Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Implementation of IoT analytics ionospheric forecasting system based on machine learning and ThingSpeak

Nowadays, using the Internet of Things (IoT), several real-time forecasting systems have been developed. The primary challenge of this system is to utilise an appropriate prediction model that can predict various space weather parameters as accurately as possible. In this study, an ionospheric IoT analytical system with variational mode decomposition (VMD) based on kernel extreme learning machine (KELM) is proposed. The ionospheric signal delay/total electron content (TEC) data from Continuous Reference Stations (CORS) Port Blair (2.03°N, 165.25°E, geomagnetic), Bengaluru (4.40°N, 150.77°E, geomagnetic), Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation (KLEF) – Guntur (7.50°N, 153.76°E; geomagnetic) and Lucknow (17.98°N, 155.22°E; geomagnetic) are used for the analysis during the period of 2015. The ionospheric signal delays of four CORS are computed from ThingSpeak (IoT) with the channel ID and the Application Programming Interface key. ThingSpeak data is given to the ionospheric forecasting model (VMD-KELM). The results predicted from the proposed model are able to achieve the faster training process and obtain a similar accuracy to that of the VMD-artificial neural network. The proposed VMD-KELM application is adopted when a cloud-based forecasting system requires fast learning speed and good accuracy. As a result, the cloud paradigm offers the possibility without web development skills or highly specific statistics.

References

    1. 1)
      • 8. Elmunim, N., Abdullah, M., Hasbi, A.M., et al: ‘Comparison of Gps Tec variations with holt-winter method and Iri-2012 over Langkawi, Malaysia’, Adv. Space Res., 2017, 60, (2), pp. 276285.
    2. 2)
      • 5. Fang, L., Cheng, X., Wang, H., et al: ‘Mobile demand forecasting via deep graph-sequence spatiotemporal modeling in cellular networks’, IEEE Internet Things J., 2018, 5, (4), pp. 30913101.
    3. 3)
      • 10. Zhang, G.P.: ‘Time series forecasting using a hybrid arima and neural network model’, Neurocomputing, 2003, 50, pp. 159175.
    4. 4)
      • 7. Krankowski, A., Kosek, W., Baran, L., et al: ‘Wavelet analysis and forecasting of Vtec obtained with Gps observations over European latitudes’, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 2005, 67, (12), pp. 11471156.
    5. 5)
      • 16. Gopi, S.: ‘Rinex Gps-Tec program, version 1.45’ (Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA, 2010).
    6. 6)
      • 4. Li, L., Ota, K., Dong, M.: ‘When weather matters: IoT-based electrical load forecasting for smart grid’, IEEE Commun. Mag., 2017, 55, (10), pp. 4651.
    7. 7)
      • 18. Wei, Y., Sun, S., Ma, J., et al: ‘A decomposition clustering ensemble learning approach for forecasting foreign exchange rates’, J. Manag. Sci. Eng., 2019, 4, (1), pp. 4554.
    8. 8)
      • 2. Xiaojun, C., Xianpeng, L., Peng, X.: ‘IoT-based air pollution monitoring and forecasting system’. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computer and Computational Sciences (ICCCS), Noida, India, January 2015, pp. 257260.
    9. 9)
      • 13. Bai, H., Fu, H., Wang, J., et al: ‘A prediction model of ionospheric Fof2 based on extreme learning machine’, Radio Sci., 2018, 53, (10), pp. 12921301.
    10. 10)
      • 9. Sivavaraprasad, G., Ratnam, D.V.: ‘Performance evaluation of ionospheric time delay forecasting models using Gps observations at a low-latitude station’, Adv. Space Res., 2017, 60, (2), pp. 475490.
    11. 11)
      • 1. Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., et al: ‘Internet of things (IoT): a vision, architectural elements, and future directions’, Future Gener. Comput. Syst., 2013, 29, (7), pp. 16451660.
    12. 12)
      • 14. Bouya, Z., Terkildsen, M., Francis, M.: ‘Total electron content forecast model over Australia’. 40th COSPAR Sci. Assem., Moscow, Russia, August 2014, pp. 210.
    13. 13)
      • 17. Dragomiretskiy, K., Zosso, D.: ‘Variational mode decomposition’, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 2014, 62, (3), pp. 531544.
    14. 14)
      • 12. Maruyama, T.: ‘Regional reference total electron content model over Japan based on neural network mapping techniques’, Ann. Geophys., 2008, 25, (12), pp. 26092614.
    15. 15)
      • 11. McKinnell, L.A., Poole, A.W.: ‘Predicting the ionospheric F layer using neural networks’, J. Geophys. Res., Space Phys., 2004, 109, (A8), pp. 111.
    16. 16)
      • 15. Dabbakuti, J.K., Ch, B.: ‘Ionospheric monitoring system based on the internet of things with thingspeak’, Astrophys. Space Sci., 2019, 364, (8), p. 137.
    17. 17)
      • 6. Fowdur, T., Beeharry, Y., Hurbungs, V., et al: ‘Performance analysis and implementation of an adaptive real-time weather forecasting system’, Internet of Things, 2018, 3, pp. 1233.
    18. 18)
      • 19. Huang, G.-B., Chen, L., Siew, C.K.: ‘Universal approximation using incremental constructive feedforward networks with random hidden nodes’, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., 2006, 17, (4), pp. 879892.
    19. 19)
      • 3. Patil, S.R.: ‘Smart environmental monitoring through internet of things (Iot) using Raspberrypi 3’. Proc. Int. Conf. on Current Trends in Computer, Electrical, Electronics and Communication (CTCEEC), Mysore, India, September 2017, pp. 595600.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-rsn.2019.0394
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-rsn.2019.0394
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address