • 31. Haiquan, Y., Gaoliang, P., Wenjian, L.: ‘An application of case based reasoning to predict structure maintainability’. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering, 2009, pp. 1–5.
  38. 38)
      • 38. DeLucia, A., Pompella, E., Stefanucci, S.: ‘Assessing effort estimation models for corrective maintenance through empirical studies’, Inf. Softw. Technol., 2005, 47, (1), pp. 3–15 (doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2004.05.002).
  39. 39)
      • 9. Lamouchi, O., Cherif, A.R., Lévy, N.: ‘A framework based measurements for evaluating an IS quality’. Proc. Fifth on Asia-Pacific Conf. on Conceptual Modelling, Wollongong, NSW, Australia, 2008.
  40. 40)
      • 32. Nguyen, V., Boehm, B., Danphitsanuphan, P.: ‘A controlled experiment in assessing and estimating software maintenance tasks’, Inf. Softw. Technol., 2011, 53, (6), pp. 682–691 (doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2010.11.003).