From requirements to implementation of ad-hoc social Web applications: an empirical pattern-based approach

From requirements to implementation of ad-hoc social Web applications: an empirical pattern-based approach

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Software — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Social technologies are transforming the Web to a place where users actively contribute to content production and opinion making. At B2E level, enterprises look at social networking tools as possible means for improving their operations thanks to the unstructured interaction they foster among employees. This paper tackles the problem of defining a quick and pragmatic approach for specifying the requirements of ad-hoc social web applications and for going down to their implementation. The approach is motivated by the fact that in most cases the ad-hoc needs that the company foresees are just a peculiar subset of the large set of requirements that are addressed by current social platforms. The main contributions of this work include: the classification of the social interactions that can be observed in virtual communities in a comprehensive taxonomy of requirements (based on a broad analysis of the existing social networking platforms, considering both public and enterprise solutions); the definition of requirement specification as a selection process upon this taxonomy; and the mapping to design and implementation artifacts through automatic generation of design models and of running code. This is implemented through a set of pattern-based model transformations that transform the requirements (specified according to a goal-oriented methodology) to UML models and then to running Java code. A validation of the effectiveness of the approach is provided, in terms of percentage of hand-written code with respect to the parts that can be automatically obtained through the transformations.


    1. 1)
      • Olding, E., Rozwell, C., Sinur, J.: `Social BPM: design by doing', Technical report, May 2010, Gartner, Gartner research ID Number: G00200281.
    2. 2)
      • Tibco Tibbr,
    3. 3)
      • Salesforce Chatter,
    4. 4)
      • Yu, E.: `Towards modelling and reasoning support for early-phase requirements engineering', IEEE Int. Conf. on Requirements Engineering (RE 2002), 2002, p. 226–235.
    5. 5)
      • Robles, E., Garrigós, I., Grigera, J., Winckler, M.: `Capture and evolution of web requirements using Webspec.', Int. Conf. on Web Engineering (ICWE), 2010, p. 173–188.
    6. 6)
      • de Paula, M.G., da Silva, B.S., Barbosa, S.D.: `Using an interaction model as a resource for communication in design', CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2005, Portland, p. 1713–1716.
    7. 7)
      • M.J. Escalona , N. Koch . Requirements engineering for web applications – a comparative study. J. Web Eng. , 2 , 193 - 212
    8. 8)
      • B. Kitchenham . Procedures for performing systematic reviews.
    9. 9)
      • GR-Tool, goal-reasoning tool,
    10. 10)
      • OpenOME, an open-source requirements engineering tool,
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
      • Martínez, A., Pastor, O., Mylopoulos, J., Estrada, H.: `From organizational models to software requirements', Int. Conf. on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE), 2009, p. 61–66.
    13. 13)
      • Gárrigos, I., Mazón, J.-N., Trujillo, J.: `A requirement analysis approach for using ', ICWE'09: Int. Conf. Web Engineering, Springer LNCS, 2009, San Sebastián, Spain, p. 151–165.
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
      • F. Valverde , I. Panach , N. Aquino , O. Pastor , J.A. Macías , T. Granollers , P. Latorre . (2009) Dealing with abstract interaction modelling in an MDE development process: a pattern-based approach, ‘New trends on human-computer interaction‘.
    16. 16)
      • F. Valverde , O. Pastor , P. Valderas , V. Pelechano , S. Murugesan . (2010) A model-driven engineering approach for defining rich internet applications: a Web 2.0 case study, ‘Handbook of research on web 2.0, 3.0, and X.0: technologies, business, and social applications’.
    17. 17)
      • T.A. Yang , D.J. Kim , S. Murugesan . A comparative analysis of online social networking sites and their business models, Handbook of research on Web 2.0, 3.0, and X.0: technologies, business, and social applications’ (2010).
    18. 18)
      • C. Fuchs , S. Murugesan . (2010) Social Software and Web 2.0: their sociological foundations and implications, Handbook of research on Web 2.0, 3.0, and X.0: technologies, business, and social applications.
    19. 19)
      • Mao, Y., Vassileva, J., Grassmann, W.: `A system dynamics approach to study virtual communities', Proc. 40th Annual Hawaii Int. Conf. on System Sciences (HICSS'07), Big Island, Hawaii, p. 178–187.
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
      • P. Fraternali , M. Tisi , M. Silva , L. Frattini , S. Murugesan . (2010) Building community-based web applications with a model-driven approach and design pattern, Handbook of research on Web 2.0, 3.0, and X.0: technologies, business, and social applications.
    24. 24)
      • Koch, N., Rossi, G.: `Patterns for adaptive web applications', Proc. Seventh European Conf. on Pattern Languages of Programs, Irsee, Germany, 3–7 July 2002, p. 179–194.
    25. 25)
      • Rossi, G., Schwabe, D., Danculovic, J., Miaton, L.: `Patterns for personalized web applications', Proc. EuroPlop, 2001, p. 423–436.
    26. 26)
      • Brambilla, M., Fraternali, P., Vaca, C.: `BPMN and design patterns for engineering social BPM solutions', Int. Workshop on Business Process Management and Social Software (BPMS2), 2011, Co-Located with BPM 2011, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
    27. 27)
      • Brambilla, M., Butti, S., Fraternali, P.: `Business process modeling and quick prototyping with WebRatio BPM', Proc. BPM Demonstration Track 2010, 14–16 September 2010, Hoboken, USA, 615, online:
    28. 28)
      • Brambilla, M., Fraternali, P., Vaca, C.: `A notation for supporting social business process modeling', Third Int. Workshop on Business Process Model and Notation, BPMN 2011, 21–22 November 2011, Lucerne, Switzerland, p. 88–102.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address